The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Visual Methodologies in Qualitative Research: Autophotography and Photo Elicitation Applied to Mental Health Research
Open accessAbstract
Introduction: Visual methodologies are a collection of methods used to understand and interpret images. These methods have been used for a long time in anthropology and sociology; however, they are a relatively new way to research for the majority of disciplines, especially health research. Two effective visual methodologies that could be used in health research are autophotography and photo elicitation. Autophotography: Autophotography is asking participants to take photographs of their environment and then using the photographs as actual data. Autophotography captures the world through the participant’s eyes with subsequent knowledge production. Photo Elicitation: Photo elicitation is using photographs or other visual mediums in an interview to generate verbal discussion to create data and knowledge. Different layers of meaning can be discovered as this method evokes deep emotions, memories, and ideas. Photo elicitation interviews contribute to trustworthiness and rigor of the findings through member checking. Mental Health Research: This article aims to describe the use of autophotography and photo elicitation to compare people with clinically diagnosed depression and people without depression and their ideas about sources of meaning in life and beliefs about the meaning of life. The analytical approach incorporates eight steps. Firstly, data analysis began during the interviews, then came organizing the data, coding the data, structured analysis, detailed analysis, interpretative analysis, creating themes, and the write-up. The steps taken to ensure trustworthiness were Shenton’s credibility, transferability, confirmability, and dependability. This method is a new, innovative, and viable method for mental health researchers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414
Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects
Shenton, A. K. (2004) · Education for Information · doi:10.3233/efi-2004-22201 · Cited by 9,748
Photovoice: Concept, Methodology, and Use for Participatory Needs Assessment
Wang, C., & Burris, M. A. (1997) · Health Education & Behavior · doi:10.1177/109019819702400309 · Cited by 5,551
Talking about pictures: A case for photo elicitation
Harper, D. (2002) · Visual Studies · doi:10.1080/14725860220137345 · Cited by 3,966
Visual Anthropology: Photography as a Research Method
Evans-Pritchard, D., Collier, J., & Collier, M. (1987) · Western Folklore · doi:10.2307/1499536 · Cited by 1,277
Collecting Qualitative Data: A Field Manual for Applied Research
Guest, G., Namey, E. E., & Mitchell, M. L. (2013) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781506374680 · Cited by 1,230
Blaxter, L., Hughes, C., & Tight, M. (2010) · doi:10.82444/warw.33661024 · Cited by 933
Photo Elicitation Interview (PEI): Using Photos to Elicit Children's Perspectives
Epstein, I., Stevens, B., McKeever, P., & Baruchel, S. (2006) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/160940690600500301 · Cited by 559
Qualitative Social Research: Critical Methods for Social Change
Dunk-West, P., & Saxton, K. (2024) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003316732 · Cited by 441
Qualitative Data Analysis: From Start to Finish
Harding, J. (2018) · Cited by 416
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Jenkings K. N., 2008, Qualitative Social Research, 9, 95
- Noland C. M., 2006, Journal of Research Practice, 2, 1
Cited by
Robot companion cats for people at home with dementia: A qualitative case study on companotics
Pike, J., Picking, R., & Cunningham, S. (2021) · Dementia · doi:10.1177/1471301220932780 · Cited by 30
Reis, N. A., Kowalski, K. C., Mosewich, A. D., & Ferguson, L. J. (2022) · Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health · doi:10.1080/2159676x.2021.1920455 · Cited by 24
Salazar, S. M. D. C., Dino, M. J. S., & Macindo, J. R. B. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Nursing · doi:10.1111/jocn.16675 · Cited by 11
Vainikka, E., Soronen, A., & Kallio, S.-M. (2025) · Critical Studies in Television: The International Journal of Television Studies · doi:10.1177/17496020241269277 · Cited by 9
“1 In most of the interviews, we used a visual elicitation method (Glaw et al., 2017; Harper, 2002), where the informants were shown visualizations of scenarios depicting how data and AI might be used in television and fi lm productions.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Glaw, X., Inder, K., Kable, A., & Hazelton, M.
- Venue
- International Journal of Qualitative Methods
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2017-12-01
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1609-4069 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2777029405
- Cited by
- 521
- References
- 23
- FWCI
- 39.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- Licence
- journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
- Funders
- The University of Newcastle (Australian Postgraduate Award and Research Trainin)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Visual Methodologies in Qualitative Research: Autophotography and Photo Elicitation Applied to Mental Health Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1609406917748215
- The paper
- Glaw, X., Inder, K., Kable, A., & Hazelton, M. (2017). Visual Methodologies in Qualitative Research: Autophotography and Photo Elicitation Applied to Mental Health Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917748215
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.