Cited by 41Endometriosis Research and TreatmentProtease and Inhibitor MechanismsReproductive Biology and Fertility

Increased Circulating MMP-2 Levels in Infertile Patients With Moderate and Severe Pelvic Endometriosis

Malvezzi, Helena, Aguiar, Valéria Gomes, Paz, Claudia Cristina Paro de, Tanus-Santos, José Eduardo, Penna, Ivan Andrade de Araujo, Navarro, Paula Andrea·2013·Reproductive Sciences

Abstract

The current study compares the levels of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2 and MMP-9 in the follicular fluid (FF) of infertile patients with and without endometriosis submitted to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization and the levels of MMP-2 in the serum of the same patients. We also evaluated whether the severity of endometriosis can influence serum and/or FF concentration of these metalloproteinases. A cross-sectional study was conducted on 30 patients: stage I/II endometriosis (n = 10), stage III/IV endometriosis (n = 10), and control (infertility due to tubal and/or male factor; n = 10). Blood samples for the analysis of MMP-2 levels were obtained during the early follicular phase of the menstrual cycle. The FF samples for the analysis of MMP-2 and MMP-9 were obtained on the day of oocyte retrieval. The concentrations of MMP-2 and MMP-9 were determined by zymography. No intragroup or intergroup difference was observed in MMP-2 or MMP-9 levels in FF. Significantly higher MMP-2 levels were detected in the serum of infertile women with stage III/IV endometriosis compared to women with stage I/II endometriosis. In conclusion, no differences were observed in the follicular levels of MMP-2 and MMP-9 between infertile patients with and without endometriosis. However, the levels of MMP-2 were significantly higher in the serum of infertile women with advanced stages of endometriosis. Taken together, the present results demonstrate that advanced pelvic endometriosis severity is related to higher serum MMP-2 levels but does not influence follicular MMP-2 or MMP-9 levels in periovulatory follicles obtained from stimulated cycles.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1933719112459234

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 30 · Cited by 41

Authors
Malvezzi, H., Aguiar, V. G., Paz, C. C. P. D., Tanus-Santos, J. E., Penna, I. A. D. A., & Navarro, P. A.
Affiliations
Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
Venue
Reproductive Sciences
Published
2013-05
Volume
20
Issue
5
Pages
557-562
ISSN
  • 1933-7191 (ISSN-L)
  • 1933-7205
OpenAlex
W2071660112
Cited by
41
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2013: 2
FWCI
2.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Reproductive Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Protease and Inhibitor Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
Keywords
MMP-2, MMP-9, pelvic endometriosis, female infertility, endometriosis severity, follicular fluid, serum biomarkers, ovulation induction, in vitro fertilization, periovulatory follicle
MeSH terms
Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Infertility, Female, Menstrual Cycle, Ovulation Induction, Severity of Illness Index, Biomarkers, Follicular Fluid, Up-Regulation, Case-Control Studies, Matrix Metalloproteinase 2, Matrix Metalloproteinase 9, Oocyte Retrieval

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review