The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Development of the Stanford Expectations of Treatment Scale (SETS): A tool for measuring patient outcome expectancy in clinical trials
Abstract
Background: A patient’s response to treatment may be influenced by the expectations that the patient has before initiating treatment. In the context of clinical trials, the influence of participant expectancy may blur the distinction between real and sham treatments, reducing statistical power to detect specific treatment effects. There is therefore a need for a tool that prospectively predicts expectancy effects on treatment outcomes across a wide range of treatment modalities. Purpose: To help assess expectancy effects, we created the Stanford Expectations of Treatment Scale (SETS): an instrument for measuring positive and negative treatment expectancies. Internal reliability of the instrument was tested in Study 1. Criterion validity of the instrument (convergent, discriminant, and predictive) was assessed in Studies 2 and 3. Methods: The instrument was developed using 200 participants in Study 1. Reliability and validity assessments were made with an additional 423 participants in Studies 2 and 3. Results: The final six-item SETS contains two subscales: positive expectancy (α = 0.81–0.88) and negative expectancy (α = 0.81–0.86). The subscales predict a significant amount of outcome variance (between 12% and 18%) in patients receiving surgical and pain interventions. The SETS is simple to administer, score, and interpret. Conclusion: The SETS may be used in clinical trials to improve statistical sensitivity for detecting treatment differences or in clinical settings to identify patients with poor treatment expectancies.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Participants’ expectancy will be assessed with the Stanford Expectations of Treatment Scale (SETS; [114]) at baseline”
In the citing paper
“Secondary outcomes showed promising signs, although the openlabel design and small sample size means that the results must be interpreted in the context of treatment expectancy at baseline, in which positive effects were higher than average and negative effects were lower than average [41].”
From Psilocybin‐assisted psychotherapy for methamphetamine use disorder: A pilot open‐label safety and feasibility study. (2025) · cites this paper as [41]
In the citing paper
“Valid measures of response expectancies include the Stanford Expectations of Treatment Scale (SETS), 87 and the credibility/expectancy questionnaire (CEQ). 88”
From Best Practice Recommendations for Conducting and Reporting Controlled Trials in Clinical Hypnosis Research (2024) · cites this paper as [87]
Citations
Cites
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
Zigmond, A. S., & Snaith, R. P. (1983) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x · Cited by 47,139
Research in Organizational Behavior.
Grimes, A. J., Cummings, L. L., & Staw, B. M. (1986) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392975 · Cited by 11,303
(1976) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 8,899
Scheier, M. F., Carver, C. S., & Bridges, M. W. (1994) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.67.6.1063 · Cited by 7,456
Farrar, J. T., Young, J. P., LaMoreaux, L., Werth, J. L., & Poole, M. R. (2001) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(01)00349-9 · Cited by 5,808
Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations
Dworkin, R. H., Turk, D. C., Farrar, J. T., Haythornthwaite, J. A., Jensen, M. P., Katz, N. P., Kerns, R. D., Stucki, G., Allen, R. R., Bellamy, N., et al. (2005) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2004.09.012 · Cited by 3,732
Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations
Turk, D. C., Dworkin, R. H., Allen, R. R., Bellamy, N., Brandenburg, N., Carr, D. B., Cleeland, C., Dionne, R., Farrar, J. T., Galer, B. S., et al. (2003) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2003.08.001 · Cited by 3,510
Psychometric properties of the credibility/expectancy questionnaire
Devilly, G. J., & Borkovec, T. D. (2000) · Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0005-7916(00)00012-4 · Cited by 2,295 · cited 1×
“While the instrument has shown success in predicting some outcome variables [33], it is not clear that the instrument (particularly the credibility subscale) is a useful tool for predicting treatment response [34].”
MethodECDEU Assessment Manual: (591322011-001)
Guy, W. (1976) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e591322011-001 · Cited by 1,896
Credibility of analogue therapy rationales
Borkovec, T. D., & Nau, S. D. (1972) · Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/0005-7916(72)90045-6 · Cited by 1,553 · cited 1×
“An exception is the Credibility and Expectancy Scale, which was developed in 1972 by Borkovec and Nau [32].”
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Manchikanti L, 2011, Pain Physician, 14, E157
- Pogge RC, 1963, Med Times, 91, 773
- Mao J, 2010, Altern Ther Health Med, 16, 22
- 10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1024 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.1063 · DOI · Paper page
- Iverson S, 2008, J Am Osteopath Assoc, 108, 699
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 212
MDMA-assisted brief cognitive behavioral conjoint therapy for PTSD: Study protocol for a pilot study
Morland, L. A., Perivoliotis, D., Wachsman, T. R., Alam, M. A., Knopp, K. C., Khalifian, C. E., Ramanathan, D., Chargin, B. E., Bismark, A. W., Glynn, S. M., et al. (2024) · Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications · doi:10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101314 · Cited by 6
Huang, Z., Liang, X., Luo, Y., Fang, Z., Xu, M., Xu, Y., Cheng, S., & Li, L. (2025) · Journal of Pain Research · doi:10.2147/jpr.s492541 · Cited by 6
Expanding Targets for Intervention in Later Life Pain
Reid, M. C. (2016) · Clinics in Geriatric Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.cger.2016.06.009 · Cited by 7
Rychtarik, R. G., McGillicuddy, N. B., Papandonatos, G. D., Whitney, R. B., & Connors, G. J. (2017) · Psychology of Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1037/adb0000253 · Cited by 6
Ziadni, M. S., Chen, A. L., Winslow, T., Mackey, S., & Darnall, B. D. (2020) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-020-04415-x · Cited by 6
“Younger J, Gandhi V, Hubbard E, Mackey S. Development of the Stanford Expectations of Treatment Scale (SETS): a tool for measuring patient outcome expectancy in clinical trials.”
MethodSelf-citationBukovsky, D., Amaev, A., Song, J., Kyte, S., Carmona-Torres, E., Ueno, F., Luca, V. D., Strafella, A. P., Husain, M. I., Graff‐Guerrero, A., et al. (2025) · Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2025.111541 · Cited by 9
Wessels, J., Klinger, R., Benson, S., Brenner, T., Elsenbruch, S., & Aulenkamp, J. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1396562 · Cited by 6
van der Arend, B. W. H., van Casteren, D. S., Verhagen, I. E., MaassenVanDenBrink, A., & Terwindt, G. M. (2024) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-024-07955-8 · Cited by 5
“To correct for the unblinded settingof the study, the Stanford Expectations of Treatment Scale will be used [29].”
MethodNavarro-Fernández, G., Bravo-Aparicio, J., Castillo, J. L. D., Beltrán-Alacreu, H., & Gil‐Martínez, A. (2024) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm13154445 · Cited by 5
“It has been validated in English [25] but not in Spanish, so the authors created an ad hoc version for this study.”
Psychedelics, OCD and Related Disorders: Setting methodological strategies for future studies
Leuzzi, R., Tardivo, G., Pellegrini, L., Albert, U., & Fineberg, N. A. (2025) · Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jocrd.2025.100951 · Cited by 5
“…et al. (Hovmand) even suggest serial assessment as a tool to estimate the risk of expectation bias in trial participants and propose standardized instruments such as the Credibility/Expectancy Questionnaire (Younger et al., 2012) or other alternative instruments (see Szigeti & Heifets, 2024).”
Investigation of Expectations and Satisfaction After Sinus Surgery for Chronic Rhinosinusitis
Mattos, J. L., Hopper, H. M., Soler, Z. M., Mace, J. C., Schlosser, R. J., Payne, S. C., Smith, T. L., & Mattos, M. K. (2024) · The Laryngoscope · doi:10.1002/lary.31770 · Cited by 4
Li, R., Srinakarin, K., de la Vega, R., Murray, C. B., & Palermo, T. M. (2025) · Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2025.104791 · Cited by 6
Donegan, C. J., Daldegan‐Bueno, D., Noorani, T. N., Sumner, R. L., Forsyth, A., Evans, W., Smith, T., Hoeh, N. R., Sundram, F., Menkes, D. B., et al. (2025) · Neuropharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2025.110670 · Cited by 4
Lopresti, A. L., Smith, S. J., Ding, L., Li, Y., & Zhang, P. (2025) · Frontiers in Nutrition · doi:10.3389/fnut.2025.1621516 · Cited by 4
“The CTTES, Frontiers in Nutrition 05 frontiersin.org a 6-item questionnaire, is a revision of the Stanford Expectations of Treatment Scale (38), with wording modified to reference clinical trials on memory.”
Placebo and the law of identification
Bierman, S., Weil, A., & Dahmer, S. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1474558 · Cited by 4
Lopresti, A. L., Smith, S. J., Marx, W., Díez‐Municio, M., & Morán-Valero, M. I. (2025) · Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.tjnut.2025.05.024 · Cited by 5
Hohenschurz‐Schmidt, D., Smith, S., Schmid, A. B., Bright, P., Draper‐Rodi, J., Evans, M. C., Kemp, H. I., Esteves, N. K., Pigott, E., Scott, W. A., et al. (2025) · Pain Management · doi:10.1080/17581869.2025.2515010 · Cited by 5
“…patient global impression of change [55,65], medication and intervention use, expectancy and credibility measures (assessed at baseline and prior to visit 2) [66,67], and qualitative feedback from participants and providers on perceived benefits, harms, mechanisms, and trial design suggestions.”
Ocokoljic, A., Stuhlreyer, J., Paschke-Dahl, L., Elsenbruch, S., Rolvien, T., Beil, F. T., Zöllner, C., & Klinger, R. (2025) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108899 · Cited by 4
“Surgery-related treatment expectations will be assessed using the Stanford Expectations of Treatment Scale (SETS), 41 while postoperative pain management expectations will be evaluated with the GEEE tool 42 and NRS scales to assess treatment expectations.”
Poulin, J. M., Bigford, G. E., Lanctôt, K. L., Giacobbe, P., Schaffer, A., Sinyor, M., Rabin, J. S., Masellis, M., Singnurkar, A., Pople, C. B., et al. (2024) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-024-08268-6 · Cited by 7
“Each of the six items is coded with a similar 7-point scale starting from “strongly disa-gree” to “strongly agree” [104] •”
BackgroundLee, E. K. P., Zhang, D. D., Yip, B. H. K., Cheng, J., Hui, S. S., Yu, E. Y. T., Leung, M. K. W., Chu, C. W., Mihailidou, A. S., & Wong, S. Y. S. (2021) · American Journal of Hypertension · doi:10.1093/ajh/hpab019 · Cited by 5
Effect of patients’ expectations on clinical response to fampridine treatment
Ladeira, F. F., Mendonça, M., Caetano, A., Salavisa, M., Delgado, H., Correia, A. S., & Baptista, M. V. (2018) · Neurological Sciences · doi:10.1007/s10072-018-3613-x · Cited by 4
Louie, E., Towers, E., Morse, A. R., Watt, J., Bryant, Z., Haber, P., & Morley, K. C. (2025) · International Journal of Mental Health Nursing · doi:10.1111/inm.70010 · Cited by 4
Barbier, G., Descarreaux, M., Cottin, F., & Lardon, A. (2025) · Chiropractic & Manual Therapies · doi:10.1186/s12998-025-00580-5 · Cited by 3
“…low back pain, number of therapist(s) consulted for low back pain, disability, pain intensity, pain unpleasantness, previous episode of low back pain, Start Back Screening Tools (SBST), stiffness experienced by the patient, use of medication for low back pain) and expectations about treatment [31].”
Azevedo, B. O., de Lira, M. R., Nogueira, H. C., Berg, R., Pagé, M. G., Younger, J., Silva, G. Z. M., & Chaves, T. C. (2025) · Musculoskeletal Science and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.msksp.2025.103471 · Cited by 3
Self-citationSchindler, E. A. D., Gottschalk, C. H., Pittman, B. P., & D'Souza, D. (2025) · Headache The Journal of Head and Face Pain · doi:10.1111/head.70024 · Cited by 3
“27,39 As in previously published psilocybin-headache studies, the number of participants in the present study is small, limiting the power of statistical analyses and the generalizability of the findings.”
Lopresti, A. L., & Smith, S. J. (2026) · Frontiers in Nutrition · doi:10.3389/fnut.2025.1729164 · Cited by 3
Roberts, C., Seynaeve, M., Ermakova, A. O., Dunbar, F., Wells, H., Puri, A., Bird, C., & Rucker, J. (2026) · Journal of Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1177/02698811261420087 · Cited by 6
“…psychedelic preparation visit via the SETS, a 6-item scale that measures both positive (items 1, 3 and 5) and negative (items 2, 4 and 6) treatment expectancies, with each item rated on a seven-point Likert scale (ranging from 0 = strongly disagree to 6 = strongly agree; Younger et al., 2012).”
How to set up a psychedelic study: Unique considerations for research involving human participants
Glennon, M. J., Bird, C., Yadav, P., Kleine, P., Suseelan, S., Boman-Markaki, C., Kotoula, V., Butler, M., Leech, R., Roseman, L., et al. (2026) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2026.106657 · Cited by 5
Li, Y., Maimaitiaili, R., Zhang, Y., Feng, T., Xu, Y., Yang, H., Zhang, J., Shi, J., Wang, M., Zhao, F., et al. (2022) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049162 · Cited by 3
Evaluation of the antihypertensive effect of nocturnal administration of acetylsalicylic acid
Arzalluz, M. V. R., Burgos‐Alonso, N., García-Álvarez, A., Fernandez, M. C. G., Vinyoles, E., & Gonzalo Grandes, O. (2018) · Journal of Hypertension · doi:10.1097/hjh.0000000000001887 · Cited by 3
Quantitative and Qualitative Strategies to Strengthen Internal Validity in Randomized Trials
Sidani, S., & O’Rourke, H. M. (2020) · Canadian Journal of Nursing Research · doi:10.1177/0844562120974197 · Cited by 6
“Instruments measuring perceived credibility (Younger et al., 2012) are often administered at the end of the first treatment session.”
BackgroundMücke, J., Brinks, R., Dimitriou, A., Richter, J., & Schneider, M. (2021) · Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease · doi:10.1177/1759720x211015829 · Cited by 3
Fino, E., Chessa, M. A., Starace, M. V. R., Piraccini, B. M., & Mazzetti, M. (2022) · Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology · doi:10.1111/jdv.18544 · Cited by 3
“5) 18– 71 Education Elementary 15 (15) High school 50 (50) Graduate 35 (35) Civil status Single 36 (36) Married/in relationship 44 (44) Divorced/separated 20 (20) Clinical characteristics Squamous cell carcinoma 6 (6) Melanoma in situ 2 (2) Onychomatricoma 8 (8) Exostosis 8 (8) Fibromyxoma 3 (3) Glomic tumour 4 (4)”
BackgroundNogueira, H. C., de Lima, T. C., George, S. Z., dos Reis, F. J. J., Dias, D. L. C., Campanha, B. E. S., & Chaves, T. C. (2023) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066199 · Cited by 4
Frisaldi, E., Ferrero, B., Liberto, A. D., Barbiani, D., Camerone, E. M., Piedimonte, A., Vollert, J., Cavallo, R., Zibetti, M., Lopiano, L., et al. (2024) · Muscle & Nerve · doi:10.1002/mus.28189 · Cited by 3
“…This suggests that complex mechanisms underlie the interaction between these two variables: the same individual can simultaneously expect positive outcomes and adverse events, 9 and treatment information is translated into expectations through a non-linear process that differs between individuals.”
Behandlungserwartungen bei postoperativen Schmerzen
Stuhlreyer, J., & Klinger, R. (2021) · Der Schmerz · doi:10.1007/s00482-021-00575-0 · Cited by 3
Somogyi, A., Uca, M., Bulğay, C., Acheampong, E. Y., Marcos, R. D. L. V., Barquín, R. R., & Szabó, A. (2025) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu17040628 · Cited by 2
“To evaluate positive and negative expectations regarding the effects of coffee and energy drinks on sports and exercise performance, the psychometrically validated Stanford Expectations of Treatment Scale (SETS) was employed [24].”
InfluentialProgress, potential and pitfalls of ketamine as a treatment for depression
Orsini, D. K., Luch, S. D. D., Lovell, G. F. M., & Rosenblat, J. D. (2026) · Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1080/14656566.2026.2637587 · Cited by 2
“…blinding using validated tools, including Bang’s Blinding Index [91,92], alongside standardized measures of pretreatment expectancy, such as the Stanford Expectations of Treatment Scale [93], to more accurately disentangle specific contributions of expectancy effects from true treatment outcomes.”
Poppe, C. J., Lyck, L., Bechtold, L., & Repantis, D. (2026) · Brain and Behavior · doi:10.1002/brb3.71544 · Cited by 2
What do patients with Peyronie's disease expect from therapy? A prospective multi‐center study
Schäfer, L., Cremers, J. F., Witschel, B., Schüttfort, V., Nieder, T. O., König, F., Vetterlein, M. W., Gild, P., Dahlem, R., Fisch, M., et al. (2023) · Andrology · doi:10.1111/andr.13538 · Cited by 2
Assessment of treatment expectations in people with suspected endometriosis: A psychometric analysis
Meyrose, A., Basedow, L. A., Hirsing, N., Buchweitz, O., Rief, W., & Nestoriuc, Y. (2024) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.145377.2 · Cited by 2
Emergui, G., Agostinho, M. R., Canaipa, R., & Treister, R. (2025) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2025.112207 · Cited by 2
Jester-Broms, J., Strömbergsson, H., Persson, J., & Bodén, R. (2025) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-025-07115-5 · Cited by 4
“The positive and negative expectation associated with treatment was assessed using the Stanford Expectations of Treatment Scale (SETS) [26].”
Incorporating a New Technology for Patient Education
Wanner, E. T., & Bird, J. L. (2014) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-6046-5.ch011 · Cited by 2
Pinto, H. (2018) · International Journal of Clinical and Developmental Anatomy · doi:10.11648/j.ijcda.20180401.12 · Cited by 2
“From the large amount of dermoscopic parameters assessed, eight signs stood out as very important (Table 2) and were finally included in the score (Table 3) [8-9] A Firefly DE300 dermatoscope, Firefly Global ® , Belmont, USA, was used as per technical specifications.”
MethodRossettini, G., Carlino, E., & Testa, M. (2023) · MSK – Muskuloskelettale Physiotherapie · doi:10.1055/a-2140-6317 · Cited by 1
Assessment of treatment expectations in women with suspected endometriosis: A psychometric analysis
Meyrose, A.-K., Basedow, L., Hirsing, N., Buchweitz, O., Rief, W., & Nestoriuc, Y. (2024) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.145377.1 · Cited by 4
“17,19 24 While single-item measures have been the most popular historically, 20,23,25 recent advances have led to the development of multidimensional treatment-expectation questionnaires.”
Placebo Responses in Trials for Multiple Sclerosis
Gilio, L., Centonze, D., & Bassi, M. S. (2025) · Neurologic Clinics · doi:10.1016/j.ncl.2025.08.004 · Cited by 1
Richardson, C., Chan, C., Macgregor, E., Hare, C., Hannon, B. L., Black, S., Schneider, E., Buchman, D. Z., Wang, S., Rac, V. E., et al. (2025) · Pilot and Feasibility Studies · doi:10.1186/s40814-025-01706-5 · Cited by 1
“…Well-Being Scale (FACIT-Sp) [47]), quality of life (Quality of Life at the End of Life-Cancer Scale (QUAL-EC) [48]), attitudes toward hastened death (Schedule of Attitudes Toward Hastened Death (SAHD) [49]), and treatment expectancy (Stanford Expectation of Treatment Scale (SETS) [50]).”
Zhao, F.-Y., Wang, Y.-M., Fu, Q.-Q., Zhu, J., & Qian, J. (2026) · EXPLORE · doi:10.1016/j.explore.2026.103338 · Cited by 1
Caumo, W., França, B. R., Ehlers, J., Castro, S. M. D. J., Borges, R. B., Hirakata, V. N., Bueno, G. B., Torres, I. L. D. S., & Fregni, F. (2026) · European Journal of Pain · doi:10.1002/ejp.70211 · Cited by 1
“Broader tools developed in medical or psychological contexts (Younger et al. 2012; Laferton et al. 2017; Barth et al. 2019) also lack sensitivity to chronic pain features—including symptom persistence, disability, psychological comorbidities, catastrophizing and central sensitization.”
Wang, Z., Liu, C., Wei, X., Zhang, N., Li, J.-L., Lee, C., Zhou, H., Tu, J., & Wang, X. (2026) · Brain Imaging and Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11682-026-01094-1 · Cited by 1
“The SETS has positive (three items) and negative (three items) facets, and participants are instructed to rate each item on a 7-point Likert scale (Younger et al., 2012).”
Adair, E., Mardian, A. S., Saxena, K., Dorsonne, B., Hailu, A. Y., Heggan, E., Riazi, G., Slater, K., Poupore‐King, H., Clifton, J., et al. (2026) · Pain Medicine · doi:10.1093/pm/pnag027 · Cited by 1
Self-citationBelinger, L., Rieser, N. M., Engeli, E., Becciolini, L., Clamote, M., Pribiš, M., Saissi, F., Florineth, G. A., Hehl, N. L., Herdener, M., et al. (2026) · European Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2026.112879 · Cited by 1
Incorporating a New Technology for Patient Education
Wanner, E. T., & Bird, J. L. (2017) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-2237-9.ch030 · Cited by 1
Creating Placebo Nonresponders in the Lab
Benedetti, F., Arduino, C., Shaibani, A. I., & Thoen, W. (2023) · Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2023.10.017 · Cited by 1
Placebo effects and research quality
Jonas, W. B., Goldman, D. A., Muhammed, S., Mullins, C. D., & Colloca, L. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/med/9780197645444.003.0022 · Cited by 1
Ramfjord, L. S., Kahn, N., Langsrud, K., Halvorsen, J. Ø., Morken, G., Saksvik, S. B., Engvik, L. S. S., Lydersen, S., & Kallestad, H. (2024) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076039 · Cited by 1
Bonomo, Y. A., Norman, A. F., Collins, L., Ross, M., Dwyer, J. L., Perkins, D., & Sarris, J. J. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1545915 · Cited by 4
Leonardi, G., Colonnello, V., Farinelli, M., Bertoletti, E., & Russo, P. M. (2021) · Psychogeriatrics · doi:10.1111/psyg.12719 · Cited by 1
Lawrence, B. J., Eikelboom, R. H., & Jayakody, D. M. P. (2021) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-021-05714-7 · Cited by 1
“cochlear implant and auditory/cognitive rehabilitation) [30].”
Merritt, O. A., Rowa, K., & Purdon, C. L. (2022) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1007/s10608-022-10318-9 · Cited by 1
“As predicted, the TCQ-C subscales showed negative correlations with the positive expectations subscale of the SETS, and positive correlations with the negative expectations subscale of the SETS (see Table 5).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialFrisaldi, E., Barbiani, D., & Benedetti, F. (2017) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/obo/9780199828340-0196 · Cited by 1
Examination of Interventions’ Acceptance
(2021) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119610113.ch11 · Cited by 2
Pain in psoriatic arthritis and hand osteoarthritis
Vela, J. (2021) · doi:10.54337/aau460188407 · Cited by 1
Best Practice Recommendations for Conducting Controlled Trials in Clinical Hypnosis ResearchPreprint
Kekecs, Z., Moss, D., Whorwell, P. J., Varga, K., Terhune, D. B., Shenefelt, P. D., Palsson, O. S., Benedittis, G. D., & Elkins, G. R. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/nv39u · Cited by 1
Poulin, J. M., Bigford, G. E., Lanctôt, K. L., Giacobbe, P., Schaffer, A., Sinyor, M., Rabin, J. S., Masellis, M., Singnurkar, A., Pople, C. B., et al. (2023) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3474764/v1 · Cited by 1
Evers, A., Kelly, C., Noorani, T. N., Love, S., & Heifets, B. D. (2025) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2025.06.30.25330536 · Cited by 1
Applying the EU Regulatory Framework to Determine the Benefit–Risk Profile of Psychedelics
Browne, K., Bałkowiec-Iskra, E., Elferink, A. J. A., Haberkamp, M., Straus, S. M. J. M., Sepodes, B. M. N., Silva, F., Butlen‐Ducuing, F., Jansen, J., Silva, I., et al. (2025) · ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science · doi:10.1021/acsptsci.5c00456 · Cited by 1
Expectations and Outcomes of Genetics Services
McAllister, M. (2013) · Encyclopedia of Life Sciences · doi:10.1002/9780470015902.a0025145
Turning PAGES with Health Coaching and Family Involvement
Bird, J. L., & Wanner, E. T. (2015) · Advances in medical education, research, and ethics (AMERE) book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-9494-1.ch010
Langbach, O. (2017) · NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives
Narratives of Curriculum Design
Bird, J. L. (2019) · Advances in medical diagnosis, treatment, and care (AMDTC) book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-1931-8.ch005
Bird, J. L., & Wanner, E. T. (2019) · Advances in medical diagnosis, treatment, and care (AMDTC) book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-1931-8.ch002
Cuenca‐Martínez, F., Suso‐Martí, L., Cabañas-García, C., & Gil‐Martínez, A. (2019) · Journal of MOVE and Therapeutic Science · doi:10.37382/jomts.v1i1.9
“Es por lo tanto, que la respuesta de un paciente ante un tratamiento va a estar influenciada por las expectativas que el paciente pueda tener o recibir antes de iniciar el mismo (Younger et al., 2012; Faasse & Petrie, 2013).”
BackgroundMeasuring General Expectations of Advanced Stage Treatment Outcomes in Parkinson’s Disease
Loftus, A. M., Nielsen, C., Corti, E. J., STARKSTEIN, S. E., Gasson, N., & Egan, S. J. (2021) · Journal of Parkinson s Disease · doi:10.3233/jpd-212777
“Future research should consider the moderating influence of prior treatment exposure on treatment expectations and outcomes in PD [44].”
Reflections of Healing Narratives
(2021) · Advances in medical diagnosis, treatment, and care (AMDTC) book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-9051-5.ch010
Low Back Pain Physiotherapy: Does Expectation Really Influence Outcome?
Oen, A., Sukmajaya, W. P., Alkaff, F. F., Sukmajaya, A. C., & Inez, S. I. (2022) · Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences · doi:10.3889/oamjms.2022.8578
“Before the therapy began, participants were asked to fulfill a demographic characteristic, ODI [20], and SETS [21] questionnaires.”
MethodTurning PAGES With Health Coaching and Family Involvement
Bird, J. L., & Wanner, E. T. (2018) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-7122-3.ch014
Plank, J. R., Glover, S. C., Moloney, B. D., Hoeh, N. R., Sundram, F., Sumner, R. L., Muthukumaraswamy, S. D., & Lin, J. C. (2022) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1982600/v1
Cockle, S., & Ogden, J. (2023) · Cogent Psychology · doi:10.1080/23311908.2023.2180871
“Existing measures that informed this process include measures of expectations, such as the Stanford Expectations of Treatment Scale (SETS), Younger et al. (2012;)”
MethodAn Open-label Pilot Study of NicoBloc as a Novel Smoking Cessation Intervention
Chichester, K. R., Sisson, M. L., Chana, S. M., Wolford‐Clevenger, C., Hugley, M. J., Hawes, E. S., Palenski, P. E., Nguyen, A., Dahne, J., Hendricks, P. S., et al. (2023) · Journal of Addiction Medicine · doi:10.1097/adm.0000000000001157
(2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/med/9780197645444.002.0006
Vanderijst, L., Hever, F., Buot, A., Dauré, C., Benoit, J., Hanak, C., Veeser, J., Morgiève, M., Campanella, S., Kornreich, C., et al. (2024) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3829237/v1
Azevedo, B. O. (2023) · Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (Universidade de São Paulo) · doi:10.11606/d.17.2023.tde-05012024-154154
Raghuraman, N., & Colloca, L. (2024) · Pain · doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003339
41 Clinical Outcomes in the Treatment of Chronic RhinosinusitisChronic rhinosinusitis (CRS)
(2025) · Thieme Medical Publishers eBooks · doi:10.1055/b-0045-211996
Paschke-Dahl, L., & Klinger, R. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1572761
Sabkova, T., Coenen, V. A., & Schläpfer, T. E. (2025) · Personalized Medicine in Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.pmip.2025.100162
Leveraging Beliefs in Treatment: Outcome Expectancy, Treatment Credibility, and Self-Efficacy
Brier, N., Brown, L. A., & Tyler, J. (2025) · CBT: science into practice · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-91439-3_3
Sun, C., Ling, G., Sun, C.-Q., & Feng, X. (2025) · European Journal of Integrative Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.eujim.2025.102543
Rottstädt, F., Croy, I., Kahle, L., Ramisch, K., & Meißner, W. (2025) · Pain Research and Management · doi:10.1155/prm/6612087
“…concise than the multidimensional TEX-Q [30] and the EXPECT [31] questionnaire, yet—unlike the ultra-brief ETS [32] and the valence-oriented SETS [33]—it captures not only outcome expectations but also process expectations, thereby ofering a broader view of how patients anticipate their…”
Burgos-Bragado, J. M., Jiménez‐Sánchez, C., la Cruz, N. B., Carpallo‐Porcar, B., Le-Roux, L., Blas, J. L., Alamillo-Salas, J., Gimeno, P. G., & Calvo, S. (2025) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2025.09.18.25336078
“Treatment expectancy will be assessed using the Stanford Expectations of Treatment Scale (SETS), a validated self-report instrument designed to measure patients’ beliefs and expectations regarding the effectiveness and potential benefits of a therapeutic intervention [82].”
InfluentialSzabó, A. (2025) · Current Medical Research and Opinion · doi:10.1080/03007995.2025.2595763
“…directions to be considered: (1) Pre-screening for expectancy and prior experience: Incorporating expectancy or experience assessments before trials may help generate functional covariates for analysis, and belief inventories or treatment-expectancy scales 24,25 can provide additional insights.”
Li, J.-L., Liu, C.-Z., Zhang, N., Yan, C.-Q., Tu, J., Wang, L.-Q., Qi, Y.-S., Liu, J.-H., & Wang, X. (2020) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13311189
Plank, J. R., Glover, S. C., Moloney, B. D., Hoeh, N. R., Sundram, F., Sumner, R. L., Muthukumaraswamy, S. D., & Lin, J. C. (2022) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.21251678
Moloney, B. D., Forsyth, A., Sumner, R. L., Glover, S. C., Hoeh, N. R., Sundram, F., Cavadino, A., Muthukumaraswamy, S. D., & Lin, J. C. (2026) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2026.1767654
“The Stanford Expectation of Treatment Scale (SETS) was also used to assess expectancy effects at baseline (Younger et al., 2012).”
Baiardini, I., Caruso, C., Castellani, W., Ricci, A., Michieletto, L., Calabrese, C., Ingrassia, E., Piraino, A., Simoni, L., Ori, A., et al. (2026) · Patient Related Outcome Measures · doi:10.2147/prom.s543501
Fu, W., Liu, Y., Lin, D., Wang, S., Liang, X., Wu, B., Wan, L., Yuanyuan, L., Wang, T., Liu, H., et al. (2026) · Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment · doi:10.2147/ndt.s601078
Peacock, E., Mohundro, B. L., Li, J., BAZZANO, L., Shankar, A., Petty, R., Kegan, R. G., & Krousel-Wood, M. A. (2026) · Contemporary Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/j.cct.2026.108353
Metadata
- Authors
- Younger, J., Gandhi, V., Hubbard, E., & Mackey, S.
- Affiliations
- Stanford Medicine (US)
- Venue
- Clinical Trials
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2012-11-20
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 767-776
- ISSN
- 1740-7745 (ISSN-L)
- 1740-7753
- OpenAlex
- W2020646491
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 69
- Citations by year
- 2026: 27 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 0.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Trials (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- School of Medicine, Stanford University
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- treatment expectancy, patient expectations, placebo effect, expectancy effects, scale development, psychometric validation, surgical treatment, pain interventions, statistical power
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Attitude to Health, Clinical Trials as Topic, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Research Design, Reproducibility of Results, Placebo Effect, Research Subjects
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review