Cited by 48Diabetes Management and EducationNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorBehavioral Health and Interventions

Diet modification challenges faced by marginalized and nonmarginalized adults with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis

Vanstone, Meredith, Rewegan, Alex, Brundisini, Francesca, Giacomini, Mita, Kandasamy, Sujane, DeJean, Deirdre·2017·Chronic Illness

Abstract

Objectives Diet modification is an important part of the prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes, but sustained dietary change remains elusive for many individuals. This paper describes and interprets the barriers to diet modification from the perspective of people with type 2 diabetes, paying particular attention to the experiences of people who experience social marginalization. Methods A systematic review of primary, empirical qualitative research was performed, capturing 120 relevant studies published between 2002 and 2015. Qualitative meta-synthesis was used to provide an integrative analysis of this knowledge. Results Due to the central role of food in social life, dietary change affects all aspects of a person's life, and barriers related to self-discipline, emotions, family and social support, social significance of food, and knowledge were identified. These barriers are inter-linked and overlapping. Social marginalization magnifies barriers; people who face social marginalization are trying to make the same changes as other people with diabetes with fewer socio-material resources in the face of greater challenges. Discussion A social-ecological model of behavior supports our findings of challenges at all levels, and highlights the need for interventions and counseling strategies that address the social and environmental factors that shape and sustain dietary change.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1742395316675024

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 143 · Cited by 48

Authors
Vanstone, M., Rewegan, A., Brundisini, F., Giacomini, M., Kandasamy, S., & DeJean, D.
Affiliations
  • McMaster University (CA)
  • York University (CA)
Corresponding author
Vanstone, Meredith
Venue
Chronic Illness
Published
2016-11-24
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
217-235
ISSN
  • 1742-3953 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-9206
OpenAlex
W2553638797
Cited by
48
References
143
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3
FWCI
0.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Chronic Illness (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, dietary change, barriers to dietary change, social marginalization, social support, self-control, emotions, socio-ecological model, diabetes counseling, food and social life
MeSH terms
Adult, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diet, Diabetic, Female, Humans, Male, Qualitative Research, Social Marginalization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review