The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.
Critical social thinking: A conceptual model and insights for training
Open accessAbstract
As technology, globalization, changing work demands, and a growing reliance on teams are changing the work environment, the social complexity surrounding work functions is increasing dramatically. While a variety of socially relevant knowledge, skills, and abilities (KSAs) have been examined, we argue that studying them in isolation is no longer sufficient, as individuals require a repertoire of KSAs that must be utilized in combination to be effective in complex social situations. Thus, we propose the construct critical social thinking (CST), a holistic, integrated approach to understanding the processes that enable individuals to function in such settings, and the KSAs that are necessary for each process. Because the significance of the CST construct is closely tied to the growing need for it in practice, we also integrate disparate training findings and link them to components of our conceptual model, enabling us to put forth initial insights regarding the approaches through which CST can be trained effectively.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
By basing the current model on a process model of individual behavior in complex social situations, we highlight the dependent nature of the dimensions, implying a loose sequential relationship in which success in a later stage is dependent on the outcomes of an earlier stage.
“By basing the current model on a process model of individual behavior in complex social situations (Grossman et al., 2015), we highlight the dependent nature of the dimensions, implying a loose sequential relationship in which success in a later stage is dependent on the outcomes of an earlier stage.”
From Assessing Intercultural Competence in Higher Education: Existing Research and Future Directions (2016) · cites this paper as Grossman et al., 2015
This process model breaks individual behavior in a complex social situation down into four stages (scan, appraise, interpret, and interact) and the cognitive and behavioral skills that support them.
“This process model breaks individual behavior in a complex social situation down into four stages (scan, appraise, interpret, and interact) and the cognitive and behavioral skills that support them.”
From Assessing Intercultural Competence in Higher Education: Existing Research and Future Directions (2016) · cites this paper as Grossman et al., 2015
Citations
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 74 · Cited by 22
Research works printed but not linked: 70
- 10.21236/ADA475798 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.77.4.726 · DOI
- 10.1080/00049530601148371 · DOI
- Bedwell W. L., 2013, Academy of Management Learning & Education
- 10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.296 · DOI
- Bentz V. J., 1987, Explorations of scope and scale: The critical determinant of high-level effectiveness
- 10.1108/13527590510617774 · DOI
- Bourdieu P., 1985, Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education, 241
- 10.2307/258353 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2010.01288.x · DOI
- 10.1177/10983007030050010101 · DOI
- Cohen M. S., 2000, Paper presented at the ARI Workshop: Training Critical Skills for Battle Command
- Cohen M. S., 1997, Decision making under stress: Emerging themes and applications, 161
- Cohen M. S., 1996, Training critical thinking skills for battlefield situation assessment: An experimental test
- 10.1037/10278-006 · DOI
- Cohen M. S., 1999, Training critical thinking for the battlefield: Volume 1: Basis in cognitive theory and research
- 10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3928/0148-4834-19990101-12 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1207/s15327043hup1201_2 · DOI
- Duffy T. M., 1998, Electronic collaborators: Learner centered technologies for literacy, apprenticeship, and discourse, 51
- 10.1515/9780804766005 · DOI
- 10.1027/1016-9040.13.4.277 · DOI
- 10.1080/02796015.1998.12085934 · DOI
- 10.1518/001872095779049543 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1089/109493104322820101 · DOI
- Ennis R. H., 1987, Teaching thinking skills: Theory and practice, 9
- 10.1177/107179190200900104 · DOI
- 10.1177/0149206304271386 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00054-7 · DOI
- 10.1177/1368430205051060 · DOI
- Glaser B. G., 1967, The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research
- 10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.11.003 · DOI
- 10.1037/h0087662 · DOI
- 10.1037/1082-989X.10.4.371 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.09.004 · DOI
- Hilton R. M., 2009, Critical social thinking and response training (Critical START): A conceptual framework for a critical social thinking training program
- Hurlbert J. S., 2001, Social capital: Theory & research, 209
- Josephson J. R., 1996, Abductive inference: Computation, philosophy, technology, 1
- Kenny D. A., 1994, Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis
- 10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.145 · DOI
- King E. B., 2008, Research on managing groups and teams, 109
- Klein G. A., 1993, Decision making in action: Models and methods, 138
- Klein G. A., 1993, Decision making in action: Models and methods
- 10.1177/014920639402000206 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1108/13673270510582974 · DOI
- 10.1002/bdm.381 · DOI
- Mueller-Hanson R., Swartout E., Morewitz C., Keil C., McGonigle T., Martin C.…Morath R. (2007). Social awareness and leader influence: A proposed model and training intervention (Research Report 1874). Army Research Institute. Retrieved from http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADA472179 · DOI
- 10.1080/00140130701276640 · DOI
- Orasanu J., 1993, Decision making in action: Models and methods, 3
- 10.1080/14703290500467442 · DOI
- O’Sullivan O., 2000, U.S. Banker, 110, 44
- Overtoom C., 2000, Employability skills: An update
- 10.1108/09534819610107349 · DOI
- 10.1037/0033-2909.100.3.349 · DOI
- Saffo P., 2007, Harvard Business Review, 85, 122
- 10.1518/001872000779698196 · DOI
- 10.1002/9780470087923.hhs296 · DOI
- 10.1177/1529100612436661 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2190/DUGG-P24E-52WK-6CDG · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1287/isre.5.4.378 · DOI
- Schroder H. M., 1967, Human information processing: Individuals and groups functioning in complex social situations
- Senge P. M., 1990, The fifth discipline
- Smith-Jentsch K. A., 1998, Making decisions under stress, 271
- 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2010.01290.x · DOI
- Thorndike E. L., 1920, Harper’s Magazine, 140, 227
- 10.1002/ejsp.163 · DOI
- Weisinger H., 1998, Emotional intelligence at work
- 10.1037/10398-000 · DOI
- Zsambok C. E., 1997, Naturalistic decision making, 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Grossman, R., Thayer, A. L., Shuffler, M. L., Burke, C. S., & Salas, E.
- Affiliations
- University of Central Florida (US)
- Clemson University (US)
- University of Central Florida, USA
- Corresponding author
- Grossman, Rebecca
- Venue
- Organizational Psychology Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2014-06-05
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 99-125
- ISSN
- 2041-3866 (ISSN-L)
- 2041-3874
- OpenAlex
- W2332506374
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 74
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 5
- FWCI
- 8.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Locations
- Organizational Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
- Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Social Skills and Education
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Social Work Education and Practice
- Keywords
- knowledge, skills and abilities, teamwork, training effectiveness, conceptual model, workplace change
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review