Cited by 28Criminal Justice and PenologyCriminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisCriminal Law and Policy

Putting wrongs to right: Campaigns against miscarriages of justice

Savage, Stephen P., Grieve, John, Poyser, Sam·2007·Criminology & Criminal Justice

Abstract

Campaigns against miscarriages of justice have played a role not just in exposing individual cases of injustice but also in helping to shape criminal justice policy itself. The means by which such campaigns manage to achieve degrees of ‘success’ are therefore of criminological significance. Using the term ‘miscarriages of justice’ to embrace both ‘wrongful convictions’ and the failure of agencies to act appropriately (‘not doing enough’), the article proceeds to define the various ways in which such campaigns might be said to have ‘successful’ outcomes. Using documentary analysis and a programme of interviews with key players, the article then examines the ‘critical success factors’ behind campaigns against miscarriages of justice. It concludes that two factors have been the key to successful campaigns against miscarriages of justice: on the one hand the ability of campaigns to access the social resources and social capital associated with campaigning networks; on the other hand the ability of victims and families associated with injustices to provide the resilience and cohesion which campaigns typically need to achieve goals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1748895807072477

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 42 · Cited by 28

Authors
Savage, S. P., Grieve, J., & Poyser, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Portsmouth (GB)
  • Canterbury Christ Church University (GB)
Venue
Criminology & Criminal Justice
Published
2007-02
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
83-105
ISSN
  • 1748-8958 (ISSN-L)
  • 1748-8966
OpenAlex
W2117870981
Cited by
28
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
8.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Criminology & Criminal Justice (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Law and Policy
Keywords
miscarriage of justice, wrongful convictions, campaign success factors, social capital, victims and families, criminal justice policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review