Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 41Space exploration and regulationGlobal Energy and Sustainability ResearchGlobal Energy Security and Policy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Lunar Helium-3 Fuel for Nuclear Fusion: Technology, Economics, and Resources

Simko, Thomas, Gray, Matthew·2014·World Futures Review

Abstract

Nuclear fusion of helium-3 ( 3 He) can be used to generate electrical power with little or no radioactive waste and no carbon emissions. Some forty-four tons of this fuel could meet the electricity needs of the United States for a year. Although rare on Earth, an estimated one million tons of 3 He has collected on the surface of the moon. While it would cost approximately US$17 billion to develop a mine producing one ton of 3 He per year, such an operation is commercially viable over the medium term given the estimated value of that ton of fuel: US$3.7 billion. This article outlines the technical and economic issues related to 3 He and its extraction, and it presents a novel approach to estimating the worth of the fuel. The potential of 3 He as a future energy source is set in the context of global energy forecasts and international efforts to investigate lunar 3 He resources—including a recent Chinese mission.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1946756714536142

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. CEDIGAZ, 2010, Natural Gas in the World
  2. Kulcinski G. L., Ashley R. P., Santarius J. F., Piefer G., Subramanian K. M. 2000. “Development of Lunar 3 He resources: Near-Term Applications and Long-Term Prospects.” Paper presented at the 4th International Conference on the Exploration and Utilisation of the Moon, July 10–15, Noordwijk, The Netherlands. http://fti.neep.wisc.edu/pdf/fdm1128.pdf
  3. Kulcinski G. L., Schmitt H. H. 2000. “Nuclear Power without Radioactive Waste—The Promise of Lunar Helium-3.” Paper presented at the 2nd Annual Lunar Development Conference on Return to the Moon II, July 20–21, Las Vegas, NV. http://fti.neep.wisc.edu/pdf/fdm1131.pdf
  4. Lafleur C. 2010. “Spacecraft Stats and Insights.” The Space Review, April 5. http://www.thespacereview.com/article/1598/1
  5. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 1998. “Lunar Prospector Science Data Return: A Summary of Results from the Set of Papers Printed in the September 4, 1998 Edition of Science.” Vol. 281, Press Kit. Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration. lunar.arc.nasa.gov/New Results/LP_Sci_Data.pdf
  6. Sviatoslavsky I. N., 1993, Paper presented at Space 94, the 4th International Conference and Exposition on Engineering, Construction and Operations in Space, and the Conference and Exposition/Demonstration on Robotics for Challenging Environments
  7. White S. W., 1998, Net Energy Payback and CO2 Emissions from Helium-3 Fusion and Wind Electrical Power Plants

Cited by

See all 41

Metadata

Authors
Simko, T., & Gray, M.
Affiliations
  • Australian Energy Advancements Pty Ltd., Deakin, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
  • Australian National University (AU)
Venue
World Futures Review
Published
2014-06
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
158-171
ISSN
  • 1946-7567 (ISSN-L)
  • 2169-2793
OpenAlex
W2059246562
Cited by
41
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 3
FWCI
0.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • World Futures Review (publishedVersion)
  • RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
University of Toronto
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Space exploration and regulation
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Global Energy and Sustainability Research
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › General Energy › Global Energy Security and Policy
Keywords
helium-3, lunar helium-3, nuclear fusion, fusion energy, lunar mining, commercial viability, lunar resources, energy futures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review