Weakened links between mind and body in older age: the case for maturational dualism in the experience of emotion
Open accessAbstract
As neuroscience methods begin to dominate emotion research it is critical for researchers to remember that peripheral embodiments are critical to understanding emotional experience and emotion—behavior links. Much of modern emotion research assumes reliable mind—body connections that suggest that changes in emotional states influence bodily responses and, vice versa, that somatovisceral information shapes emotional experiences. However, there may be important qualifications to the link between the mind and the (peripheral) body. For example, the ability to sense internal and external bodily states declines in older age as does activation of physiological systems, all of which may contribute to an impairment in emotional experiences and how emotions influence behavior. I describe this phenomenon as maturational dualism and suggest implications of this for emotion in older adults.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Late adulthood stressors are important in that people have lower homeostatic capacity, physiological resilience, as well as less coupling between their internal and external stimuli.
“Late adulthood stressors are also important in that people have lower homeostatic capacity, physiological resilience, as well as less coupling between their internal and external stimuli (Mendes, 2010 described in Section 6.3).”
From More than a feeling: A unified view of stress measurement for population science (2018) · cites this paper as Mendes, 2010
Maturational dualism suggests that bodily changes that co-occur with aging can influence the experience of affective states.
“Evidence of declines in sensory perception of the body as we age, and how this decline can interrupt the mind-body connection, has been used as evidence of maturational dualism, a phenomenon that suggests that the bodily changes that co-occur with the aging process can influence the experience of affective states (Mendes, 2010).”
From More than a feeling: A unified view of stress measurement for population science (2018) · cites this paper as Mendes, 2010
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 30 · Cited by 70
- Authors
- Mendes, W. B.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Mendes, Wendy Berry
- ORCID
- Mendes, Wendy Berry
- Venue
- Emotion Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2010-05-17
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 240-244
- ISSN
- 1754-0739 (ISSN-L)
- 1754-0747
- OpenAlex
- W2034941230
- Cited by
- 70
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 2.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- nrs.harvard.edu
- Locations
- Emotion Review (publishedVersion)
- Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
- Keywords
- emotional experience, older adults, mind-body problem, aging, physiological decline
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review