Cited by 0Sexual Assault and Victimization StudiesIntimate Partner and Family ViolencePatient-Provider Communication in Healthcare

Living through disclosure: a descriptive phenomenological exploration of adult survivors’ experiences of disclosing sexual assault to nurses

Open access
Dosdale, Claire, Bevan, Mark, Skarparis, Katy·2026·Journal of Research in Nursing

Abstract

Background: Sexual assault affects approximately 1 in 3 women and 1 in 18 men in the United Kingdom (UK), yet disclosure to healthcare professionals remains low. Research has focused on prevalence, barriers and outcomes; survivors’ lived experience of the disclosure encounter is under-explored. Nurses’ responses profoundly shape recovery. Aim: To explore adult survivors’ lived experiences of disclosing sexual assault to nurses in the UK. Methods: Nine adults who had disclosed sexual assault to a nurse in a UK healthcare setting were recruited and interviewed. Data were analysed using Giorgi’s descriptive phenomenological psychology method. Results: Disclosure emerged as temporally complex and emotionally overwhelming, shaped by survivors’ profound unpreparedness and pervasive uncertainty. Two themes captured this: (1) Unpreparedness, reflecting lack of readiness before, during and after disclosure and an overriding need for validation and (2) Not Knowing, capturing uncertainty across the practical, relational and emotional dimensions of disclosure. Running through both themes was survivors’ fear of not being believed, which shaped the meaning of the encounter. Conclusion: Disclosure is a temporally complex, emotionally overwhelming experience fundamentally shaped by nurses’ responses. Belief, validation and agency emerged as central to survivors’ experiences. These findings highlight the importance of trauma-informed education and survivor-centred approaches in nursing practice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/17449871261476617

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Dosdale, C., Bevan, M., & Skarparis, K.
Affiliations
Northumbria University (GB)
Corresponding author
Dosdale, Claire
Venue
Journal of Research in Nursing
Published
2026-09-18
Pages
17449871261476617-17449871261476617
ISSN
  • 1361-4096 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-9871
  • 1744-988X
OpenAlex
W7213543605
Cited by
0
References
2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of research in nursing (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Keywords
sexual assault, disclosure, adult survivors, lived experience, uncertainty, validation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review