Cited by 29Cardiovascular and exercise physiologyCardiovascular Effects of ExerciseBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies

Workload-indexed blood pressure response to a maximum exercise test among professional indoor athletes

Bauer, Pascal, Kraushaar, Lutz, Dörr, Oliver, Nef, Holger, Hamm, Christian W, Most, Astrid·2021·European Journal of Preventive Cardiology

Abstract

Background: Exercise testing is performed regularly in professional athletes. However, the blood pressure response (BPR) to exercise is rarely investigated in this cohort, and normative upper thresholds are lacking. Recently, a workload-indexed BPR (increase in systolic blood pressure per increase in metabolic equivalent of task (SBP/MET slope)) was evaluated in a general population and was compared with mortality. We sought to evaluate the SBP/MET slope in professional athletes and compare it with performance. Design: This was a cross-sectional study. Methods: A total of 142 male professional indoor athletes (age 26 ± 5 years) were examined. Blood pressure was measured at rest and during a standardized, graded cycle ergometer test. We assessed the BPR during exercise, the workload, and the metabolic equivalent of task (MET). Athletes were divided into groups according to their SBP/MET slope quartiles (I <4.3; II 4.3–6.2; III >6.2–9; IV >9 mmHg/MET) and compared regarding systolic BP (sBP) and workload achieved. Results: Athletes in group I (n = 42) had the lowest maximum sBP (180 ± 13 mmHg) but achieved the highest relative workload (4.2 ± 1 W/kg). With increasing SBP/MET slope, the maximum sBP increased (II (n = 56): 195 ± 15 mmHg; III (n = 44): 216 ± 16 mmHg) and the workload achieved decreased (II: 3.9 ± 0.7 W/kg; III: 3.3 ± 0.5 W/kg). The differences in sBP between these groups were significant (p < 0.001). None of the athletes were assigned to group IV (>9 mmHg/MET). Conclusion: Athletes in the lowest SBP/MET slope quartile displayed the lowest maximum sBP but achieved a higher workload than athletes classified into the other SBP/MET slope groups. This simple, novel metric might help to distinguish a normal from an exaggerated BPR to exercise, to identify athletes at risk of developing hypertension.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2047487320922043

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Indexing the exercise systolic blood pressure response to a workload (METs or watt) has the ability to partially remove the influence of relative workload differences, aiding clinical interpretation in light of cardiorespiratory fitness level.

    “Indexing the exercise SBP response to a workload has the ability to partially remove the influence of relative workload differences, aiding clinical interpretation in light of cardiorespiratory fitness level.”
  • The systolic blood pressure/MET slope could have utility to distinguish pathological from normal physiological systolic blood pressure responses to exercise in athletes.

    “thereby suggesting the SBP/MET-slope could have utility to distinguish pathological from normal physiological SBP responses to exercise in athletes (61).”
  • Athletes with a low systolic blood pressure/MET slope seem to achieve a lower maximal exercise systolic blood pressure but at a higher peak workload.

    “For example, athletes with a low SBP/MET-slope seem to achieve a lower maximal exercise SBP, but at a higher peak workload”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bauer, P., Kraushaar, L., Dörr, O., Nef, H., Hamm, C. W., & Most, A.
Affiliations
  • Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg (DE)
  • Adiphea GmbH, Germany
Corresponding author
Bauer, Pascal
Venue
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
Published
2020-05-07
Volume
28
Issue
13
Pages
1487-1494
ISSN
  • 2047-4873 (ISSN-L)
  • 2047-4881
OpenAlex
W3022793227
Cited by
29
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5
FWCI
3.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Preventive Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Keywords
blood pressure response to exercise, professional athletes, training load, hypertension risk, incremental exercise test, cycle ergometer, metabolic equivalent of task

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review