Cited by 279Healthcare Facilities Design and SustainabilityFacilities and Workplace ManagementEducational Environments and Student Outcomes

A Conceptual Framework for the Domain of Evidence-Based Design

Open access
Ulrich, Roger S., Berry, Leonard L., Quan, Xiaobo, Parish, Janet Turner·2010·HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal

Abstract

The physical facilities in which healthcare services are performed play an important role in the healing process. Evidence-based design in healthcare is a developing field of study that holds great promise for benefiting key stakeholders: patients, families, physicians, and nurses, as well as other healthcare staff and organizations. In this paper, the authors present and discuss a conceptual framework intended to capture the current domain of evidence-based design in healthcare. In this framework, the built environment is represented by nine design variable categories: audio environment, visual environment, safety enhancement, wayfinding system, sustainability, patient room, family support spaces, staff support spaces, and physician support spaces. Furthermore, a series of matrices is presented that indicates knowledge gaps concerning the relationship between specific healthcare facility design variable categories and participant and organizational outcomes. From this analysis, the authors identify fertile research opportunities from the perspectives of key stakeholders.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/193758671000400107

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 85 · Cited by 279

Authors
Ulrich, R. S., Berry, L. L., Quan, X., & Parish, J. T.
Affiliations
Texas A&M University (US)
Corresponding author
Berry, Leonard L.
Venue
HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal
Published
2010-10
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
95-114
ISSN
  • 1937-5867 (ISSN-L)
  • 2167-5112
OpenAlex
W2022988184
Cited by
279
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
FWCI
21.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • HERD Health Environments Research & Design Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
  • Chalmers Publication Library (Chalmers University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Chalmers Research (Chalmers University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Healthcare Facilities Design and Sustainability
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Facilities and Workplace Management
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
Keywords
evidence-based design, healthcare facility design, built environment, design variables, visual environment, wayfinding, hospital room design, sustainability, safety improvement, knowledge gaps, stakeholder outcomes
MeSH terms
Audiovisual Aids, Environment Design, Hospital Design and Construction, Humans, Job Satisfaction, Patients' Rooms, Social Support, Treatment Outcome, Safety Management, Evidence-Based Practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review