Clinic Exam Room Design: Present and Future
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This article aims to deconstruct various design qualities and strategies of clinic exam rooms, and discuss how they influence users' interaction and behavior in the space. Relevant literature supports the advantages and disadvantages of different design strategies. Annotated exam room prototypes illustrate the design qualities and strategies discussed. BACKGROUND: Advancements in technology and medicine, along with new legislative policies, are influencing the way care providers deliver care and ultimately clinic exam room designs. The patient-centered medical home model has encouraged primary care providers to make patients more active leaders of their health plan which will influence the overall functionality and configuration of clinic exam rooms. Specific design qualities discussed include overall size, location of doors and privacy curtains, positioning of exam tables, influence of technology in the consultation area, types of seating, and placement of sink and hand sanitizing dispensers. In addition, future trends of exam room prototypes are presented. CONCLUSIONS: There is a general lack of published evidence to support design professionals' design solutions for outpatient exam rooms. Future research should investigate such topics as the location of exam tables and privacy curtains as they relate to patient privacy; typical size and location of consultation table as it relates to patient connection and communication; and placement of sinks and sanitization dispensers as they relate to frequency and patterns of usage.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Examination table design can significantly impact clinicians' ability to collect detailed information comprehensively and accurately.
“In addition, the design of the examination table can significantly impact clinicians’ ability to collect detailed information with greater comprehensiveness and accuracy.”
From Toward Safer Diagnoses: A SEIPS-Based Narrative Review of Diagnostic Errors (2026) · cites this paper as [312]
The position of exam tables can significantly influence evaluation completeness and result accuracy.
“If assessment and procedural requirements are considered, the position of exam tables can significantly influence evaluation completeness and result accuracy [312].”
From Toward Safer Diagnoses: A SEIPS-Based Narrative Review of Diagnostic Errors (2026) · cites this paper as [312]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 18 · Cited by 16
- Authors
- Freihoefer, K., Nyberg, G., & Vickery, C.
- Corresponding author
- Freihoefer, Kara
- Venue
- HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2013-04
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 138-156
- ISSN
- 1937-5867 (ISSN-L)
- 2167-5112
- OpenAlex
- W2047177573
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 6 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 11.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- HERD Health Environments Research & Design Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Healthcare Facilities Design and Sustainability
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Facilities and Workplace Management
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
- Keywords
- patient-centered medical home, patient privacy, sink placement, seat design, patient-provider interaction
- MeSH terms
- Ambulatory Care Facilities, Communication, Humans, Privacy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review