Cited by 202Income, Poverty, and InequalitySocial and Intergroup PsychologySocial Policy and Reform Studies

Income Mobility Breeds Tolerance for Income Inequality: Cross-National and Experimental Evidence

Shariff, Azim F., Wiwad, Dylan, Aknin, Lara B.·2016·Perspectives on Psychological Science

Abstract

American politicians often justify income inequality by referencing the opportunities people have to move between economic stations. Though past research has shown associations between income mobility and resistance to wealth redistribution policies, no experimental work has tested whether perceptions of mobility influence tolerance for inequality. In this article, we present a cross-national comparison showing that income mobility is associated with tolerance for inequality and experimental work demonstrating that perceptions of higher mobility directly affect attitudes toward inequality. We find support for both the prospect of upward mobility and the view that peoples’ economic station is the product of their own efforts, as mediating mechanisms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1745691616635596

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The effect of the manipulation of perceived income mobility on tolerance for inequality was mediated by the expectation that respondents' children would be upwardly mobile and by perceptions of the degree to which someone's economic standing was the result of effort rather than luck.

    “the effect of their manipulation of perceived income mobility on tolerance for inequality was mediated by two factors: the expectation that respondents’ children would be upwardly mobile; and perceptions of the degree to which someone's economic standing was the result of effort, rather than luck.”

    From The psychology of social class: How socioeconomic status impacts thought, feelings, and behaviour (2018) · cites this paper as Shariff, Wiwad, and Aknin (2016)

  • Higher perceived mobility leads to greater acceptance of income inequality.

    “higher perceived mobility leads to greater acceptance of income inequality.”

    From The psychology of social class: How socioeconomic status impacts thought, feelings, and behaviour (2018) · cites this paper as Shariff, Wiwad, and Aknin (2016)

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 202

Authors
Shariff, A. F., Wiwad, D., & Aknin, L. B.
Affiliations
  • University of Oregon (US)
  • Simon Fraser University (CA)
Corresponding author
Shariff, Azim F.
Venue
Perspectives on Psychological Science
Published
2016-05
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
373-380
ISSN
  • 1745-6916 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-6924
OpenAlex
W2401836676
Cited by
202
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 2
FWCI
51.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Perspectives on Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Income, Poverty, and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Social Policy and Reform Studies
Keywords
income mobility, income inequality, upward mobility, attitudes toward inequality, wealth redistribution, cross-national comparison, political attitudes
MeSH terms
Humans, Income, Personal Satisfaction, Social Mobility, Social Perception, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review