Higher, Faster, Louder: Representations of the International Music Competition
Abstract
Competitions have been a visible and controversial part of the classical music world for over a century, yet sociologists have strangely neglected to study their social significance.This article explores the competition's ongoing contest for legitimacy by considering the case of the Van Cliburn International Piano Competition.Through a discourse analysis of publicity materials and media coverage, I reconstruct the symbolic frameworks that guide the construction of the event and the interpretation of competitors' performances. I also trace the critical challenge to the idealized representations of the event, and decode the gender ideologies implied in commonly used metaphors. Demonstrating the centrality of meaning in musical production and reception, I aim to expose the limitations of the production perspective and Bourdieu's model of the artistic field, offering in their place a new approach based on social performance.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A newly emerging emphasis on performativity draws on theoretical developments in American cultural sociology, where actors are conceived as conveying meaning through communicative acts, such as competitions.
“A newly emerging emphasis on performativity, for instance, draws on theoretical developments in American cultural sociology, where actors are conceived as conveying meaning through communicative acts, such as competitions (McCormick 2009).”
From Bourdieu and the Sociology of Music Consumption: A Critical Assessment of Recent Developments (2013) · cites this paper as McCormick 2009
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bourdieu and the Sociology of Music Consumption: A Critical Assessment of Recent Developments
Prior, N. (2013) · Sociology Compass · doi:10.1111/soc4.12020 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
- Authors
- McCormick, L.
- Affiliations
- Haverford College (US)
- Corresponding author
- McCormick, Lisa
- ORCID
- McCormick, Lisa
- Venue
- Cultural Sociology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-03
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5-30
- ISSN
- 1749-9755 (ISSN-L)
- 1749-9763
- OpenAlex
- W2122832777
- Cited by
- 54
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 50.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cultural Sociology (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Exeter
- University of Auckland
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Music › Musicology and Musical Analysis
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Music › Music History and Culture
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Cultural Dynamics
- Keywords
- music competitions, classical music, legitimacy, symbolic framework, media coverage, promotional materials, gender ideology, metaphor, social performance, musical meaning, music reception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review