Putting wrongs to right: Campaigns against miscarriages of justice
Abstract
Campaigns against miscarriages of justice have played a role not just in exposing individual cases of injustice but also in helping to shape criminal justice policy itself. The means by which such campaigns manage to achieve degrees of ‘success’ are therefore of criminological significance. Using the term ‘miscarriages of justice’ to embrace both ‘wrongful convictions’ and the failure of agencies to act appropriately (‘not doing enough’), the article proceeds to define the various ways in which such campaigns might be said to have ‘successful’ outcomes. Using documentary analysis and a programme of interviews with key players, the article then examines the ‘critical success factors’ behind campaigns against miscarriages of justice. It concludes that two factors have been the key to successful campaigns against miscarriages of justice: on the one hand the ability of campaigns to access the social resources and social capital associated with campaigning networks; on the other hand the ability of victims and families associated with injustices to provide the resilience and cohesion which campaigns typically need to achieve goals.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Without an apology, the wrongfully convicted person's spoiled identity is reinforced, causing secondary victimisation and enduring relational harm.
“Without an apology, their 'spoiled identity' is reinforced, causing secondary victimisation and enduring relational harm (Savage et al., 2007).”
From The Zemiological Afterlife of Wrongful Conviction: Spoiled Identity, Repair and Survivorship (2024) · cites this paper as Savage et al., 2007
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 42 · Cited by 28
- Authors
- Savage, S. P., Grieve, J., & Poyser, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Portsmouth (GB)
- Canterbury Christ Church University (GB)
- ORCID
- Poyser, Sam
- Venue
- Criminology & Criminal Justice
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2007-02
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 83-105
- ISSN
- 1748-8958 (ISSN-L)
- 1748-8966
- OpenAlex
- W2117870981
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 8.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Criminology & Criminal Justice (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Law and Policy
- Keywords
- miscarriage of justice, wrongful convictions, campaign success factors, social capital, victims and families, criminal justice policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review