Cited by 73Primate Behavior and EcologyWildlife Conservation and Criminology AnalysesWildlife Ecology and Conservation

Monkeys in a West African Bushmeat Market: Implications for Cercopithecid Conservation in Eastern Liberia

Open access
Covey, Ryan, McGraw, W. Scott·2014·Tropical Conservation Science

Abstract

According to the IUCN [ 1 ], four of the nine anthropoid species found in Liberia are classified as either Vulnerable or Endangered and this number is likely to rise in coming years due to an increase in bushmeat hunting and a growing human population. Bushmeat hunting is the primary cause of primate loss in West Africa and current estimated offtake rates combined with habitat loss have placed four taxa endemic to Upper Guinea forests in danger of extirpation. We surveyed one bushmeat market located on the Liberia – Ivory Coast border to assess the general impact of hunting in one area of Liberia. This market, located near the Ivorian town of Taï, receives meat daily from the Konobo District of eastern Liberia. We visited the market eight times over a four month period in 2009/2010, during which we counted 723 animals including 264 primates. According to our surveys of the market, Cercopithecus petaurista (Lesser spot-nosed monkey) [25% of all primates] was the most abundant primate, followed by Cercopithecus diana (Diana monkey) [19.3%], Cercocebus atys (Sooty mangabey) [12.1%], Colobus polykomos (King colobus) [11.4%], Procolobus verus (Olive colobus) [10.6%], Cercopithecus campbelli (Campbelli monkey) [10.2%], and Procolobus badius (Western red colobus) [9.5%]. We estimate an average of thirty-three primates were exchanged each day we visited and that a minimum of 9,500 primates are traded annually at this locale (6,900 during formal market days and 2,600 on non-market day…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/194008291400700103

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 19 · Cited by 73

Authors
Covey, R., & McGraw, W. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Oregon (US)
  • The Ohio State University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Covey, Ryan
  • McGraw, W. Scott
Venue
Tropical Conservation Science
Published
2014-03
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
115-125
ISSN
1940-0829 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2240059873
Cited by
73
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4
FWCI
3.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Tropical Conservation Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Keywords
bushmeat trade, primate hunting, Old World monkeys, primate conservation, hunting pressure, extinction risk, Upper Guinea Forest, Cercopithecus diana, Cercocebus atys, Colobus polykomos, Cercopithecus campbelli, Liberia, TAI

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review