The Social and the Aesthetic: For a Post-Bourdieuian Theory of Cultural Production
Abstract
This article sets out new methodological principles for the sociology of art, a sub-discipline that it seeks to broaden conceptually by shifting the ground from art to cultural production. This shift suggests the utility of overcoming the boundaries that demarcate the sociology of art from adjacent fields, augmenting the sociological repertoire with reference to anthropology, cultural and media studies, art and cultural history, and the music disciplines. At the same time the article proposes that an explanatory theory of cultural production requires reinvention in relation to five key themes: aesthetics and the cultural object; agency and subjectivity; the place of institutions; history, temporality and change; and problems of value and judgement. The first half of the article approaches these issues through a sustained critique of Bourdieu. It proceeds through an exposition of generative research from contemporary anthropology, including the work of Alfred Gell, Christopher Pinney, Fred Myers and others, which highlights the analysis of mediation, ontology, materiality and genre. The second half develops fur ther an analytics of mediation and of temporalities, exemplifying this and expanding on the five themes through a discussion of two institutional ethnographies of cultural production (of the computer music institute IRCAM in Paris, and of the BBC). In pursuing this programme the paper advocates a novel conception of the relation between theoretical model and empirical research, one that might be termed post-positivist empiricism, while also suggesting that the framework outlined offers the basis for an enriched cultural criticism.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Those who profess some sympathy for Bourdieu's concepts have often pointed to significant shortcomings in his work, finding it overly rigid or lacking a convincing account of technology and creative agency.
“Those who profess some sympathy for Bourdieu's concepts have often pointed to significant shortcomings in his work, finding it overly rigid or lacking a convincing account of technology and creative agency (Prior 2008;Born 2010).”
From Bourdieu and the Sociology of Music Consumption: A Critical Assessment of Recent Developments (2013) · cites this paper as Born 2010
The work of Georgina Born (2010) is significant in the way it registers the specific, material properties of music as it mediates and constitutes the inner lives of musicians and listeners.
“The work of Georgina Born (2010) is significant here, in the way it registers the specific, material properties of music as it mediates and constitutes the inner lives of musicians and listeners.”
From Bourdieu and the Sociology of Music Consumption: A Critical Assessment of Recent Developments (2013) · cites this paper as Born 2010
Cites
Bourdieu, P. (1990) · doi:10.1515/9781503621749 · Cited by 17,271 · see citing works
Art And Agency: An Anthropological Theory
Gell, A. (1998) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198280132.001.0001 · Cited by 3,460 · see citing works
Miller, D. (2005) · Materiality · doi:10.1215/9780822386711-001 · Cited by 521 · cited 5× · see citing works
“The first, evident in the work of Alfred Gell, Daniel Miller and Christopher Pinney, focuses on the cultural object and the forms of mediation through which it is constituted and which in turn it inaugurates. These writers vigorously contest the continuing resort in sociology and anthropology to the sterile trope of s…”
BackgroundInfluential
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Community Sense: The Cohesive Power of Aesthetic Judgment
Wohl, H. (2015) · Sociological Theory · doi:10.1177/0735275115617800 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Bourdieu and the Sociology of Music Consumption: A Critical Assessment of Recent Developments
Prior, N. (2013) · Sociology Compass · doi:10.1111/soc4.12020 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
- Authors
- Born, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Born, Georgina
- ORCID
- Born, Georgina
- Venue
- Cultural Sociology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2010-07
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 171-208
- ISSN
- 1749-9755 (ISSN-L)
- 1749-9763
- OpenAlex
- W1972540960
- Cited by
- 296
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 27.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cultural Sociology (publishedVersion)
- Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford) (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Cultural Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Anthropological Studies and Insights
- Keywords
- cultural production, sociology of art, Pierre Bourdieu, critique of Bourdieu, mediation (cultural/media theory), temporality, cultural institutions, aesthetics, generative research, Alfred Gell, materiality, genre, ontology, institutional ethnography, IRCAM, BBC, cultural criticism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review