Cited by 29Urban Green Space and HealthHealthcare Facilities Design and SustainabilityFacilities and Workplace Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Accessing Green Spaces Within a Healthcare Setting: A Mixed Studies Review of Barriers and Facilitators

Open access
Weerasuriya, Rona, Henderson-Wilson, Claire, Townsend, Mardie·2019·HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal

Abstract

This review describes the facilitators and barriers impacting on passive access to green spaces within healthcare settings. A systematic mixed-studies review was undertaken to review the quantitative and qualitative evidence on access to green spaces within healthcare settings, as well as to review the methodological quality of the studies eligible for inclusion. A total of 24 articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. The barriers to access were grouped into three themes: “awareness,” “accessibility,” and “comfort.” The facilitators were grouped into 13 themes: “flora and foliage,” “views,” “water features,” “sun, rain, fresh air, wind,” “animal life,” “diverse textures, heights, shapes,” “lawn,” “natural versus artificial material,” “rest areas,” “shade,” “private areas,” “play equipment,” and “safety.” These findings can be explained through multiple lenses, using existing theories on contact with nature and supportive garden design. In an era of elevated stress, patient admissions, and staff turnover in hospitals, and rising costs of providing healthcare services, the creation of settings conducive to health promotion, stress reduction, and faster recovery is relevant and timely. This article, which has collated over three decades of research evidence, is invaluable in addressing this issue.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1937586718810859

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Asano F., 2009, Landscape Research Japan, 72, 928
  2. 10.1634/theoncologist.2008-7001 · DOI
  3. Connellan K., 2011, Paper presented at the IASDR Diversity and Unity, the 4th World Conference on Design Research
  4. Cooper Marcus C., 1999, Healing gardens: Therapeutic benefits and design recommendations
  5. 10.1177/193758671100400303 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1177/1533317507309799 · DOI
  7. Djurup R. (2010). Chapter 1: How Google ranks search results your guide to Google web search: How to find the information you need on the internet (pp. 29–30). Gentofte, Denmark: Rebidu ApS.
  8. 10.1300/J081v21n01_07 · DOI
  9. 10.1080/01426397.2011.641948 · DOI
  10. Jaques S., 1995, Good Housekeeping, 220, 24
  11. Jiang S., 2013, Frontiers of Architectural Research
  12. Lehrer J., 2009, Scientists report
  13. 10.1017/S0714980800001732 · DOI
  14. 10.1177/153331759701200603 · DOI
  15. Mitrione S., 2008, Minnesota medicine, 91, 31
  16. 10.1016/S0840-4704(10)61202-1 · DOI
  17. 10.1177/193758670800200112 · DOI
  18. Nardo F. D., 2010, Italian Journal of Public Health, 7, 402, 10.2427/5699 · DOI
  19. 10.3928/0098-9134-20030501-04 · DOI
  20. 10.1177/193758671300600405 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.05.005 · DOI
  22. 10.1177/193758670800100204 · DOI
  23. 10.4236/jep.2011.25073 · DOI
  24. Saffarinia M., 2012, International Journal of Environmental Research, 6, 689
  25. Said I., 2006, Garden as restorative environment for children in Malaysia hospital setting
  26. 10.3130/jaabe.4.331 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.11.013 · DOI
  28. Turner J., 2009, Pediatric Nursing, 35, 27
  29. 10.1126/science.6143402 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1006/jevp.2001.0224 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Weerasuriya, R., Henderson-Wilson, C., & Townsend, M.
Affiliations
  • Deakin University (AU)
  • Faculty of Health, Health Nature and Sustainability Research Group, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia
Corresponding author
Weerasuriya, Rona
Venue
HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal
Published
2018-11-27
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
119-140
ISSN
  • 1937-5867 (ISSN-L)
  • 2167-5112
OpenAlex
W2902174718
Cited by
29
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • HERD Health Environments Research & Design Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
McGill University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban Green Space and Health
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Architecture › Healthcare Facilities Design and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Architecture › Facilities and Workplace Management
Keywords
green spaces, healthcare settings, hospital gardens, nature contact, barriers and facilitators, garden design, patient recovery, stress reduction, health promotion, accessibility (transport and spatial geography), playground equipment
MeSH terms
Gardens, Architectural Accessibility, Facility Design and Construction, Health Facilities, Humans, Patient Satisfaction, Nature, Patient Safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review