Social rewards: From basic social building blocks to complex social behavior
Abstract
Humans are social creatures, engaging almost constantly in social behaviors that serve ultimate social goals, such as forming strong bonds with one another. However, most social behaviors provide only incremental progress toward an ultimate goal. Instead, the drive to engage in any individual social act may derive from its proximal value rather than its ultimate goal. Thus, this proximal value forms the foundation on which the complexities of human sociality are built. We describe two complementary approaches for using proximal social rewards to understand social behaviors and their ultimate goals: (a) decontextualizing social rewards-paring down complex social interactions can help identify which basic building blocks remain valuable even in minimalistic contexts-and (b) recontextualizing social rewards-reintroducing motivational and contextual factors into the study of social experience can help identify how proximal rewards serve their ultimate function. We discuss how this dual-approach framework can inform future research by bridging basic social building blocks and real-world social goals.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Positive valence cues from others activate approach motivation, including anticipation of valued social outcomes.
“Positive valence cues from others (e.g., signs of affiliation such as smiling or social initiation) activate approach motivation, including anticipation of valued social outcomes.(8)”
This study is the first to demonstrate psychosocial treatment enhancement of the striatum during social reward processing in people with anxiety or depression.
“To our knowledge, this study is the first to demonstrate psychosocial treatment enhancement of the striatum during social reward processing in people with anxiety or depression – suggesting engagement of a mechanism supporting our drive to connect with others.(8)”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 218 · Cited by 109
- Authors
- Tamir, D. I., & Hughes, B. L.
- Affiliations
- Princeton University (US)
- University of California, Riverside (US)
- Corresponding author
- Tamir, Diana I.
- Venue
- Perspectives on Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2018-11
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 700-717
- ISSN
- 1745-6916 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-6924
- OpenAlex
- W2901641367
- Cited by
- 109
- References
- 218
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 21.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Perspectives on Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Keywords
- social reward, ultimate goals, social behavior, social bonding, decontextualization, recontextualization, motivation, social experience
- MeSH terms
- Cognition, Cues, Goals, Group Processes, Motivation, Reward, Self Concept, Self Disclosure, Social Behavior, Social Values
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review