The Accuracy of Point-of-Care Glucose Measurements
Open accessAbstract
Control of blood glucose (BG) in an acceptable range is a major therapy target for diabetes patients in both the hospital and outpatient environments. This review focuses on the state of point-of-care (POC) glucose monitoring and the accuracy of the measurement devices. The accuracy of the POC glucose monitor depends on device methodology and other factors, including sample source and collection and patient characteristics. Patient parameters capable of influencing measurements include variations in pH, blood oxygen, hematocrit, changes in microcirculation, and vasopressor therapy. These elements alone or when combined can significantly impact BG measurement accuracy with POC glucose monitoring devices (POCGMDs). In general, currently available POCGMDs exhibit the greatest accuracy within the range of physiological glucose levels but become less reliable at the lower and higher ranges of BG levels. This issue raises serious safety concerns and the importance of understanding the limitations of POCGMDs. This review will discuss potential interferences and shortcomings of the current POCGMDs and stress when these may impact the reliability of POCGMDs for clinical decision-making.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Blood sampling at capillary level results in higher glucose concentration than in venous blood and is affected by the metabolic state.
“Blood sampling at capillary level results in higher glucose concentration than in venous blood and is affected by the metabolic state 91.”
From Glucose biosensors in clinical practice: principles, limits and perspectives of currently used devices (2022) · cites this paper as [91]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 84 · Cited by 144
- Authors
- Rebel, A., Rice, M. A., & Fahy, B. G.
- Affiliations
- University of Kentucky (US)
- University of Florida Health (US)
- Corresponding author
- Fahy, Brenda G.
- ORCID
- Fahy, Brenda G.
- Venue
- Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2012-03
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 396-411
- ISSN
- 1932-2968 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3380786
- OpenAlex
- W2102260836
- Cited by
- 144
- References
- 84
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 4
- FWCI
- 1.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
- Keywords
- point-of-care glucose monitoring, blood glucose measurement accuracy, diabetes management, measurement interference, hematocrit, blood oxygen, pH, microcirculation, vasopressor therapy, clinical decision-making
- MeSH terms
- Blood Glucose, Calibration, Diabetes Mellitus, Equipment Design, Humans, Predictive Value of Tests, Reference Values, Risk Factors, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring, Reproducibility of Results, Biomarkers, Point-of-Care Systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review