A complex network perspective on clinical science
Open accessAbstract
Contemporary classification systems for mental disorders assume that abnormal behaviors are expressions of latent disease entities. An alternative to the latent disease model is the complex network approach. Instead of assuming that symptoms arise from an underlying disease entity, the complex network approach holds that disorders exist as systems of interrelated elements of a network. This approach also provides a framework for the understanding of therapeutic change. Depending on the structure of the network, change can occur abruptly once the network reaches a critical threshold (the tipping point). Homogeneous and highly connected networks often recover more slowly from local perturbations when the network approaches the tipping point, potentially making it possible to predict treatment change, relapse, and recovery. In this article, we discuss the complex network approach as an alternative to the latent disease model and its implications for classification, therapy, relapse, and recovery.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Anxiety and ABs may emerge from an imbalance between threat salience evaluation and cognitive control processes, described at both cognitive and neural network levels.
“Anxiety and ABs may emerge from an imbalance between threat salience evaluation and cognitive control processes, described at both cognitive and neural network levels [115,118-121].”
From Anxiety and Threat-Related Attention: Cognitive-Motivational Framework and Treatment (2018) · cites this paper as [121]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 50 · Cited by 366
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Thom R 1977 Structural stability, catastrophe theory, and applied mathematics Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics Review 19 189 201
- Vandervert LR 1991 Society for chaos theory in psychology holds its inaugural conference The Social Dynamics 2 9 10
- Authors
- Hofmann, S. G., Curtiss, J., & McNally, R. J.
- Affiliations
- Boston University (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hofmann, Stefan G.
- Venue
- Perspectives on Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2016-09
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 597-605
- ISSN
- 1745-6916 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-6924
- PMC
- PMC5119747
- OpenAlex
- W2527609546
- Cited by
- 366
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 45 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 35.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Perspectives on Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- OpenBU (Boston University) (submittedVersion)
- OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Otsuka America Pharmaceutical
- Otsuka America
- Otsuka Pharmaceutical
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH099021, R34MH086668, R21MH102646, R34MH099311, R21MH101567, K23MH100259)
- National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (R01AT007257)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- complex networks, mental illness, symptom networks, therapeutic change, tipping points, network restoration, recurrence prediction, recovery prediction, psychiatric classification, network centrality
- MeSH terms
- Mental Disorders, Humans, Models, Theoretical
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review