The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis: An Evaluation of Selection Methods and Some Cautionary Notes
Open accessAbstract
We review and evaluate selection methods, a prominent class of techniques first proposed by Hedges (1984) that assess and adjust for publication bias in meta-analysis, via an extensive simulation study. Our simulation covers both restrictive settings as well as more realistic settings and proceeds across multiple metrics that assess different aspects of model performance. This evaluation is timely in light of two recently proposed approaches, the so-called p-curve and p-uniform approaches, that can be viewed as alternative implementations of the original Hedges selection method approach. We find that the p-curve and p-uniform approaches perform reasonably well but not as well as the original Hedges approach in the restrictive setting for which all three were designed. We also find they perform poorly in more realistic settings, whereas variants of the Hedges approach perform well. We conclude by urging caution in the application of selection methods: Given the idealistic model assumptions underlying selection methods and the sensitivity of population average effect size estimates to them, we advocate that selection methods should be used less for obtaining a single estimate that purports to adjust for publication bias ex post and more for sensitivity analysis—that is, exploring the range of estimates that result from assuming different forms of and severity of publication bias.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“Consistent with those findings, the relative probabilities estimated by selection method analyses (e.g., McShane et al., 2016) also suggest a general lack of publication bias.”
From Examining domains of psychological flexibility and inflexibility as treatment mechanisms in acceptance and commitment therapy: A comprehensive systematic and meta-analytic review (2024) · cites this paper as McShane et al., 2016
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“On the other hand, this could also be an overestimate of average study power, as heterogeneity in effect sizes can cause the p-curve to overestimate mean power (Brunner & Schimmack, 2020; McShane et al., 2016).”
From Do Salient Social Norms Moderate Mortality Salience Effects? A (Challenging) Meta-Analysis of Terror Management Studies (2023) · cites this paper as McShane et al., 2016
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“we ran selection method analyses for each meta-analytic effect using R functions developed and validated by McShane et al. (2016).”
From Examining domains of psychological flexibility and inflexibility as treatment mechanisms in acceptance and commitment therapy: A comprehensive systematic and meta-analytic review (2024) · cites this paper as McShane et al., 2016
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“However, the credibility of such results is contingent on a lack of selective reporting or on the ability to effectively correct for missing evidence (McShane et al., 2016; Stanley and Doucouliagos, 2014).”
From Investigating the replicability of preclinical cancer biology (2021) · cites this paper as McShane et al., 2016
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In general, cumulative or meta-analytic evidence obtained from multiple independently conducted experiments provides a better basis for assessing the reliability of findings than evidence from a single experiment.”
From Investigating the replicability of preclinical cancer biology (2021) · cites this paper as McShane et al., 2016
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“p-uniform does not model heterogeneity, and this can lead it to overestimate the average effect size of all studies (McShane et al., 2016).”
From Do Salient Social Norms Moderate Mortality Salience Effects? A (Challenging) Meta-Analysis of Terror Management Studies (2023) · cites this paper as McShane et al., 2016
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Bias adjustments can improve performance relative to a meta-analysis that does not adjust for publication bias (Carter et al., 2019; McShane et al., 2016; Moreno et al., 2009; Simonsohn et al., 2014).”
From Do Salient Social Norms Moderate Mortality Salience Effects? A (Challenging) Meta-Analysis of Terror Management Studies (2023) · cites this paper as McShane et al., 2016
In the citing paper
“Statisticians have proposed several statistical approaches to assess how robust meta-analyses are to various assumptions about the extent and nature of missing results, including trim-andfill 67 , selection models 68 , and regression-based adjustment methods 69 .”
From Investigating and dealing with publication bias and other reporting biases in meta-analyses of health research: a review (2021) · cites this paper as [69]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2000) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 355,893
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 · Cited by 56,722
Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias
Begg, C. B., & Mazumdar, M. (1994) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2533446 · Cited by 16,955
Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00455.x · Cited by 14,099
The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.
Rosenthal, R. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638 · Cited by 9,068 · cited 2×
“…& Mazumdar, 1994; Egger, Smith, Schneider, & Minder, 1997; Sterne & Egger, 2005), Rosenthal’s fail-safe N method and its many variants (Becker, 2005; Rosenthal, 1979), the trim-and-fill method (Duval, 2005; Duval & Tweedie, 2000a, 2000b), and the Precision-Effect Test– Precision-Effect Estimate…”
Journal of The American Statistical Association
Fienberg, S. E. (2004) · Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences · doi:10.1002/0471667196.ess1317 · Cited by 6,289
Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2015) · doi:10.4135/9781483398105 · Cited by 5,542
Cohen, J. (1994) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.49.12.997 · Cited by 4,003
A Nonparametric “Trim and Fill” Method of Accounting for Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis
Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.2000.10473905 · Cited by 2,955
Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis: Prevention, Assessment and Adjustments
(2005) · doi:10.1002/0470870168 · Cited by 2,368
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Boyle R., 1965, The sceptical chymist
- Ferriar J., 1792, Medical histories and reflection
- Fisher Ronald A, 1938, Sankhya, 4, 14
- Sterling T. D., 1959, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 54, 30
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–392 of 392
Risk and protective factors for (internet) gaming disorder: A meta-analysisPreprint
Ropovik, I., Martončik, M., Babinčák, P., Baník, G., Vargová, L., & Adamkovic, M. (2022) · Addictive Behaviours · doi:10.31234/osf.io/pg3rf · Cited by 3
Publication Bias in Meta-Analyses from Psychology and Medicine: A Meta-Meta-AnalysisPreprint
van Aert, R. C. M., Wicherts, J. M., & van Assen, M. A. L. M. (2017) · MetArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31222/osf.io/czdp3 · Cited by 4
Leung, D. K. Y., Wong, D. H. S., Wong, F. H. C., Wong, S. M. Y., Chan, O. L. H., Wong, G. H. Y., Chan, W. C., & Lum, T. Y. S. (2025) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2025.119756 · Cited by 2
Advice Response Theory: A Meta-Analytic Review
Vu, N. C., Li, Y., & High, A. C. (2025) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/00936502251351041 · Cited by 2
Hu, Q., Xu, C., Jiang, Y., Hu, Y., Wang, Y., Ren, H., Huang, Y., Buschkuehl, M., Jaeggi, S. M., & Zhang, Q. (2025) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-025-10091-7 · Cited by 4
Katz, B. A., Mutlu, M., Kharbanda, A. A., Kurade, P., & Shenkman, G. (2025) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102686 · Cited by 3
Lauterbach, A. S., & Borge, R. H. (2026) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1111/joop.70099 · Cited by 3
Meta-analyses in management and marketing: Current practices and inferential consequences
Wu, W., & Reed, W. R. (2026) · Australian Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/03128962261443442 · Cited by 2
Behavioral activation for depression: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis
Cuijpers, P. J., Čihařová, M., Tong, L., Liu, Y., Sprenger, A. A., Miguel, C., Karyotaki, E., & Harrer, M. (2026) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2026.102783 · Cited by 2
On the Accuracy of Replication Failure Rates
Schauer, J. M. (2022) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273171.2022.2066500 · Cited by 3
Ni, H., Price, P. C., & Jones, C. J. (2024) · School Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/2372966x.2024.2365618 · Cited by 2
Cumulative Evidence Synthesis and Consideration of “Research Waste” Using Bayesian Methods
Corcoran, H., & Steele, J. (2024) · Communications in Kinesiology · doi:10.51224/cik.2024.74 · Cited by 3
Beyond PRISMA 2020 and AMSTAR 2: Further Actions Are Needed to Deal With Problematic Meta‐Analyses
Baveye, P. C. (2025) · Learned Publishing · doi:10.1002/leap.1666 · Cited by 4
Glaucoma and Risk of Fractures: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Network Meta-Analysis
Afflitto, G. G., Aiello, F., Swaminathan, S. S., Matarazzo, F., Stuart, K. V., Khawaja, A. P., Costagliola, C., & Nucci, C. (2025) · Journal of Glaucoma · doi:10.1097/ijg.0000000000002613 · Cited by 2
Replicability and Meta-Analysis
Schauer, J. M. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-04968-2_14 · Cited by 3
Identifying the superior surgical procedure for endometrial cancer
Yin, M., Cai, Y., & Zhou, L. (2019) · Medicine · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000016855 · Cited by 2
Kingkaew, P., Glidewell, L., Walwyn, R. E. A., Fraser, H., & Wyatt, J. C. (2017) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/s13643-017-0591-7 · Cited by 2
Dissertation R.C.M. van AertPreprint
van Aert, R. C. M. (2018) · MetArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31222/osf.io/eqhjd · Cited by 3
Examining Psychological Science through Systematic Meta-Method Analysis: A Call for ResearchPreprint
Elson, M. (2019) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/cfbzt · Cited by 2
Examining Psychological Science through Systematic Meta-Method Analysis: A Call for ResearchPreprint
Elson, M. (2019) · MetArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31222/osf.io/cj7xf · Cited by 2
Bruntsch, M., Cooper, S. E., Abend, R., Boor, M., Chalkia, A., Ehlers, M. R., Czeszumski, A., Johnson, D. C., Klingelhöfer-Jens, M., Morriss, J., et al. (2024) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/unx7w · Cited by 5
Physical appearance improvements increase prosocial behavior
Kononov, N., Ein‐Gar, D., & Puntoni, S. (2024) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2024.09.001 · Cited by 2
Hall, J. A., & Miller, D. I. (2024) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009170123.028 · Cited by 1
Meta-Analysis in Clinical Research: An Overview of the Statistics of Evidence Synthesis
Gopal, S. H., Hagan, J. L., & Pammi, M. (2025) · Hospital Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/hpeds.2024-008223 · Cited by 1
Ignoring criticisms of meta-analyses and systematic reviews is a risky strategy
Baveye, P. C. (2025) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-025-07646-6 · Cited by 3
Ekeocha, D. O., & Garikipati, S. (2025) · The Energy Journal · doi:10.1177/01956574251340007 · Cited by 1
Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis with Continuous Outcomes: A Comparative Study
Almalik, O. (2025) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math13213487 · Cited by 3
Principles of nostalgia: Meta-analytic tests
Weingarten, E., Wei, Z., Wildschut, T., & Sedikides, C. (2026) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2026.104891 · Cited by 1
Uhlendorf, K., Uhrich, S., & Völckner, F. (2026) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2026.04.003 · Cited by 2
Fifty Years of Anchoring Effects: A Theoretical Reintegration and Meta-Analysis
Schley, D. R., & Weingarten, E. (2026) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2023.03238 · Cited by 2
Chen, Y., Wang, Y., Zhang, Y., & Chen, C. (2026) · International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction · doi:10.1007/s11469-026-01675-7 · Cited by 1
Čihařová, M., Cuijpers, P. J., Harrer, M., Hirshler, Y., Panagiotopoulou, O.-M., Tong, L., Miguel, C., Frankova, I., Gemmill, A. W., Buntrock, C., et al. (2026) · Internet Interventions · doi:10.1016/j.invent.2026.100993 · Cited by 1
Discussion on “Quantifying Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis” by Lin and Chu
Geller, N. L. (2017) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/biom.12818 · Cited by 1
Copas’ method is sensitive to different mechanisms of publication bias
Almalik, O., Zhan, Z. Z., & van den Heuvel, E. R. (2022) · Statistics & Probability Letters · doi:10.1016/j.spl.2022.109733 · Cited by 1
Infinite diameter confidence sets in Hedges’ publication bias model
Moss, J. (2022) · Journal of the Korean Statistical Society · doi:10.1007/s42952-022-00169-1 · Cited by 1
Poecze, F., & Tjoa, A. M. (2020) · International Conference on Informatics and Computational Sciences (ICICoS) · doi:10.1109/icicos51170.2020.9299055 · Cited by 1
Importance of well-designed meta-analyses in assessing medical and surgical treatments
Au, S. C. L. (2023) · World Journal of Meta-Analysis · doi:10.13105/wjma.v11.i7.313 · Cited by 1
Bruns, A. K., Henriksson, I., Nordström, T., & Carlsson, R. (2024) · Campbell Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/cl2.1389
Tsega, T. D., Molla, A., Dessie, T. M., Adane, B., Yalew, M., Ahmed, A. F., Mehari, M. G., Bayeh, G. M., Yeshiwas, A. G., Yizengaw, M. A., et al. (2024) · Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics · doi:10.1080/21645515.2024.2350815 · Cited by 1
The inconsistency of p-curve: Testing its reliability using the power pose and HPA debates
Montoya, R. M., Kershaw, C., & Jurgens, C. T. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0305193 · Cited by 1
Ding, J., Shi, Y., Yu, Q., Sun, S., Liu, H., Zhou, W., Zhao, W., Zhao, Q., & Jiang, S. (2024) · The Journal of Creative Behavior · doi:10.1002/jocb.1508 · Cited by 3
Stress Regulation via Being in Nature and Social Support in Adults, a Meta-analysisPreprint
Sparacio, A., Ropovik, I., Jiga‐Boy, G. M., Cem, A., & IJzerman, H. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/a4zmj · Cited by 1
Supplemental Material for Risk Factors for Child Sexual Abuse Victimization: A Meta-Analytic Review
(2019) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000188.supp · Cited by 2
Boudesseul, J., Gildersleeve, K. A., Haselton, M. G., & Bègue, L. (2018) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/k8s5y · Cited by 2
Supplemental Material for Effects of Action Video Game Play on Cognitive Skills: A Meta-Analysis
Bediou, B., Rodgers, M. A., Tipton, E., Mayer, R. E., Green, C. S., & Bavelier, D. (2023) · Technology Mind and Behavior · doi:10.1037/tmb0000102.supp · Cited by 4
Fernandes, D., Lynch, J. G., & Kim, L. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5385386 · Cited by 1
Markon, K. E. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316995808.036
Pritz-Mirtakis, J. (2020) · Sigmund Freud PrivatUniversität Wien (SFU) · doi:10.15135/2020.8.1.67-83
Li, P. (2021) · Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) · doi:10.33540/846
Towards Theory Formalization in (Social) Embodiment: A Tutorial
Szabelska, A., Dujols, O., Erle, T. M., Sparacio, A., & IJzerman, H. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-78471-3_15 · Cited by 2
(2021) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119558378.ref
General Analytic Considerations
Wright, A. G. C., & Hallquist, M. N. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316995808.034
vanAert_Niemeyer21Preprint
van Aert, R. C. M., & Niemeyer, H. (2020) · MetArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31222/osf.io/3rdys
Carpenter, C. J. (2020) · The International Encyclopedia of Media Psychology · doi:10.1002/9781119011071.iemp0033
Tong, L., Panagiotopoulou, O. M., Cuijpers, P. J., & Karyotaki, E. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4670508
Lapteva, A., & Martarelli, C. (2024) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/bf8rn
A Methodological Evaluation of Meta-Analyses in tDCS - Motor Learning ResearchPreprint
Alsalti, T., Hussey, I., Elson, M., Krause, R. W., & Pohl, S. (2024) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2024.07.26.24311068
Relationship between parental involvement and school readiness: a meta-analysisPreprint
Cui, S., Ropovik, I., & Greger, D. (2024) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/t4we2
Child maltreatment and interoception: A meta-analytic reviewPreprint
Ditzer, J., Woll-Weber, C. F. J., Burger, C., Ernst, A., Boehm, I., Garthus‐Niegel, S., & Zietlow, A. (2024) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/n8tpc
Coya, M. Z. F., Ruhomally, Y. B., Kurmally, M. S., & Dauhoo, M. Z. (2025) · International Journal of Green Energy · doi:10.1080/15435075.2025.2509118
Selvitopu, A., Kaya, M., & Aydın, A. T. (2025) · Research in Educational Administration & Leadership · doi:10.30828/real.1586079 · Cited by 1
Construct validity of the Child Abuse Potential Inventory: A meta-analytic review
Milner, J. S., Ammar, J., Gibson, C., Menon, S. V., & Crouch, J. L. (2025) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2025.107586 · Cited by 1
Espinoza, J. A., Allen, N. J., Su, S., & Thompson, B. (2025) · Team Performance Management · doi:10.1108/tpm-02-2024-0014
Fernandes, D., Lynch, J. G., & Kim, L. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5772062
Falahati, G., Biglarian, A., Behboudi‐Gandevani, S., & Yarandi, R. B. (2025) · Health Science Reports · doi:10.1002/hsr2.71626
Chiocchia, V., Nikolakopoulou, A., Higgins, J. P. T., Page, M. J., Papakonstantinou, T., Cipriani, A., Furukawa, T. A., Siontis, G. C. M., Egger, M., & Salanti, G. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.17066025
Chiocchia, V., Nikolakopoulou, A., Higgins, J. P. T., Page, M. J., Papakonstantinou, T., Cipriani, A., Furukawa, T. A., Siontis, G. C. M., Egger, M., & Salanti, G. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.17066028
Chiocchia, V., Nikolakopoulou, A., Higgins, J. P. T., Page, M. J., Papakonstantinou, T., Cipriani, A., Furukawa, T. A., Siontis, G. C. M., Egger, M., & Salanti, G. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.17066019
Chiocchia, V., Nikolakopoulou, A., Higgins, J. P. T., Page, M. J., Papakonstantinou, T., Cipriani, A., Furukawa, T. A., Siontis, G., Egger, M., & Salanti, G. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.17066007
Chiocchia, V., Nikolakopoulou, A., Higgins, J. P. T., Page, M. J., Papakonstantinou, T., Cipriani, A., Furukawa, T. A., Siontis, G., Egger, M., & Salanti, G. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.17066016
Chiocchia, V., Nikolakopoulou, A., Higgins, J. P. T., Page, M. J., Papakonstantinou, T., Cipriani, A., Furukawa, T. A., Siontis, G., Egger, M., & Salanti, G. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.17066013
Chiocchia, V., Nikolakopoulou, A., Higgins, J. P. T., Page, M. J., Papakonstantinou, T., Cipriani, A., Furukawa, T. A., Siontis, G., Egger, M., & Salanti, G. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.17066010
Chiocchia, V., Nikolakopoulou, A., Higgins, J. P. T., Page, M. J., Papakonstantinou, T., Cipriani, A., Furukawa, T. A., Siontis, G. C. M., Egger, M., & Salanti, G. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.17066022
A meta-scientific approach to understanding stress regulation
Sparacio, A. (2023) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/757862f2z87a4z4ec7zabc9z5a275e01261b
Kansızoğlu, H. B., Kansızoğlu, N., & Memiş, M. (2026) · Journal of Computer and Education Research · doi:10.18009/jcer.1701299
He, X., Xue, J., & Xiong, H. (2026) · Virtual Reality · doi:10.1007/s10055-025-01268-0 · Cited by 1
Psychology’s RenaissancePreprint
Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2022) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)
Alsalti, T., Hussey, I., Elson, M., Krause, R. W., & Pohl, S. (2026) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/ejn.70533
Moving in the presence of others – a systematic review and meta-analysis on social facilitationPreprint
Strauß, B., Greve, J., & van Meurs, E. (2021) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)
Scientific consensus communication about contested science: A preregistered meta-analysisPreprint
Riet, J. V. ‘., Veling, H., Riet, J. V. '., Schaap, G., & Buijzen, M. (2026) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)
The relationship between problem-solving appraisal and internalizing disorders: a meta-analysis
Pretorius, T. B., & Padmanabhanunni, A. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1824501
The Linguistics of Analysing Deception in Written Texts
Picornell, I. (2026) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009671125
Fujia, Y., & See, B. H. (2026) · Review of Education · doi:10.1002/rev3.70189 · Cited by 1
An ecological meta-analysis of coach education for sport-based youth development
Li, L., Tereschenko, I., & McCleery, J. (2026) · International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching · doi:10.1177/17479541261461871
The Relationship Between Anger and Nonsuicidal Self‐Injury: A Meta‐Analysis
Halverson, T. F., Patel, T. A., Nguyen, L., Zelkowitz, R. L., Goodrich, M., Kimbrel, N. A., Kaplan, S., & Dillon, K. H. (2026) · Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior · doi:10.1111/sltb.70123
Sun, S., Rajasankar, V., Giovannone, N., Miguel, C., Harrer, M., van Straten, A., Cuijpers, P. J., Loucks, E. B., & Goldberg, S. (2026) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113883
Fostering creativity through interdisciplinary teaching: A meta-analysis of effectiveness
Chi, S., Zhang, X., Jia, L., & Wang, Z. (2026) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2026.102379
Guidelines for Meta‐Analytic Structural Equation Modeling: Steps, Resources, and Illustrations
Waheed, H., & Lim, W. M. (2026) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.70266
Estimation and inference for step-function selection models in meta-analyses with dependent effects
Pustejovsky, J. E., Citkowicz, M., & Joshi, M. (2026) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1017/rsm.2026.10117
A meta-scientific approach to understanding stress regulation
Sparacio, A. (2023) · Cronfa (Swansea University) · doi:10.23889/suthesis.63454
Chen, M. (2026) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-026-03206-7
Sala, G., & Gobet, F. (2019) · Collabra: Psychology · doi:10.2478/collabra.2019.5.1.18
Metadata
- Authors
- McShane, B. B., Böckenholt, U., & Hansen, K. T.
- Affiliations
- Northwestern University (US)
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Corresponding author
- McShane, Blakeley B.
- Venue
- Perspectives on Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2016-09
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 730-749
- ISSN
- 1745-6916 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-6924
- OpenAlex
- W2524737933
- Cited by
- 398
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 30 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 29.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Perspectives on Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Keywords
- publication bias, selection methods, p-curve, meta-analysis, sensitivity analysis, effect size estimation, simulation study
- MeSH terms
- Computer Simulation, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Humans, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Models, Statistical, Publication Bias
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
