Cited by 180Stroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryCardiac Health and Mental HealthCancer survivorship and care

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 99 of the 99 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Frequency of anxiety after stroke: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

Open access

Abstract

Background: Anxiety is a common and distressing problem after stroke. Aims: To undertake an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies of anxiety after stroke and integrate the findings with those reported previously. Summary of review: Multiple databases were searched in May 2018 and 53 new studies were included following dual independent sifting and data extraction. These were combined with 44 previous studies to form a combined data set of 97 studies, comprising 22,262 participants. Studies using interview methods were of higher quality. Rates of anxiety by interview were 18.7% (95% confidence interval 12.5, 24.9%) and 24.2% (95% confidence interval 21.5, 26.9%) by rating scale. Rates of anxiety did not lower meaningfully up to 24 months after stroke. Eight different anxiety subtypes were also reported. Conclusions: This review confirms that anxiety occurs in around one in four patients (by rating scale) and one in five patients (by interview). More research on anxiety subtypes is needed for an informed understanding of its effects and the development of interventions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1747493019896958

Cites

99 of 99 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 99 references

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Review Manager (RevMan) [Computer program]. Version 5.3. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014.
  2. Ibrahimagic OC, 2005, Med Arh, 59, 366
  3. Li SB, 2006, Chin J Clin Rehabil, 10, 186
  4. Masskulpan P, 2008, J Med Assoc Thai, 91, 1595
  5. Watanabe H, 1984, IRYO Jpn J Natl Med Serv, 38, 1101
  6. Zhao R, 1999, Chin J Clin Psychol, 7, 230
  7. Ajiboye PO, 2013, Afr Health Sci, 13, 624
  8. Azanmasso H, 2017, Cerebrovasc Dis, 43, 100
  9. Beghi M, 2009, Rivista di Psichiatria, 44, 55
  10. Bovim M, 2016, Int J Stroke, 11, 235
  11. Chanchaem R, 2013, Cerebrovasc Dis, 36, 40
  12. Chinchaladze L, 2013, Int J Psychiat Clin Pract, 17, 17
  13. Crowley D, 2018, Aging Mental Health, 10, 1
  14. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.020078 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Delva M, 2017, Georgian Med News, 11, 59
  16. Garikimukku S, 2015, Ind J Psychiat, 57, S48
  17. Ibrahimagic OC, 2013, Cerebrovasc Dis, 35, 701
  18. Mulroy M, 2012, Stroke, 43, A89
  19. Petrova EA, 2012, Klininka Nervnykh I Psikhicheskikh Zabolevanii, 9, 12
  20. Ponchel A, 2016, Stroke Res Treat, 2410921
  21. Solgajova A, 2017, Neuroendocrinol Lett, 38
  22. Verma G, 2012, Ind J Psychiat, 54, S45
  23. Vuletic V, 2011, Acta Clinica Croatica, 50, 344
  24. Vuletić V, 2012, Acta Clinica Croatica, 51, 243
  25. Wu S, 2017, Int J Clin Exp Med, 10, 6994
  26. Zalihic A, 2010, Psychiatria Danubia, 22, 241
  27. American Psychiatric Association, 2016, Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 (SCID-5)
  28. Sheehan DV, 1998, J Clin Psychiatry, 59, 22
  29. Wright F, 2017, Stroke Res Treat, 2124743

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 180

Metadata

Authors
Knapp, P., Dunn-Roberts, A., Sahib, N., Cook, L., Astin, F., Kontou, E., & Thomas, S. A.
Affiliations
  • University of York (GB)
  • Hull York Medical School (GB)
  • University of Huddersfield (GB)
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
Corresponding author
Knapp, Peter
Venue
International Journal of Stroke
Published
2020-01-24
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
244-255
ISSN
  • 1747-4930 (ISSN-L)
  • 1747-4949
OpenAlex
W4214948227
Cited by
180
References
99
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 7
FWCI
2.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • International Journal of Stroke (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Huddersfield Research Portal (University of Huddersfield) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR-INF-2005)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
anxiety, stroke, anxiety prevalence, anxiety subtypes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review