Cited by 144Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlDiabetes Management and ResearchHyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients

The Accuracy of Point-of-Care Glucose Measurements

Open access
Rebel, Annette, Rice, Mark A., Fahy, Brenda G.·2012·Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology

Abstract

Control of blood glucose (BG) in an acceptable range is a major therapy target for diabetes patients in both the hospital and outpatient environments. This review focuses on the state of point-of-care (POC) glucose monitoring and the accuracy of the measurement devices. The accuracy of the POC glucose monitor depends on device methodology and other factors, including sample source and collection and patient characteristics. Patient parameters capable of influencing measurements include variations in pH, blood oxygen, hematocrit, changes in microcirculation, and vasopressor therapy. These elements alone or when combined can significantly impact BG measurement accuracy with POC glucose monitoring devices (POCGMDs). In general, currently available POCGMDs exhibit the greatest accuracy within the range of physiological glucose levels but become less reliable at the lower and higher ranges of BG levels. This issue raises serious safety concerns and the importance of understanding the limitations of POCGMDs. This review will discuss potential interferences and shortcomings of the current POCGMDs and stress when these may impact the reliability of POCGMDs for clinical decision-making.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/193229681200600228

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 84 · Cited by 144

Authors
Rebel, A., Rice, M. A., & Fahy, B. G.
Affiliations
  • University of Kentucky (US)
  • University of Florida Health (US)
Corresponding author
Fahy, Brenda G.
Venue
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
Published
2012-03
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
396-411
ISSN
1932-2968 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2102260836
Cited by
144
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 4
FWCI
1.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
Keywords
point-of-care glucose monitoring, blood glucose measurement accuracy, diabetes management, measurement interference, hematocrit, blood oxygen, pH, microcirculation, vasopressor therapy, clinical decision-making
MeSH terms
Blood Glucose, Calibration, Diabetes Mellitus, Equipment Design, Humans, Predictive Value of Tests, Reference Values, Risk Factors, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring, Reproducibility of Results, Biomarkers, Point-of-Care Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review