Cited by 392Indigenous Health, Education, and RightsDecolonial Thought and EpistemologiesQualitative Research Methods and Ethics

Decolonizing both researcher and research and its effectiveness in Indigenous research

Open access
Datta, Ranjan·2018·Research Ethics

Abstract

How does one decolonize and reclaim the meanings of research and researcher, particularly in the context of Western research? Indigenous communities have long experienced oppression by Western researchers. Is it possible to build a collaborative research knowledge that is culturally appropriate, respectful, honoring, and careful of the Indigenous community? What are the challenges in Western research, researchers, and Western university methodology research training? How have ‘studies’ – critical anti-racist theory and practice, cross-cultural research methodology, critical perspectives on environmental justice, and land-based education – been incorporated into the university to disallow dissent? What can be done against this disallowance? According to Eve Tuck and K Wayne Yang’s (2012) suggestion, this article did not use the concept of decolonization as a substitute for ‘human rights’ or ‘social justice’, but as a demand of an Indigenous framework and a centering of Indigenous land, Indigenous sovereignty and Indigenous ways of thinking. This article discusses why both research and researcher increasingly require decolonization so that research can create a positive impact on the participants’ community, and conduct research ethically. This article is my personal decolonization and reclaiming story from 15 years of teaching, research and service activities with various Indigenous communities in various parts of the world. It presents a number of case studies of an intervention research project to exemplify the challenges in Western research training, and how decolonizing research training attempts to not only reclaim participants’ rights in the research but also to empower the researcher. I conclude by arguing that decolonizing research training creates more empathetic educators and researchers, transforming us for participants, and demonstrating how we can take responsibility for our research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1747016117733296

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Participant observation used in ethnography grew out of a colonial history of objectifying and othering Indigenous peoples.

    “For example, the method of participant observation used in ethnography grew out of a colonial history of objectifying and othering Indigenous peoples (Asch, 2001; Campbell & Lassiter, 2014; Datta, 2018).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Datta, R.
Affiliations
University of Saskatchewan (CA)
Corresponding author
Datta, Ranjan
Venue
Research Ethics
Published
2017-09-28
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
1-24
ISSN
  • 1747-0161 (ISSN-L)
  • 2047-6094
OpenAlex
W2757021329
Cited by
392
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 94 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 10 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
8.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Research Ethics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Decolonial Thought and Epistemologies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Keywords
decolonial research, Indigenous research, researcher empowerment, Indigenous sovereignty, cross-cultural research methodology, environmental justice, land-based learning, research collaboration, indigenous peoples

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review