The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interdiscursivity in professional communication
Abstract
In recent versions of professional genre analysis, context has assumed increasingly critical importance, thus redefining genre as a configuration of text-internal and text-external factors. The emphasis on text-external properties of genre has brought into focus the notion of interdiscursivity as distinct from intertextuality, which is primarily viewed as appropriation of text-internal resources. Drawing evidence from a number of professional contexts, this article explores the nature, function, and use of interdiscursivity in genre theory, defining interdiscursivity as a function of appropriation of generic resources across discursive, professional and cultural practices, which, it is claimed, is central to our understanding of the complexities of genres that are typically employed in professional, disciplinary, and institutional communication.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life.
Naegele, K. D., & Goffman, E. (1956) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2089106 · Cited by 25,991
Foucault, M. (1970) · Social Science Information · doi:10.1177/053901847000900108 · Cited by 10,859
Speech Genres and Other Late Essays
Bakhtin, M. M. (1986) · University of Texas Press eBooks · doi:10.7560/720466 · Cited by 8,470
Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings
Pufahl, I., & Swales, J. M. (1993) · Language · doi:10.2307/416471 · Cited by 5,111
Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings
James, M. O., & Swales, J. M. (1992) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/329786 · Cited by 4,694
Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, the
(2008) · Encyclopedia of Political Communication · doi:10.4135/9781412953993.n530 · Cited by 3,771
Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language
Chng, H. H. (1996) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/0378-2166(96)89194-6 · Cited by 3,613
Miller, C. R. (1984) · Quarterly Journal of Speech · doi:10.1080/00335638409383686 · Cited by 2,907
Fairclough, N. (2013) · doi:10.4324/9781315834368 · Cited by 1,954
Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings
Drury, H. (1995) · English for Specific Purposes · doi:10.1016/0889-4906(95)90021-7 · Cited by 1,528
Metadata
- Authors
- Bhatia, V. K.
- Venue
- Discourse & Communication
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2010-02
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 32-50
- ISSN
- 1750-4813 (ISSN-L)
- 1750-4821
- OpenAlex
- W1981652857
- Cited by
- 349
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 288.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interdiscursivity in professional communication. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1750481309351208
- The paper
- Bhatia, V. K. (2010). Interdiscursivity in professional communication. Discourse & Communication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481309351208
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.