The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Customization design method for complex product systems based on a meta-model
Open accessAbstract
In order to effectively reuse the design knowledge of product family life cycle development and support holistic and rapid individual product design, this article presents a new meta-model-based systemic customization design method for complex product systems within a product-pedigree. The proposed method aims to synthetically analyze the common and adaptive customer demands and product features of a product-pedigree of complex product systems and to quickly respond to the changing demands based on knowledge accumulation in the field of customization design. The key to implement such a method is (1) to construct a product-pedigree-oriented product meta-model with a four-layered architecture where it is possible to achieve a high degree of abstraction of product and (2) to develop a special technique for configuring the meta-model of the complex product systems. We have tested the proposed method with the rapid design of product-pedigree of a high-speed train’s bogies as an illustrative example. In this work, a rapid customization design prototype system has been developed and applied to the design of a high-speed train’s bogie to illustrate how to construct a product meta-model and how to conduct configuration design on different layers and variant design for generating new products.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Engineering design — A systematic approach
Edwards, K. L. (1995) · Materials & Design · doi:10.1016/0261-3069(96)84970-3 · Cited by 2,130
Creative Cognition: Theory, Research, and Applications
Finke, R. A., Ward, T. B., & Smith, S. M. (1992) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/7722.001.0001 · Cited by 1,433
The evolution, challenges, and future of knowledge representation in product design systems
Chandrasegaran, S. K., Ramani, K., Sriram, R. D., Horváth, I., Bernard, A., Harik, R. F., & Gao, W. (2013) · Computer-Aided Design · doi:10.1016/j.cad.2012.08.006 · Cited by 667
ElMaraghy, H., Schuh, G., ElMaraghy, W., Piller, F., Schönsleben, P., Tseng, M., & Bernard, A. (2013) · CIRP Annals · doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2013.05.007 · Cited by 587
IJCAI'05 Proceedings of the 19th international joint conference on Artificial intelligence
Lapata, M., & Barzilay, R. (2005) · Cited by 337
Proceedings of 1993 15th International Conference on Software Engineering
(1993) · doi:10.1109/icse.1993 · Cited by 234
CPM2: A Core Model for Product Data
Fenves, S. J., Foufou, S., Bock, C. E., & Sriram, R. D. (2008) · Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering · doi:10.1115/1.2830842 · Cited by 156
Lyu, G., Chu, X., & Xue, D. (2016) · Computers in Industry · doi:10.1016/j.compind.2016.11.001 · Cited by 60
A knowledge-based system for numerical design of experiments processes in mechanical engineering
Blondet, G., Duigou, J. L., & Boudaoud, N. (2019) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2019.01.013 · Cited by 28
Cited by
Tarcan, R., Todor-Boer, O., Petrovai, I., Leordean, C., Astilean, S., & Botiz, I. (2020) · Journal of Materials Chemistry C · doi:10.1039/c9tc04916a · Cited by 723
Fog computing: a taxonomy, systematic review, current trends and research challenges
Singh, J., Singh, P., & Gill, S. S. (2021) · Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing · doi:10.1016/j.jpdc.2021.06.005 · Cited by 154
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, R., Zhang, H., Qin, S., Ding, G., & Han, X.
- Venue
- Advances in Mechanical Engineering
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2019-10
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 10
- ISSN
- 1687-8132 (ISSN-L)
- 1687-8140
- OpenAlex
- W2981046656
- Cited by
- 435
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 178.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Customization design method for complex product systems based on a meta-model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1687814019882207
- The paper
- Li, R., Zhang, H., Qin, S., Ding, G., & Han, X. (2019). Customization design method for complex product systems based on a meta-model. Advances in Mechanical Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814019882207
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
