A Conceptual Framework for the Domain of Evidence-Based Design
Open accessAbstract
The physical facilities in which healthcare services are performed play an important role in the healing process. Evidence-based design in healthcare is a developing field of study that holds great promise for benefiting key stakeholders: patients, families, physicians, and nurses, as well as other healthcare staff and organizations. In this paper, the authors present and discuss a conceptual framework intended to capture the current domain of evidence-based design in healthcare. In this framework, the built environment is represented by nine design variable categories: audio environment, visual environment, safety enhancement, wayfinding system, sustainability, patient room, family support spaces, staff support spaces, and physician support spaces. Furthermore, a series of matrices is presented that indicates knowledge gaps concerning the relationship between specific healthcare facility design variable categories and participant and organizational outcomes. From this analysis, the authors identify fertile research opportunities from the perspectives of key stakeholders.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Conceptual frameworks such as Ulrich et al.'s address the systematic approach to research design critical for collecting homogenous data.
“Additionally, conceptual frameworks such as those presented by Ulrich et al. address the much-needed systematic approach to research design critical for collecting homogenous data [133].”
From SAFEvR MentalVeRse.app: Development of a Free Immersive Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy for Acrophobia and Claustrophobia (2024) · cites this paper as [133]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 85 · Cited by 279
- Authors
- Ulrich, R. S., Berry, L. L., Quan, X., & Parish, J. T.
- Affiliations
- Texas A&M University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Berry, Leonard L.
- Venue
- HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2010-10
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 95-114
- ISSN
- 1937-5867 (ISSN-L)
- 2167-5112
- OpenAlex
- W2022988184
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 85
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 21.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- papers.ssrn.com
- Locations
- HERD Health Environments Research & Design Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
- Chalmers Publication Library (Chalmers University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Chalmers Research (Chalmers University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Healthcare Facilities Design and Sustainability
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Facilities and Workplace Management
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
- Keywords
- evidence-based design, healthcare facility design, built environment, design variables, visual environment, wayfinding, hospital room design, sustainability, safety improvement, knowledge gaps, stakeholder outcomes
- MeSH terms
- Audiovisual Aids, Environment Design, Hospital Design and Construction, Humans, Job Satisfaction, Patients' Rooms, Social Support, Treatment Outcome, Safety Management, Evidence-Based Practice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review