The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An Agenda for Purely Confirmatory Research
Abstract
The veracity of substantive research claims hinges on the way experimental data are collected and analyzed. In this article, we discuss an uncomfortable fact that threatens the core of psychology's academic enterprise: almost without exception, psychologists do not commit themselves to a method of data analysis before they see the actual data. It then becomes tempting to fine tune the analysis to the data in order to obtain a desired result-a procedure that invalidates the interpretation of the common statistical tests. The extent of the fine tuning varies widely across experiments and experimenters but is almost impossible for reviewers and readers to gauge. To remedy the situation, we propose that researchers preregister their studies and indicate in advance the analyses they intend to conduct. Only these analyses deserve the label "confirmatory," and only for these analyses are the common statistical tests valid. Other analyses can be carried out but these should be labeled "exploratory." We illustrate our proposal with a confirmatory replication attempt of a study on extrasensory perception.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“If hypotheses are included in a preregistration document, then hypothesis generation must have occurred before hypothesis testing (e.g., Centre for Open Science, n. d; ; Nosek et al., 2018; Wagenmakers et al., 2012).”
From Does preregistration improve the credibility of research findings? (2020) · cites this paper as Wagenmakers et al., 2012
Citations
Cites
Kass, R. E., & Raftery, A. E. (1995) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1995.10476572 · Cited by 12,558
Journal of personality and social psychology
Armstrong, J. (1988) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/0169-2070(88)90126-4 · Cited by 10,544
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124 · Cited by 10,505
Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises
Nickerson, R. S. (1998) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175 · Cited by 7,267
Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797611417632 · Cited by 6,567
Wildlife Society (2011) · Wildlife Society Bulletin · doi:10.1002/(issn)1938-5463a · Cited by 5,571
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005) · CHANCE · doi:10.1080/09332480.2005.10722754 · Cited by 4,702 · cited 1×
“confirmatory experiments, wonky statistics, ESP, Bayesian hypothesis test Several years ago, Ioannidis (2005) famously argued that “most published research findings are false.””
Journal of the American Statistical Association
Fildes, R. A. (1989) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/0169-2070(89)90106-4 · Cited by 3,956
Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis
Rouder, J. N., Speckman, P. L., Sun, D., Morey, R. D., & Iverson, G. (2009) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/pbr.16.2.225 · Cited by 3,688
Raise standards for preclinical cancer research
Begley, C. G., & Ellis, L. M. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/483531a · Cited by 2,979 · cited 1×
“And indeed, recent results from biomedical and cancer research suggest that replication rates are lower than 50%, with some as low as 11% (Begley & Ellis, 2012; Osherovich, 2011; Prinz, Schlange, & Asadullah, 2011).”
Result
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Feynman R. P., 1974, Engineering & Science, 37, 10
- Goldacre B., 2009, Bad science
- Jeffreys H., 1961, Theory of probability
- Roediger H. L., 2012, APS Observer, 25, 9
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 998
Forschungstransparenz als hohes wissenschaftliches Gut stärken
Schönbrodt, F. D., Maier, M., Heene, M., & Bühner, M. (2018) · Psychologische Rundschau · doi:10.1026/0033-3042/a000386 · Cited by 12
Cohen, A. S., Chun, R., & Sznycer, D. (2020) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.191922 · Cited by 14
Gorman, D. M., & Ferdinand, A. O. (2020) · Research Integrity and Peer Review · doi:10.1186/s41073-020-00098-9 · Cited by 12
van Witteloostuijn, M., Boersma, P., Wijnen, F. N. K., & Rispens, J. (2021) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s0142716421000102 · Cited by 12
Girard, C., Longo, L., Chesnokova, H., Epinat‐Duclos, J., & Prado, J. (2023) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102328 · Cited by 12
Two Bayesian tests of the GLOMOsys Model.
Field, S. M., Wagenmakers, E., Newell, B. R., Zeelenberg, R., & van Ravenzwaaij, D. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000067 · Cited by 11
Self-citationHengartner, M. P., von Wyl, A., Haldimann, B. H., & Yamanaka, M. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00174 · Cited by 11
Two kinds of theory: What psychology can learn from Einstein
McGann, M., & Speelman, C. P. (2020) · Theory & Psychology · doi:10.1177/0959354320937804 · Cited by 11
Regenwetter, M., Robinson, M. M., & Wang, C. (2022) · Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/25152459221074653 · Cited by 11
The Inner Workings of Registered Reports
Dienes, Z. P. (2024) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009000796.015 · Cited by 11
Tressoldi, P. E., Pederzoli, L., Caini, P., Ferrini, A., Melloni, S., Richeldi, D., Richeldi, F., & Duma, G. M. (2014) · NeuroQuantology · doi:10.14704/nq.2014.12.3.767 · Cited by 11
Hanel, P. H. P. (2016) · ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) · Cited by 11
Outcome Reporting bias in Exercise Oncology trials (OREO): a cross-sectional studyPreprint
Singh, B., Fairman, C. M., Christensen, J. F., Bolam, K. A., Twomey, R., Nunan, D., & Lahart, I. M. (2021) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2021.03.12.21253378 · Cited by 13
“Technology and Human Behavior”
Elson, M., Przybylski, A. K., & Krämer, N. C. (2015) · Journal of Media Psychology Theories Methods and Applications · doi:10.1027/1864-1105/a000170 · Cited by 10
Macpherson, M. C., & Miles, L. K. (2022) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2022.104439 · Cited by 13
Evaluating the Pedagogical Effectiveness of Study Preregistration in the Undergraduate Dissertation
Pownall, M., Pennington, C. R., Norris, E., Juanchich, M., Smailes, D., Russell, P. S., Gooch, D., Evans, T. R., Persson, S., Mak, M. H., et al. (2023) · Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/25152459231202724 · Cited by 16
Nine quick tips for open meta-analyses
Moreau, D., & Wiebels, K. (2024) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012252 · Cited by 11
Gaffaney, J., & Donaldson, S. I. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1548612 · Cited by 10
A framework for assessing the trustworthiness of scientific research findings
Nosek, B. A., Allison, D. B., Jamieson, K. H., Mcnutt, M. K., Nielsen, A. B., & Wolf, S. M. (2026) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2536736123 · Cited by 16
Biondi, F. (2014) · Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.3389/fevo.2014.00050 · Cited by 10
Bakker, M. (2015) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2015.07.006 · Cited by 11
Gronau, Q. F., Duizer, M., Bakker, M., & Wagenmakers, E. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000324 · Cited by 13
Self-citationExercise practice associates with different brain rhythmic patterns during vigilance
Luque‐Casado, A., Ciria, L. F., Sanabria, D., & Perakakis, P. (2020) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2020.113033 · Cited by 9
Differences between decisions made using verbal or numerical quantifiers
Liu, D., Juanchich, M., Sirota, M., & Orbell, S. (2020) · Thinking and Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546783.2020.1720813 · Cited by 12
The Role of Open Science Practices in Scaling Evidence-Based Prevention Programs
Supplee, L. H., Ammerman, R. T., DUGGAN, A. K., List, J. A., & Suskind, D. L. (2021) · Prevention Science · doi:10.1007/s11121-021-01322-8 · Cited by 13
Is the replication crisis a base-rate fallacy?
Autzen, B. (2021) · Metamedicine · doi:10.1007/s11017-022-09561-8 · Cited by 9
Attention Cueing in Rivalry: Insights from Pupillometry
Acquafredda, M., Binda, P., & Lunghi, C. (2022) · eNeuro · doi:10.1523/eneuro.0497-21.2022 · Cited by 11
Research practices and assessment of research misconduct
Hartgerink, C. H. J., & Wicherts, J. M. (2016) · ScienceOpen Research · doi:10.14293/s2199-1006.1.sor-socsci.arysbi.v1 · Cited by 10
Partial awareness can be induced by independent cognitive access to different spatial frequencies
Kim, C., & Chong, S. C. (2021) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104692 · Cited by 10
A Skeptical Eye on PsiPreprint
Wagenmakers, E., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., Kievit, R., & van der Maas, H. L. J. (2020) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/syq2h · Cited by 10
Self-citationThe New Psychology of Expert Witness ProcedurePreprint
Chin, J. M., Roque, M. S., & McFadden, R. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3564796 · Cited by 10
Coretta, S., Casillas, J. V., & Roettger, T. B. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/q8t2k · Cited by 10
Aßmann, L., & Betsch, T. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0284383 · Cited by 9
Profiles in the Teaching of Experimental Design and Analysis
Smucker, B. J., Stevens, N. T., Asscher, J., & Goos, P. (2023) · Journal of Statistics and Data Science Education · doi:10.1080/26939169.2023.2205907 · Cited by 10
Hengartner, M. P. (2017) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00003 · Cited by 9
McVay, M. A., Cooper, K. B., Seoane, M. C., Donahue, M. L., & Scherer, L. D. (2021) · Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1080/21642850.2021.1907186 · Cited by 7
Camilleri, J. A., Eickhoff, S. B., Weis, S., Ji, C., Amunts, J., Sotiras, A., & Genon, S. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-96342-3 · Cited by 9
Personal relative deprivation and pro-environmental intentions
Skylark, W. J., & Callan, M. J. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0259711 · Cited by 11
Keener, S. K., Kepes, S., & Torka, A. (2023) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.104005 · Cited by 12
Fairness Hacking: The Malicious Practice of Shrouding Unfairness in Algorithms
Meding, K., & Hagendorff, T. (2024) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-023-00679-8 · Cited by 13
Muskens, M., Frankenhuis, W. E., & Borghans, L. (2024) · npj Science of Learning · doi:10.1038/s41539-024-00228-8 · Cited by 13
Syed, M. (2025) · Journal of Trial and Error · doi:10.36850/e5ce-4cc5 · Cited by 20
Enabling Confirmatory Secondary Data Analysis by Logging Data Checkout
Scott, K. M., & Struhl, M. K. (2019) · Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2515245918815849 · Cited by 13
A Plea for Preregistration in Personality Disorders Research: The Case of Psychopathy
Verschuère, B., Yasrebi, F., van Zelm, I., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2019) · Journal of Personality Disorders · doi:10.1521/pedi_2019_33_426 · Cited by 10
Joy and rigor in behavioral science
Collins, H. K., Whillans, A. V., & John, L. K. (2021) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2021.03.002 · Cited by 9
Shedding light on functional near-infrared spectroscopy and open science practices
Kelsey, C. M., Taylor, J., Pirazzoli, L., Lorenzo, R. D., Sullivan, E., & Nelson, C. A. (2023) · Neurophotonics · doi:10.1117/1.nph.10.2.023520 · Cited by 10
Cook, B. G. (2016) · Behavioral Disorders · doi:10.17988/0198-7429-41.3.161 · Cited by 9
Die Vertrauenskrise empirischer Forschung in der Psychologie
Schweizer, G., & Furley, P. (2016) · Zeitschrift für Sportpsychologie · doi:10.1026/1612-5010/a000171 · Cited by 9
Semenova, O., Lightbody, G., O’Toole, J. M., Boylan, G. B., Dempsey, E. M., & Temko, A. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0199587 · Cited by 9
Dealing with Distributional Assumptions in Preregistered Research
Williams, M. N., & Albers, C. J. (2019) · Meta-Psychology · doi:10.15626/mp.2018.1592 · Cited by 9
Charting the Constellation of Science Reform
Field, S. M. (2022) · Liberate Science GmbH eBooks · doi:10.53962/meeb-2ktd · Cited by 11
Are Speeded Tests Unfair? Modeling the Impact of Time Limits on the Gender Gap in Mathematics
Stoevenbelt, A. H., Wicherts, J. M., Flore, P. C., Phillips, L. A. T., Pietschnig, J., Verschuère, B., Voracek, M., & Schwabe, I. (2022) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/00131644221111076 · Cited by 11
Four Requirements for an Acceptable Research Program
Marsman, M., Ly, A., & Wagenmakers, E. (2016) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/01973533.2016.1221349 · Cited by 8
Self-citationKról, M. E., & Ferenc, K. (2019) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-019-01163-9 · Cited by 8
Zainuri, Z., Mahardiyanto, A. M., & Rohmah, R. M. (2021) · e-Journal Ekonomi Bisnis dan Akuntansi · doi:10.19184/ejeba.v8i1.23215 · Cited by 8
Chen, J., Kwan, C., Yeung, L. Y., Choi, H. Y., Lo, Y. C., Au, S. Y., Tsang, C. H., Cheng, B., & Feldman, G. (2021) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104154 · Cited by 15
Storm, L., & Tressoldi, P. E. (2023) · Journal of Scientific Exploration · doi:10.31275/20232967 · Cited by 13
Die New Statistics in der Psychologie
Schäfer, T. (2018) · Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie · doi:10.1026/0049-8637/a000184 · Cited by 8
An Empirical Study of Downstream Analysis Effects of Model Pre-Processing Choices
Rudd, J., & Ray, H. G. (2020) · Open Journal of Statistics · doi:10.4236/ojs.2020.105046 · Cited by 8
Anderson, R. B., Crawford, J. C., & Bailey, M. H. (2021) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-021-01618-1 · Cited by 7
Ciria, L. F., Quintero, M. J., López, F. J., Luque, D., Cobos, P. L., & Morís, J. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0256210 · Cited by 8
Open Science, Replicability, and Transparency in Modelling
Prike, T. (2021) · Methodos series · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-83039-7_10 · Cited by 12
Review of Four Preregistration Registries for Special Education Researchers
Fleming, J. I., McLucas, A. S., & Cook, B. G. (2023) · Remedial and Special Education · doi:10.1177/07419325231160293 · Cited by 12
Spitzer, L., & Mueller, S. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0253950 · Cited by 7
Hardwicke, T. E., & Shanks, D. R. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1608235113 · Cited by 8
Toward Transparent Reporting of Psychological Science
LeBel, E. P., & John, L. K. (2017) · doi:10.1002/9781119095910.ch5 · Cited by 8
Validating a Standardized Approach to the Taylor Aggression ParadigmPreprint
Chester, D. S., & Lasko, E. N. (2018) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/k24h8 · Cited by 13
Hoffmann, S., Schönbrodt, F. D., Elsas, R., Wilson, R., Strasser, U., & Boulesteix, A. (2020) · MetArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31222/osf.io/afb9p · Cited by 8
Charting the Constellation of Science Reform
Field, S. M. (2022) · University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) · doi:10.33612/diss.229114775 · Cited by 23
Fitzpatrick, B. G., Gorman, D. M., & Trombatore, C. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0303262 · Cited by 7
Generalizability of choice architecture interventions
Szászi, B., Goldstein, D. G., Soman, D., & Michie, S. (2025) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-025-00471-9 · Cited by 15
Pain vs. comfort diary: A fully remote app‐based experiment
Gruszka, P., Stammen, C., Bissantz, N., & Jensen, M. P. (2019) · European Journal of Pain · doi:10.1002/ejp.1446 · Cited by 6
Conditional Objectivism: A Strategy for Connecting the Social Sciences and Practical Decision-Making
Reber, R., & Bullot, N. J. (2019) · Theory and History in the Human and Social Sciences · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-33099-6_5 · Cited by 7
Phaf, R. H. (2024) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1177/10892680241235120 · Cited by 8
Eye movement differences when recognising and learning moving and static faces
Butcher, N. L., Bennetts, R. J., Sexton, L., Barbanta, A., & Lander, K. (2024) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/17470218241252145 · Cited by 8
Pupillometry indexes ocular dominance plasticity
Acquafredda, M., & Binda, P. (2024) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2024.108449 · Cited by 7
Yuan, K. (2016) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.1213 · Cited by 7
Does it actually feel right? A replication attempt of the rounded price effect
Harms, C., Genau, H. A., Meschede, C., & Beauducel, A. (2018) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.171127 · Cited by 10
The five factor model and infidelity: Beyond the broad domains
van Zyl, C. J. J. (2020) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2020.110553 · Cited by 11
Beer, J. S., Eastwick, P. W., & Goh, J. X. (2023) · Social Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.32872/spb.9681 · Cited by 9
Brain-to-Brain (mind-to-mind) interaction at distance: a confirmatory study
Tressoldi, P. E., Pederzoli, L., Bilucaglia, M., Caini, P., Fedele, P., Ferrini, A., Melloni, S., Richeldi, D., Richeldi, F., & Accardo, A. (2014) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.4336.3 · Cited by 7
Madurski, C., & LeBel, E. P. (2014) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-014-0757-4 · Cited by 7
Heino, M. T. J., Knittle, K. P., Haukkala, A., Vasankari, T. J., & Hankonen, N. E. (2018) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-018-6121-2 · Cited by 5
Gladwin, T. E. (2018) · International Journal for Educational Integrity · doi:10.1007/s40979-018-0034-9 · Cited by 7
Pu, X., Zhu, L., Kay, M., & Conrad, F. G. (2019) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3290607.3312862 · Cited by 8
Unburdening the Shoulders of Giants: A Quest for Disconnected Academic Psychology
Krpan, D. (2020) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691620904775 · Cited by 8
A Two-Stage Bayesian Sequential Assessment of Exploratory Hypotheses
Stefan, A. M., Lengersdorff, L., & Wagenmakers, E. (2022) · Collabra Psychology · doi:10.1525/collabra.40350 · Cited by 7
Self-citationHengartner, M. P., & Yamanaka, M. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00009 · Cited by 7
Efficiently Exploring Multilevel Data with Recursive Partitioning
Martin, D. P. (2015) · doi:10.18130/v3ps0f · Cited by 7
Data from a pre-publication independent replication initiative examining ten moral judgement effects
Tierney, W., Schweinsberg, M., Jordan, J., Kennedy, D. M., Qureshi, I., Sommer, S. A., Thornley, N., Madan, N., Vianello, M., Awtrey, E. C., et al. (2016) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/sdata.2016.82 · Cited by 7
Self-citationPu, X., & Kay, M. (2018) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/4jbh2 · Cited by 7
Masouleh, S. K., Eickhoff, S. B., & Genon, S. (2020) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2020.01.10.901181 · Cited by 7
Reproducibility and Registration in Sexuality Research
Lorenz, T. K. (2020) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-020-01650-w · Cited by 7
Minimizing Mistakes In Psychological SciencePreprint
Rouder, J. N., Haaf, J. M., & Snyder, H. K. (2018) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/gxcy5 · Cited by 10
Jankowsky, K., Zimmermann, J., Jaeger, U., Mestel, R., & Schroeders, U. (2024) · Psychotherapy Research · doi:10.1080/10503307.2024.2411985 · Cited by 7
Attitude to ambiguity as a predictor of analytic thinking
van Zyl, C. J. J. (2020) · South African Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1177/0081246320953715 · Cited by 7
Langenberg, B., Wurpts, I. C., Geuke, G. G. M., & Onghena, P. (2022) · Evaluation & the Health Professions · doi:10.1177/01632787211067533 · Cited by 7
Quintero, M. J., Morís, J., & López, F. J. (2023) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/17470218231165373 · Cited by 8
Douven, I. (2023) · Journal of Mathematical Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2023.102794 · Cited by 7
Himmels, C., Weigl, K., Riener, A., & Venrooij, J. (2023) · Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science · doi:10.1080/1463922x.2023.2286478 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Wagenmakers, E.-J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H. L. J., & Kievit, R. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Amsterdam (NL)
- Venue
- Perspectives on Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2012-11
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 632-638
- ISSN
- 1745-6916 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-6924
- OpenAlex
- W2123263696
- Cited by
- 1,042
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 57 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 85 · 2022: 102 · 2021: 108 · 2020: 114 · 2019: 98 · 2018: 88 · 2017: 86 · 2016: 75 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 44.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Perspectives on Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Keywords
- preregistration, confirmatory analysis, exploratory analysis, data snooping, statistical validity, research integrity, extrasensory perception, replication, hypothesis testing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review