Cited by 15Healthcare cost, quality, practicesPatient Safety and Medication ErrorsHealthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization

Inpatient insulin pen implementation, waste, and potential cost savings: a community hospital experience

Open access
Najmi, Urooj, Haque, Waqas Zia, Ansari, Umair, Yemane, Eyerusalem, Alexander, Lee Ann, Lee, Christina, Demidowich, Andrew P., Motevalli, Mahsa +6 more·2021·Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology

Abstract

Background Insulin pen injectors ("pens") are intended to facilitate a patient's self-administration of insulin and can be used in hospitalized patients as a learning opportunity. Unnecessary or duplicate dispensation of insulin pens is associated with increased healthcare costs. Methods Inpatient dispensation of insulin pens in a 240-bed community hospital between July 2018 and July 2019 was analyzed. We calculated the percentage of insulin pens unnecessarily dispensed for patients who had the same type of insulin pen assigned. The estimated cost of insulin pen waste was calculated. A pharmacist-led task force group implemented hospital-wide awareness and collaborated with hospital leadership to define goals and interventions. Results 9516 insulin pens were dispensed to 3121 patients. Of the pens dispensed, 6451 (68%) were insulin aspart and 3065 (32%) were glargine. Among patients on insulin aspart, an average of 2.2 aspart pens was dispensed per patient, but only an estimated 1.2 pens/patient were deemed necessary. Similarly, for inpatients prescribed glargine, an average of 2.1 pens/patient was dispensed, but only 1.3 pens/patient were necessary. A number of gaps were identified and interventions were undertaken to reduce insulin pen waste, which resulted in a significant decrease in both aspart (p = 0.0002) and glargine (p = 0.0005) pens/patient over time. Reductions in pen waste resulted in an estimated cost savings of $66 261 per year. Conclusions In a community hospit…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/19322968211002514

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several reports indicate that inpatient use of insulin pens is safe and may improve nurse satisfaction when safety protocols, including nursing education and bar code scanning procedures, are in place to guarantee single-person use.

    “Several reports indicate that inpatient use of insulin pens is safe and may improve nurse satisfaction when safety protocols, including nursing education and bar code scanning procedures, are in place to guarantee single-person use (70-73).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Najmi, U., Haque, W. Z., Ansari, U., Yemane, E., Alexander, L. A., Lee, C., Demidowich, A. P., Motevalli, M., Mackay, P., Tucker, C., Notobartolo, C., Sartippour, P., Raynor, J., & Zilbermint, M.
Affiliations
  • American International School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Suburban Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Zilbermint, Mihail
Venue
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
Published
2021-04-12
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
741-747
ISSN
1932-2968 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3154864544
Cited by
15
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare cost, quality, practices
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
Keywords
insulin aspart, glargine, hospital pharmacy intervention, employee training, cost reduction, diabetes self-management education, community hospitals
MeSH terms
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Hospitals, Community, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Inpatients, Insulin, Insulin Infusion Systems, Cost Savings

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review