Cited by 11Diabetes Management and ResearchIntravenous Infusion Technology and SafetyPatient Safety and Medication Errors

Air Bubbles in Insulin Pumps: A Clinically Relevant Issue?

Open access
Heinemann, Lutz·2022·Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/19322968221101885

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heinemann, L.
Affiliations
Science Consulting in Diabetes GmbH, Kaarst, Germany
Corresponding author
Heinemann, Lutz
Venue
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
Published
2022-06-04
Volume
16
Issue
6
Pages
1351-1355
ISSN
1932-2968 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4281711617
Cited by
11
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Intravenous Infusion Technology and Safety
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
Keywords
air bubbles, insulin pump, insulin delivery, subcutaneous insulin infusion, diabetes management
MeSH terms
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Insulin Infusion Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review