Mindfulness and De-Automatization
Abstract
Some maladaptive thought processes are characterized by reflexive and habitual patterns of cognitive and emotional reactivity. We review theoretical and empirical work suggesting that mindfulness—a state of nonjudgmental awareness of the present moment—can facilitate the discontinuation of such automatic mental operations. We propose a framework that suggests a series of more specific mechanisms supporting the de-automatizing function of mindfulness. Four related but distinct elements of mindfulness (awareness, attention, focus on the present, and acceptance) can each contribute to de-automatization through subsequent processes, including discontinuing automatic inference, enhancing cognitive control capacity, facilitating metacognitive insight, and preventing suppression or thought distortion. De-automatizing can, in turn, allow enhancement of adaptive self-control ability and increased well-being.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Mindfulness training can improve the management of attentional resources.
“Mindfulness training can improve the management of attentional resources (Kang et al., 2013).”
From Being able to think when caught in the maelstrom - how adolescents used mindfulness when facing exams. (2024) · cites this paper as Kang et al., 2013
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 76 · Cited by 286
- Authors
- Kang, Y., Gruber, J., & Gray, J. R.
- Affiliations
- Yale University (US)
- Venue
- Emotion Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2012-11-07
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 192-201
- ISSN
- 1754-0739 (ISSN-L)
- 1754-0747
- OpenAlex
- W2117392127
- Cited by
- 286
- References
- 76
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 9.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Emotion Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Mind wandering and attention
- Keywords
- mindfulness, de-automatization, cognitive reactivity, emotional reactivity, cognitive control, thought suppression, self-control, well-being, acceptance, attention
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review