Living through disclosure: a descriptive phenomenological exploration of adult survivors’ experiences of disclosing sexual assault to nurses
Open accessAbstract
Background: Sexual assault affects approximately 1 in 3 women and 1 in 18 men in the United Kingdom (UK), yet disclosure to healthcare professionals remains low. Research has focused on prevalence, barriers and outcomes; survivors’ lived experience of the disclosure encounter is under-explored. Nurses’ responses profoundly shape recovery. Aim: To explore adult survivors’ lived experiences of disclosing sexual assault to nurses in the UK. Methods: Nine adults who had disclosed sexual assault to a nurse in a UK healthcare setting were recruited and interviewed. Data were analysed using Giorgi’s descriptive phenomenological psychology method. Results: Disclosure emerged as temporally complex and emotionally overwhelming, shaped by survivors’ profound unpreparedness and pervasive uncertainty. Two themes captured this: (1) Unpreparedness, reflecting lack of readiness before, during and after disclosure and an overriding need for validation and (2) Not Knowing, capturing uncertainty across the practical, relational and emotional dimensions of disclosure. Running through both themes was survivors’ fear of not being believed, which shaped the meaning of the encounter. Conclusion: Disclosure is a temporally complex, emotionally overwhelming experience fundamentally shaped by nurses’ responses. Belief, validation and agency emerged as central to survivors’ experiences. These findings highlight the importance of trauma-informed education and survivor-centred approaches in nursing practice.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Wieberneit, M., Thal, S., Clare, J., Notebaert, L., & Tubex, H. (2024) · Trauma, Violence, & Abuse · doi:10.1177/15248380241261404 · Cited by 70 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Existing research on SA disclosure has focused predominantly on prevalence rates, barriers to disclosure (Wieberneit et al., 2024) and down-stream healthcare outcomes (Rajan et al., 2021).”
Sexual violence and mental health services: a call to action
Hughes, E., Lucock, M., & Brooker, C. (2019) · Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences · doi:10.1017/s2045796019000040 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Dosdale, C., Bevan, M., & Skarparis, K.
- Affiliations
- Northumbria University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Dosdale, Claire
- Venue
- Journal of Research in Nursing
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2026-09-18
- Pages
- 17449871261476617-17449871261476617
- ISSN
- 1361-4096 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-9871
- 1744-988X
- PMC
- PMC13588952
- OpenAlex
- W7213543605
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of research in nursing (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
- Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
- Keywords
- sexual assault, disclosure, adult survivors, lived experience, uncertainty, validation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review