Cited by 45Social and Intergroup PsychologyRacial and Ethnic Identity ResearchHigher Education Research Studies

A Diversity Ideology Intervention: Multiculturalism Reduces the Racial Achievement Gap

Birnbaum, Hannah J., Stephens, Nicole M., Townsend, Sarah S. M., Hamedani, MarYam G.·2021·Social Psychological and Personality Science

Abstract

In the United States, underrepresented racial minority (URM) students continue to face psychological barriers that undermine their achievement and fuel disparities in academic outcomes. In the current research, we tested whether a multicultural ideology intervention could improve URM students’ grade point averages (GPAs) during the first 2 years of college and thereby reduce the racial achievement gap. Specifically, first-year college students ( N = 407) read a diversity statement that represented the schools’ diversity ideology in terms of either multiculturalism or colorblindness. URM students who read a multicultural diversity statement earned higher GPAs 2 years later compared to those who read a colorblind diversity statement. Furthermore, they earned higher GPAs compared to a nonparticipant campus-wide control group. The current study is the first to demonstrate that multiculturalism can increase the long-term academic outcomes of URM students in college.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1948550620938227

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Underrepresented minority first-year college students who read an inclusive multicultural diversity statement earned higher marks 2 years later compared to those who read a color-blind diversity statement.

    “In a college setting, another study showed that underrepresented minority first-year students who read an inclusive multicultural diversity statement earned higher marks 2 years later compared to those who read a color-blind diversity statement (Birnbaum, Stephens, Townsend, & Hamedani, 2020).”

    From Tackling Educational Inequalities with Social Psychology: Identities, Contexts, and Interventions (2021) · cites this paper as Birnbaum, Stephens, Townsend, & Hamedani, 2020

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Birnbaum, H. J., Stephens, N. M., Townsend, S. S. M., & Hamedani, M. G.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • Management and Organizations Department, Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Birnbaum, Hannah J.
Venue
Social Psychological and Personality Science
Published
2020-07-23
Volume
12
Issue
5
Pages
751-759
ISSN
  • 1948-5506 (ISSN-L)
  • 1948-5514
OpenAlex
W3045278817
Cited by
45
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1
FWCI
7.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Social Psychological and Personality Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
Keywords
multiculturalism, colorblind ideology, racial achievement gap, first-year college students, grade point average, academic performance, racial inequality in education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review