Cited by 10Urban Green Space and HealthHealthcare Facilities Design and SustainabilityStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery

Nature-Based Design in Stroke Rehabilitation Environments: A Scoping Review

Open access
Seale, Belinda, Davis, Aaron, Lawson, Justin, Smith, Louisa, Watson, Joanne, Henderson-Wilson, Claire·2024·HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal

Abstract

Objective: To identify, examine, and map the characteristics of knowledge of nature-based design in stroke rehabilitation facilities, examine how research in this field has been conducted and identify gaps in knowledge. Background: Many stroke survivors have wide ranging impacts, resulting in long hospital stays to undertake rehabilitation. The physical environment can influence brain recovery; however, there is limited evidence to support the design of effective rehabilitation environments. Conversely, the health benefits available from connection with nature are well established. A nature-based design approach may have benefits and implications for the physical environment of inpatient stroke rehabilitation facilities; however, it is unclear what evidence exists in this field. Method: This scoping review followed the JBI methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews, with systematic searches of six databases. Results: Twenty-eight studies were included in the review. Aims and research methods varied widely. Investigations in 19 studies related to gardens and other designed outdoor nature-based environments. Other studies explored natural analogues, nature inside, inside/outside connections, and the natural environment. Findings from the studies were spread across the fields of design, use, exposure to, and engagement in nature-based environments. Conclusion: The characteristics of knowledge underpinning nature-based design in stroke rehabilitation environments are highly diverse, and significant gaps exist in the evidence base. A framework developed during this review for mapping knowledge on the intentions and impacts for spaces and services in this field assisted to identify these gaps and may be applied to other areas of healthcare design research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/19375867241251832

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Seale, B., Davis, A., Lawson, J., Smith, L., Watson, J., & Henderson-Wilson, C.
Affiliations
  • Deakin University (AU)
  • University of South Australia (AU)
  • Health Nature & Sustainability Research Group, School of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia
Corresponding author
Seale, Belinda
Venue
HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal
Published
2024-05-14
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
186-211
ISSN
  • 1937-5867 (ISSN-L)
  • 2167-5112
OpenAlex
W4396893686
Cited by
10
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • HERD Health Environments Research & Design Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UniSA Research Outputs Repository (University of South Australia) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Urban Green Space and Health
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Healthcare Facilities Design and Sustainability
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Keywords
nature-based design, stroke rehabilitation, healthcare environment design, gardens, natural analogues, indoor-outdoor connection, nature exposure, stroke survivors, inpatient rehabilitation facilities, knowledge gaps
MeSH terms
Stroke Rehabilitation, Gardens, Environment Design, Facility Design and Construction, Humans, Rehabilitation Centers, Nature

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review