Cited by 220Intergenerational and Educational Inequality StudiesIncome, Poverty, and InequalitySocial and Intergroup Psychology

Building a More Mobile America—One Income Quintile at a Time

Davidai, Shai, Gilovich, Thomas·2015·Perspectives on Psychological Science

Abstract

A core tenet of the American ethos is that there is considerable economic mobility. Americans seem willing to accept vast financial inequalities as long as they believe that everyone has the opportunity to succeed. We examined whether people’s beliefs about the amount of economic mobility in the contemporary United States conform to reality. We found that (a) people believe there is more upward mobility than downward mobility; (b) people overestimate the amount of upward mobility and underestimate the amount of downward mobility; (c) poorer individuals believe there is more mobility than richer individuals; and (d) political affiliation influences perceptions of economic mobility, with conservatives believing that the economic system is more dynamic—with more people moving both up and down the income distribution—than liberals do. We discuss how these findings can shed light on the intensity and nature of political debate in the United States on economic inequality and opportunity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1745691614562005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 61 · Cited by 220

Authors
Davidai, S., & Gilovich, T.
Affiliations
Cornell University (US)
Venue
Perspectives on Psychological Science
Published
2015-01
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
60-71
ISSN
  • 1745-6916 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-6924
OpenAlex
W1963500368
Cited by
220
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4
FWCI
59.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Perspectives on Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Income, Poverty, and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
economic mobility, upward mobility, downward mobility, income inequality, political affiliation, income quintiles, economic opportunities
MeSH terms
Culture, Humans, Income, Politics, Socioeconomic Factors, Thinking, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review