CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 51Music History and CultureCopyright and Intellectual PropertyCultural Industries and Urban Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Do People Value Recorded Music?

Open access
Marshall, Lee·2019·Cultural Sociology
DOI 10.1177/1749975519839524
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

How much do the majority of people value music, and can or should that level of value be reflected in music’s economic value? The dramatic decline in the economic value of recorded popular music in the 21st century has prompted much debate about music being ‘devalued’ and the perceived ‘value gap’ between music’s socio-cultural and economic values. Using the economic decline of recorded music as a springboard, this article takes a different approach, however. It offers a theoretical analysis of popular music consumption practices organised thematically in terms of ‘music as object’ (focusing on the social values generated and perceived by recorded music artefacts) and ‘music as sound’ (focusing on the way that most contemporary musical experiences are characterised by music being background sound or accompaniment). Overall, the argument is that ‘music’ may not be as culturally valued by people as is commonly assumed. The way that music operates as a low-value entity to many people is perhaps reflected in the cultural and economic contours of the digital music industry, though they are not caused by digitisation per se.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1749975519839524

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Citations

Cites

Show all 30 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. BPI, 1991, BPI Yearbook
  2. BPI, 2014, BPI Yearbook
  3. Buxmann P, 2007, Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 8, 32
  4. Carnworth J, 2014, Understanding the Value and Impact of Cultural Experiences: A Literature Review
  5. Fritz B, 2018, The Big Picture: The Fight for the Future of Movies
  6. IFPI, 1999, The Recording Industry in Numbers
  7. IFPI, 2016, Global Music Report
  8. Kot G, 2009, Ripped: How the Wired Generation Revolutionised Music
  9. Sprigman C (2006) The 99-cent question. Journal on Telecommunications and High Technology Law 5(1): 87–125. SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 952019. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=952019 (accessed 3 April 2019).
  10. Sutcliffe P, 1989, Q Magazine, 1989, 70
  11. Throsby D, 2006, Capturing the Public Value of Heritage: The Proceedings of the London Conference 25–26 January 2006, 40

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Marshall, L.
Affiliations
University of Bristol (GB)
Corresponding author
Marshall, Lee
ORCID
Marshall, Lee
Venue
Cultural Sociology
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2019-05-13
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
141-158
ISSN
  • 1749-9755 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-9763
DOI
10.1177/1749975519839524
OpenAlex
W2944560607
Semantic Scholar
357589f57a6b4d80934f5dda1b7354b8955ce97a
Cited by
51
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6
FWCI
64.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Cultural Sociology (publishedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Music › Music History and Culture
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Copyright and Intellectual Property
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Cultural Industries and Urban Development
Keywords
music recordings, music consumption, value gap, accompaniment, digital music industry, popular music

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-03 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review