Cited by 12Indigenous Health, Education, and RightsQualitative Research Methods and EthicsParticipatory Visual Research Methods

An Application of Two-Eyed Seeing to Community-Engaged Research With Indigenous Mothers

Open access
Wright, A. L., Gabel, C., Bomberry, R., Wahoush, O.·2019·International Journal of Qualitative Methods

Abstract

The Two-Eyed Seeing framework advocates viewing the world with one eye grounded in Indigenous knowledges while the other eye is grounded in Westernized knowledges. Research funding bodies have recently advocated for its use in research with Indigenous peoples, yet its interpretation and application in the literature has been inconsistent. To contribute to its maturation as a framework, this article describes the application of Two-Eyed Seeing to a community-engaged study aimed at understanding how Indigenous mothers experience using health care to meet the health needs of their infants in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. Two-Eyed Seeing was applied to the research while applying the four R’s as suggested by Kirkness and Barnhardt’s: relevance, respect, responsibility, and reciprocity. While providing practical applications of this framework to research with Indigenous mothers and infants in an urban off-reserve setting, this article also contributes an approach to data analysis that incorporates Indigenous and Western knowledges within interpretive description methodology.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1609406919866565

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wright, A. L., Gabel, C., Bomberry, R., & Wahoush, O.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • McMaster University (CA)
Corresponding author
Wright, A. L.
Venue
International Journal of Qualitative Methods
Published
2019-01-01
Volume
18
ISSN
1609-4069 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2965724200
Cited by
12
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2
FWCI
1.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Qualitative Methods (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Institute of Aboriginal Peoples Health (FN146613)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Participatory Visual Research Methods
Keywords
Two-Eyed Seeing, indigenous knowledge, community-engaged research, Indigenous mothers, infant health care, maternal health, urban Indigenous peoples, interpretive description

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review