Diet modification challenges faced by marginalized and nonmarginalized adults with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis
Abstract
Objectives Diet modification is an important part of the prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes, but sustained dietary change remains elusive for many individuals. This paper describes and interprets the barriers to diet modification from the perspective of people with type 2 diabetes, paying particular attention to the experiences of people who experience social marginalization. Methods A systematic review of primary, empirical qualitative research was performed, capturing 120 relevant studies published between 2002 and 2015. Qualitative meta-synthesis was used to provide an integrative analysis of this knowledge. Results Due to the central role of food in social life, dietary change affects all aspects of a person's life, and barriers related to self-discipline, emotions, family and social support, social significance of food, and knowledge were identified. These barriers are inter-linked and overlapping. Social marginalization magnifies barriers; people who face social marginalization are trying to make the same changes as other people with diabetes with fewer socio-material resources in the face of greater challenges. Discussion A social-ecological model of behavior supports our findings of challenges at all levels, and highlights the need for interventions and counseling strategies that address the social and environmental factors that shape and sustain dietary change.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The majority of individuals with T2DM are unable to adhere to diabetes management guidelines.
“However, the majority of individuals with T2DM are unable to adhere to the diabetes management guidelines”
The problem of non-adherence to diabetes management guidelines is amplified in populations with low health literacy, higher poverty levels, or in remote rural settings.
“this problem is amplified in populations with low health literacy, higher poverty levels, or in remote rural settings [9-11].”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 143 · Cited by 48
- Authors
- Vanstone, M., Rewegan, A., Brundisini, F., Giacomini, M., Kandasamy, S., & DeJean, D.
- Affiliations
- McMaster University (CA)
- York University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Vanstone, Meredith
- Venue
- Chronic Illness
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2016-11-24
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 217-235
- ISSN
- 1742-3953 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-9206
- OpenAlex
- W2553638797
- Cited by
- 48
- References
- 143
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 0.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Chronic Illness (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Keywords
- type 2 diabetes, dietary change, barriers to dietary change, social marginalization, social support, self-control, emotions, socio-ecological model, diabetes counseling, food and social life
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diet, Diabetic, Female, Humans, Male, Qualitative Research, Social Marginalization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review