Cited by 3Diversity and Career in MedicineHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutInnovations in Medical Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Why residents quit: Prevalence of and reasons for attrition among anaesthesia residents in a single sponsoring institution

Open access
Moo, Daphne, Siow, Wei Shyan, Ong, Ee Teng·2020·Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare

Abstract

Background: The SingHealth Anaesthesiology Residency Programme (SHARP) is a 5-year postgraduate training programme in Singapore. Since its inauguration in 2011, SHARP has taken in the largest number of anaesthesia residents in Singapore. However, we noticed significant attrition over the years. As attrition is a costly and disruptive affair, both to the individual and the programme, we seek to investigate the prevalence of and reasons for separation, in order to determine ways to minimize attrition. Methods: An online anonymous survey was conducted among all residents who have separated from SHARP. The questionnaire comprised questions regarding demographic data, reasons behind separation, obstacles faced during residency, and potential ways to reduce attrition. Results: From 2011 to 2018, 22 out of 127 residents have separated from the programme, giving an overall attrition prevalence of 17%. Nineteen (86%) of the separated residents responded to our questionnaire. The most common reason for separation was due to difficulties in juggling childcare and training commitments. Of the residents who have separated, more than half of them would consider rejoining the programme if a less than full time (LTFT) option was available. Conclusion: One out of every six residents in the SHARP quits residency training. The reasons behind separation are often varied due to each resident’s unique social circumstances. An individualized training programme with a LTFT option that allows for fle…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2010105820908296

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. 10.4103/ija.IJA_543_18 · DOI
  2. 10.29060/TAPS.2019-4-1/OA2005 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Avery DM, 2017, Clin Surg, 2, 1720
  4. 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.11.005 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Avery DM, 2018, Jacobs J Surg, 5, 031
  6. 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4086 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.5811/westjem.2018.11.40449 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Association of American Medical Colleges. More women than men enrolled in U.S. medical schools in 2017. Available at: https://www.aamc.org/news-insights/press-releases/more-women-men-enrolled-us-medical-schools-2017 (2017, accessed 23 July 2019).
  9. Voinescu B, 2009, Act Med Acad, 38, 11
  10. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.7875 · DOI
  11. 10.1111/anae.13122 · DOI
  12. 10.1111/anae.13096 · DOI
  13. 10.1097/00001888-200405000-00015 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.05.014 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.11.005 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 3

Metadata

Authors
Moo, D., Siow, W. S., & Ong, E. T.
Affiliations
Changi General Hospital (SG)
Corresponding author
Moo, Daphne
Venue
Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare
Published
2020-02-20
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
94-103
ISSN
  • 2010-1058 (ISSN-L)
  • 2059-2329
OpenAlex
W3007076358
Cited by
3
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
Keywords
resident attrition, graduate medical education, resident retention, part-time training

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Why residents quit: Prevalence of and reasons for attrition among anaesthesia residents in a single sponsoring institution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/2010105820908296
The paper
Moo, D., Siow, W. S., & Ong, E. T. (2020). Why residents quit: Prevalence of and reasons for attrition among anaesthesia residents in a single sponsoring institution. Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare. https://doi.org/10.1177/2010105820908296