Cited by 138Public Administration and Political AnalysisLeadership and Management in OrganizationsLeadership, Behavior, and Decision-Making Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Introduction to the special issue: Why the coronavirus crisis is also a crisis of leadership

Open access
Tourish, Dennis·2020·Leadership

Abstract

This editorial introduction argues that the coronavirus crisis is also a crisis of leadership theory and practice. Decision making is particularly hazardous when we have poor evidence to guide us and face unpredictable outcomes. Mainstream leadership theories are of little help, since an environment of radical uncertainty means that leaders have less information, expertise and resources to guide them than is often assumed. Undaunted, populist leaders exploit uncertainty to suggest that simple solutions will work. I suggest that the responses of such leaders have been characterised by incompetent leadership, denialist leadership, panic leadership, othering leadership and authoritarian leadership. I also consider the implications of the crisis for business leadership, suggesting that already strained relationships within organisations are likely to deteriorate still further. Critical leadership studies has an important contribution to make in challenging self-serving theories of business that have come to guide much leadership decision-making. We have an opportunity to do research that really matters, and participate in vital conversations about how the theory and practice of leadership can contribute to better outcomes from the coronavirus crisis, and others still to come.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1742715020929242

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 17 · Cited by 138

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Clearfield C, 2018, Meltdown: Why Our Systems Fail and What We Can Do about It
  2. Foucault M, 1977, Discipline and Punish
  3. Kay J, 2020, Radical Uncertainty: Decision-Making for an Unknowable Future
  4. Kershaw I, 1998, Hitler 1889-1936: Hubris
  5. Pinker S, 2018, Enlightenment Now
  6. Tetlock P, 2005, Expert Political Judgement
  7. 10.5465/amle.2019.0255 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Tourish, D.
Affiliations
University of Sussex (GB)
Corresponding author
Tourish, Dennis
Venue
Leadership
Published
2020-05-26
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
261-272
ISSN
  • 1742-7150 (ISSN-L)
  • 1742-7169
OpenAlex
W3031816121
Cited by
138
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 7
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Leadership (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Sussex Research Online (University of Sussex) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public Administration and Political Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Leadership and Management in Organizations
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Leadership, Behavior, and Decision-Making Studies
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, leadership crisis, radical uncertainty, decision making under uncertainty, populist leadership, authoritarian leadership, corporate leadership, organizational relationships, critical leadership studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Introduction to the special issue: Why the coronavirus crisis is also a crisis of leadership. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1742715020929242
The paper
Tourish, D. (2020). Introduction to the special issue: Why the coronavirus crisis is also a crisis of leadership. Leadership. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715020929242