The DOI matches its Crossref record; 132 of the 132 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Smartphones and Close Relationships: The Case for an Evolutionary Mismatch
Abstract
This article introduces and outlines the case for an evolutionary mismatch between smartphones and the social behaviors that help form and maintain close social relationships. As psychological adaptations that enhance human survival and inclusive fitness, self-disclosure and responsiveness evolved in the context of small kin networks to facilitate social bonds, promote trust, and enhance cooperation. These adaptations are central to the development of attachment bonds, and attachment theory is a middle-level evolutionary theory that provides a robust account of the ways human bonding provides for reproductive and inclusive fitness. Evolutionary mismatches operate when modern contexts cue ancestral adaptations in a manner that does not provide for their adaptive benefits. We argue that smartphones and their affordances, although highly beneficial in many circumstances, cue humans’ evolved needs for self-disclosure and responsiveness across broad virtual networks and, in turn, have the potential to undermine immediate interpersonal interactions. We review emerging evidence on the topic of technoference, which is defined as the ways in which smartphone use may interfere with or intrude into everyday social interactions. The article concludes with an empirical agenda for advancing the integrative study of smartphones, intimacy processes, and close relationships.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“According to the interference hypothesis [24,25], the frequency of phone use is critical for understanding the effects of smartphones on well-being (Table 1).”
From The effects of smartphones on well-being: theoretical integration and research agenda (2020) · cites this paper as [25]
In the citing paper
“According to the interference hypothesis [24,25], the frequency of phone use is critical for understanding the effects of smartphones on well-being (Table 1).”
From The effects of smartphones on well-being: theoretical integration and research agenda (2020) · cites this paper as [25]
Citations
Cites
The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation.
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.117.3.497 · Cited by 23,245
(1978) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 12,570
Attachment and Loss. Vol. 1. Attachment
Rever, G. W. (1972) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00006842-197211000-00011 · Cited by 8,446
Social Relationships and Mortality Risk: A Meta-analytic Review
Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T. B., & Layton, J. B. (2010) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000316 · Cited by 7,272
The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition
Tomasello, M. (2009) · doi:10.2307/j.ctvjsf4jc · Cited by 6,368
Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process.
Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.511 · Cited by 6,247
Loneliness and Social Isolation as Risk Factors for Mortality: A Meta-Analytic Review
Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T. B., Baker, M., Harris, T., & Stephenson, D. (2015) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691614568352 · Cited by 6,043
Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness.
Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596 · Cited by 5,157
Motivational, emotional, and behavioral correlates of fear of missing out
Przybylski, A. K., Murayama, K., DeHaan, C. R., & Gladwell, V. (2013) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.014 · Cited by 3,932
Handbook of attachment: theory, research, and clinical applications
(2009) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.46-4135 · Cited by 3,819
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- Bailenson J., 2018, Experience on demand: How virtual reality is, how it works, and what it can do
- 10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497 · DOI · Paper page
- Brenner S. L., 2015, Journal of Evolutionary Medicine, 30, 32
- Derlega V. J., 1993, Self-disclosure
- Emler N., 1994, Good gossip, 117
- Gardner W. L., 2005, The social outcast: Ostracism, social exclusion, rejection, and bullying, 227
- Hazan C., 2004, Adult attachment: New directions and emerging issues, 55
- Kelley H. H., 1983, Close relationships, 20
- Reis H. T., 1988, Handbook of personal relationships, 367
- Tamir D. I., 2015, The psychology of desire, 432
- Turkle S., 2011, Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from ourselves
- Twenge J., 2017, Igen: The 10 trends shaping today’s young people—and the nation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Meier, A., & Reinecke, L. (2021) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650220958224 · Cited by 534
“Several reviews provide crucial syntheses of such mechanisms (e.g., Bayer et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2019; Sbarra et al., 2019).”
BackgroundLoneliness across time and space
Luhmann, M., Buecker, S., & Rüsberg, M. (2022) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-022-00124-1 · Cited by 197
Effectiveness of Multimedia Pedagogical Agents Predicted by Diverse Theories: a Meta-Analysis
Castro-Alonso, J. C., Wong, R. M., Adesope, O., & PAAS, F. G. W. C. (2021) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-020-09587-1 · Cited by 173
The effects of smartphones on well-being: theoretical integration and research agenda
Kushlev, K., & Leitao, M. R. (2020) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.05.001 · Cited by 129
Braune‐Krickau, K., Schneebeli, L., Pehlke‐Milde, J., Gemperle, M., Koch, R., & von Wyl, A. (2021) · Infant Mental Health Journal · doi:10.1002/imhj.21908 · Cited by 124
Metadata
- Authors
- Sbarra, D. A., Briskin, J. L., & Slatcher, R. B.
- Affiliations
- University of Arizona (US)
- Wayne State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Sbarra, David A.
- Venue
- Perspectives on Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2019-04-19
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 596-618
- ISSN
- 1745-6916 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-6924
- OpenAlex
- W2902638667
- Semantic Scholar
- f02a1245ac9c7b9b4e17fb55933afa073ac1fcea
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 132
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 2.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Perspectives on Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) (acceptedVersion)
- OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Keywords
- smartphones, close relationships, evolutionary mismatch, technoference, self-disclosure, responsiveness, attachment theory, intimacy, social interaction, inclusive fitness, family networks, social networking sites
- MeSH terms
- Smartphone, Biological Evolution, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Object Attachment, Social Behavior, Trust
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review