Cited by 21Celiac Disease Research and ManagementAdolescent and Pediatric HealthcareEosinophilic Esophagitis

Lack of long‐term follow‐up after paediatric‐adult transition in coeliac disease is not associated with complications, ongoing symptoms or dietary adherence

Open access
Kivelä, Laura, Hekkala, Sointu, Huhtala, Heini, Kaukinen, Katri, Kurppa, Kalle·2020·United European Gastroenterology Journal

Abstract

Background Follow-up of coeliac disease is recommended to prevent complications associated with unsuccessful treatment. Objective The objective of this article is to evaluate the implementation and significance of long-term follow-up. Methods Medical data were collected from 585 and follow-up questionnaires sent to 559 current adult coeliac disease patients diagnosed in childhood. Diagnostic features and adulthood health outcomes were compared between those with and without adulthood follow-up. Results Of paediatric patients, 92% were followed up 6-24 months after diagnosis. A total of 235 adults responded to the questionnaires a median of 18 years after diagnosis, and 25% of them reported regular follow-up. They were diagnosed more recently than those without follow-up (median year 2001 vs 1995, p = 0.001), being otherwise comparable at diagnosis. Those with follow-up were less often smokers (5% vs 16%, p = 0.042) and relatives of coeliac patients (48% vs 66%, p = 0.018), and more often students (48% vs 28%, p = 0.005) and type 1 diabetics (19% vs 4%, p = 0.001). Lack of follow-up was not associated with complications, ongoing symptoms, poorer general health or dietary adherence. All completely non-adherent patients were without follow-up. Conclusions Most coeliac disease patients diagnosed in childhood were not followed up according to recommendations in adulthood. The individual effect of this on long-term treatment outcomes varied markedly.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2050640619900077

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 35 · Cited by 21

Authors
Kivelä, L., Hekkala, S., Huhtala, H., Kaukinen, K., & Kurppa, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
  • Tampere University (FI)
Corresponding author
Kivelä, Laura
Venue
United European Gastroenterology Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-03
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
157-166
ISSN
  • 2050-6406 (ISSN-L)
  • 2050-6414
OpenAlex
W3000688079
Cited by
21
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • United European Gastroenterology Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion)
  • Tampere University Institutional Repository (Tampere University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Emil Aaltosen Säätiö
  • Ella ja Georg Ehrnroothin Säätiö
  • Fondazione Ettore e Valeria Rossi
  • Compagnia di San Paolo
  • Maud Kuistilan Muistosäätiö
  • European Society for Paediatric Research
  • Emil Aaltonen Foundation
  • Competitive State Research Financing of the Expert Area of Tampere University Hospital
  • Mary and Georg Ehrnrooth Foundation
  • Maire Rossi Foundation
  • Paolo Foundation
  • Maud Kuistila Foundation
  • Foundation for Paediatric Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Celiac Disease Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Keywords
celiac disease, long-term follow-up, dietary adherence, disease complications, health status, smoking, type 1 diabetes, follow-up adherence
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aftercare, Celiac Disease, Counseling, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Patient Compliance, Surveys and Questionnaires, Time Factors, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Guideline Adherence, Diet, Gluten-Free, Young Adult, Transition to Adult Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review