Cited by 22Social Skills and EducationTeam Dynamics and PerformanceSocial Work Education and Practice

The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.

Critical social thinking: A conceptual model and insights for training

Open access
Grossman, Rebecca, Thayer, Amanda L., Shuffler, Marissa L., Burke, C. Shawn, Salas, Eduardo·2015·Organizational Psychology Review

Abstract

As technology, globalization, changing work demands, and a growing reliance on teams are changing the work environment, the social complexity surrounding work functions is increasing dramatically. While a variety of socially relevant knowledge, skills, and abilities (KSAs) have been examined, we argue that studying them in isolation is no longer sufficient, as individuals require a repertoire of KSAs that must be utilized in combination to be effective in complex social situations. Thus, we propose the construct critical social thinking (CST), a holistic, integrated approach to understanding the processes that enable individuals to function in such settings, and the KSAs that are necessary for each process. Because the significance of the CST construct is closely tied to the growing need for it in practice, we also integrate disparate training findings and link them to components of our conceptual model, enabling us to put forth initial insights regarding the approaches through which CST can be trained effectively.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2041386614535423

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • By basing the current model on a process model of individual behavior in complex social situations, we highlight the dependent nature of the dimensions, implying a loose sequential relationship in which success in a later stage is dependent on the outcomes of an earlier stage.

    “By basing the current model on a process model of individual behavior in complex social situations (Grossman et al., 2015), we highlight the dependent nature of the dimensions, implying a loose sequential relationship in which success in a later stage is dependent on the outcomes of an earlier stage.”
  • This process model breaks individual behavior in a complex social situation down into four stages (scan, appraise, interpret, and interact) and the cognitive and behavioral skills that support them.

    “This process model breaks individual behavior in a complex social situation down into four stages (scan, appraise, interpret, and interact) and the cognitive and behavioral skills that support them.”

Citations

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 74 · Cited by 22

Research works printed but not linked: 70

  1. 10.21236/ADA475798 · DOI
  2. 10.1037/0022-3514.77.4.726 · DOI
  3. 10.1080/00049530601148371 · DOI
  4. Bedwell W. L., 2013, Academy of Management Learning & Education
  5. 10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.296 · DOI
  6. Bentz V. J., 1987, Explorations of scope and scale: The critical determinant of high-level effectiveness
  7. 10.1108/13527590510617774 · DOI
  8. Bourdieu P., 1985, Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education, 241
  9. 10.2307/258353 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2010.01288.x · DOI
  11. 10.1177/10983007030050010101 · DOI
  12. Cohen M. S., 2000, Paper presented at the ARI Workshop: Training Critical Skills for Battle Command
  13. Cohen M. S., 1997, Decision making under stress: Emerging themes and applications, 161
  14. Cohen M. S., 1996, Training critical thinking skills for battlefield situation assessment: An experimental test
  15. 10.1037/10278-006 · DOI
  16. Cohen M. S., 1999, Training critical thinking for the battlefield: Volume 1: Basis in cognitive theory and research
  17. 10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.3928/0148-4834-19990101-12 · DOI
  19. 10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1207/s15327043hup1201_2 · DOI
  21. Duffy T. M., 1998, Electronic collaborators: Learner centered technologies for literacy, apprenticeship, and discourse, 51
  22. 10.1515/9780804766005 · DOI
  23. 10.1027/1016-9040.13.4.277 · DOI
  24. 10.1080/02796015.1998.12085934 · DOI
  25. 10.1518/001872095779049543 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1089/109493104322820101 · DOI
  27. Ennis R. H., 1987, Teaching thinking skills: Theory and practice, 9
  28. 10.1177/107179190200900104 · DOI
  29. 10.1177/0149206304271386 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00054-7 · DOI
  31. 10.1177/1368430205051060 · DOI
  32. Glaser B. G., 1967, The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research
  33. 10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.11.003 · DOI
  34. 10.1037/h0087662 · DOI
  35. 10.1037/1082-989X.10.4.371 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.09.004 · DOI
  37. Hilton R. M., 2009, Critical social thinking and response training (Critical START): A conceptual framework for a critical social thinking training program
  38. Hurlbert J. S., 2001, Social capital: Theory & research, 209
  39. Josephson J. R., 1996, Abductive inference: Computation, philosophy, technology, 1
  40. Kenny D. A., 1994, Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis
  41. 10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.145 · DOI
  42. King E. B., 2008, Research on managing groups and teams, 109
  43. Klein G. A., 1993, Decision making in action: Models and methods, 138
  44. Klein G. A., 1993, Decision making in action: Models and methods
  45. 10.1177/014920639402000206 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1108/13673270510582974 · DOI
  47. 10.1002/bdm.381 · DOI
  48. Mueller-Hanson R., Swartout E., Morewitz C., Keil C., McGonigle T., Martin C.…Morath R. (2007). Social awareness and leader influence: A proposed model and training intervention (Research Report 1874). Army Research Institute. Retrieved from http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADA472179 · DOI
  49. 10.1080/00140130701276640 · DOI
  50. Orasanu J., 1993, Decision making in action: Models and methods, 3
  51. 10.1080/14703290500467442 · DOI
  52. O’Sullivan O., 2000, U.S. Banker, 110, 44
  53. Overtoom C., 2000, Employability skills: An update
  54. 10.1108/09534819610107349 · DOI
  55. 10.1037/0033-2909.100.3.349 · DOI
  56. Saffo P., 2007, Harvard Business Review, 85, 122
  57. 10.1518/001872000779698196 · DOI
  58. 10.1002/9780470087923.hhs296 · DOI
  59. 10.1177/1529100612436661 · DOI · Paper page
  60. 10.2190/DUGG-P24E-52WK-6CDG · DOI · Paper page
  61. 10.1287/isre.5.4.378 · DOI
  62. Schroder H. M., 1967, Human information processing: Individuals and groups functioning in complex social situations
  63. Senge P. M., 1990, The fifth discipline
  64. Smith-Jentsch K. A., 1998, Making decisions under stress, 271
  65. 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2010.01290.x · DOI
  66. Thorndike E. L., 1920, Harper’s Magazine, 140, 227
  67. 10.1002/ejsp.163 · DOI
  68. Weisinger H., 1998, Emotional intelligence at work
  69. 10.1037/10398-000 · DOI
  70. Zsambok C. E., 1997, Naturalistic decision making, 3

Metadata

Authors
Grossman, R., Thayer, A. L., Shuffler, M. L., Burke, C. S., & Salas, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Central Florida (US)
  • Clemson University (US)
  • University of Central Florida, USA
Corresponding author
Grossman, Rebecca
Venue
Organizational Psychology Review
Published
2014-06-05
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
99-125
ISSN
  • 2041-3866 (ISSN-L)
  • 2041-3874
OpenAlex
W2332506374
Cited by
22
References
74
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 5
FWCI
8.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Organizational Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Social Skills and Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Social Work Education and Practice
Keywords
knowledge, skills and abilities, teamwork, training effectiveness, conceptual model, workplace change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review