Monkeys in a West African Bushmeat Market: Implications for Cercopithecid Conservation in Eastern Liberia
Open accessAbstract
According to the IUCN [ 1 ], four of the nine anthropoid species found in Liberia are classified as either Vulnerable or Endangered and this number is likely to rise in coming years due to an increase in bushmeat hunting and a growing human population. Bushmeat hunting is the primary cause of primate loss in West Africa and current estimated offtake rates combined with habitat loss have placed four taxa endemic to Upper Guinea forests in danger of extirpation. We surveyed one bushmeat market located on the Liberia – Ivory Coast border to assess the general impact of hunting in one area of Liberia. This market, located near the Ivorian town of Taï, receives meat daily from the Konobo District of eastern Liberia. We visited the market eight times over a four month period in 2009/2010, during which we counted 723 animals including 264 primates. According to our surveys of the market, Cercopithecus petaurista (Lesser spot-nosed monkey) [25% of all primates] was the most abundant primate, followed by Cercopithecus diana (Diana monkey) [19.3%], Cercocebus atys (Sooty mangabey) [12.1%], Colobus polykomos (King colobus) [11.4%], Procolobus verus (Olive colobus) [10.6%], Cercopithecus campbelli (Campbelli monkey) [10.2%], and Procolobus badius (Western red colobus) [9.5%]. We estimate an average of thirty-three primates were exchanged each day we visited and that a minimum of 9,500 primates are traded annually at this locale (6,900 during formal market days and 2,600 on non-market day…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Hunting is considered the primary cause of primate loss in West Africa.
“It is considered the primary cause of primate loss in West Africa (Covey & McGraw, ).”
From Commercial hunting to supply urban markets threatens mammalian biodiversity in Sapo National Park, Liberia (2016) · cites this paper as Covey & McGraw, 2014
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 19 · Cited by 73
- Authors
- Covey, R., & McGraw, W. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Oregon (US)
- The Ohio State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Covey, Ryan
- McGraw, W. Scott
- ORCID
- McGraw, W. Scott
- Venue
- Tropical Conservation Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2014-03
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 115-125
- ISSN
- 1940-0829 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2240059873
- Cited by
- 73
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4
- FWCI
- 3.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Tropical Conservation Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Keywords
- bushmeat trade, primate hunting, Old World monkeys, primate conservation, hunting pressure, extinction risk, Upper Guinea Forest, Cercopithecus diana, Cercocebus atys, Colobus polykomos, Cercopithecus campbelli, Liberia, TAI
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review