Cited by 38Hygrothermal properties of building materialsBuilding Energy and Comfort OptimizationBuilding energy efficiency and sustainability

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Temperature Stability of Traditional and Low-cost Modern Housing in the Eastern Cape, South Africa

Makaka, Golden, Meyer, Edson·2006·Journal of Building Physics

Abstract

The aim of this study is to compare the thermal comfort of traditional (Xhosa) huts and low-cost modern houses built under the reconstruction development program (RDP) and the influence of fly ash on brick properties and the indoor environment. A mixing proportion of 50% fly ash produces a brick with lower thermal conductivity and water absorption but with a higher compressive strength, while the clay plasticity decreases with the increase in fly ash. The results indicate that traditional huts offer better thermal comfort than low-cost modern houses, while the fly ash brick house (FABH) has a better thermal performance than the RDP house.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1744259106065674

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Douglas, Balcomb, ‘Solar 98’, 23rd National Passive Solar Conference
  2. De Barrio, E.P., 2003, Theoretical Basis for Empirical Model Validation using Parameters Space Analysis Tools: Buildings and Energies, Renewable Energy, 35, 985
  3. Fisher, D.E., 1997, Convective Heat Transfer in Building Energy and Thermal load Calculations, ASHRAE Transactions, 103, 137
  4. Jongeline, R., 2002, Low Cost Energy Efficient Housing by South African Housing Association
  5. Kaan, H.F., 2001, Housing for a Healthier Future in South Africa, Design Solution for Improving Energy Efficiency
  6. Klunne, W.E., 2004, Energy Use for Space Heating in RDP Houses, a First Indicative Survey
  7. Mithrarane, Kumar, 2004, Thermal Characteristics of High Thermal Mass Passive Solar Buildings
  8. 2005, South Africa Building Manual

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Makaka, G., & Meyer, E.
Affiliations
University of Fort Hare (ZA)
Corresponding author
Makaka, Golden
Venue
Journal of Building Physics
Published
2006-07
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
71-86
ISSN
  • 1097-1963 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-2591
  • 1744-2583
OpenAlex
W2156207343
Cited by
38
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Building Physics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Hygrothermal properties of building materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Building energy efficiency and sustainability
Keywords
thermal comfort, traditional dwellings, low-cost housing, fly ash bricks, thermal conductivity, water absorption, compressive strength, clay plasticity, indoor environment, Eastern Cape

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review