CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 93Privacy, Security, and Data ProtectionDigitalization, Law, and RegulationEthics and Social Impacts of AI

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How web tracking changes user agency in the age of Big Data: The used user

Open access
Peacock, Sylvia E·2014·Big Data & Society
DOI 10.1177/2053951714564228
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Big Data enhances the possibilities for storing personal data extracted from social media and web search on an unprecedented scale. This paper draws on the political economy of information which explains why the online industry fails to self-regulate, resulting in increasingly insidious web-tracking technologies. Content analysis of historical blogs and request for comments on HTTP cookies published by the Internet Engineering Task Force illustrates how cookie technology was introduced in the mid-1990s, amid stark warnings about increased system vulnerabilities and deceptive personal data extractions. In conclusion, online users today are left with few alternatives but to enter into unconscionable contracts about the extraction of their personal data when using the Internet for private purposes.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2053951714564228

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. Acar G, Eubank C, Englehardt S, et al. (2014) The web never forgets: Persistent tracking mechanisms in the wild. Draft – July 24. Available at: https://securehomes.esat.kuleuven.be/∼gacar/sticky/the_web_never_forgets.pdf (accessed July 2014). · DOI
  2. Aiden E, 2013, Uncharted: Big Data as a Lens on Human Culture
  3. Babe RE (1983) Information industries and economic analysis: Policy-makers beware. In: OH Gandy Jr, P Espinosa and JA Ordover (eds) Proceedings from the tenth annual telecommunications policy research conference . Norwood, NJ, Annapolis, Maryland: Ablex Publishing Corp., 25–28 April 1982, pp. 123–135.
  4. Baker CE, 2002, Media, Markets, and Democracy
  5. Bamford J, 1982, The Puzzle Palace: Inside the National Security Agency, America's Most Secret Intelligence Organization
  6. Barth A (2011) HTTP state management mechanism, RFC 6265. Available at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6265.txt (accessed July 2014). · DOI · Paper page
  7. Benello CG, 1981, Jacques Ellul: Interpretive Essays, 91
  8. 10.1515/9781503621749 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1016/j.dss.2013.08.008 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.clsr.2013.07.007 · DOI
  11. Curran J, 1991, Mass Media and Society, 82
  12. 10.1038/455016a · DOI
  13. 10.4324/9780203153277 · DOI
  14. Dumas MB, 2009, Principles of Computer Networks and Communications
  15. 10.1007/978-3-642-14527-8_1 · DOI
  16. Furubotn EG, 1972, Journal of Economic Literature, 10, 1137
  17. Gandy OH, 1993, The Panoptik Sort: A Political Economy of Personal Information
  18. Gordon C, 1991, The Foucault Effect: Studies in Govermentality, 1
  19. Habermas J, 1989, The Structural Change of the Public Sphere
  20. Hedrick D (1991) The Invisible Weapon . New York: Oxford University Press.
  21. Jussawalla M, 1987, The Calculus of International Communications
  22. 10.1016/j.jpdc.2014.01.003 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.clsr.2014.09.001 · DOI
  24. Korupp SE, 2006, International Journal of Internet Science, 1, 45
  25. Korupp SE, 2006, Geringere Bildung – seltener am PC. German Institute for Economic Research in Berlin Weekly Report, 19, 288
  26. 10.1073/pnas.1320040111 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Krishnamurthy B, Malandrino D and Wills CE (2007) Measuring privacy loss and the impact of privacy protection in web browsing. In: Symposium on usable privacy and security (SOUPS) , Pittsburgh, PA, 18–20 July. Available at: http://web.cs.wpi.edu/∼cew/papers/ (accessed July 2014). · DOI
  28. Kristol DM and Montulli L (1997) HTTP state management mechanism, RFC 2109. Available at: http://rfc2109.openrfc.org/ (accessed July 2014). · DOI
  29. Kristol DM and Montulli L (2000) HTTP state management mechanism, RFC 2965. Available at: http://rfc2965.openrfc.org/ (accessed July 2014). · DOI
  30. 10.1177/0539018408092575 · DOI
  31. Lanier J, 2013, Who Owns the Future?
  32. Lu R, Zhu H, Liu X, et al. (2014) Toward efficient and privacy-preserving computing in Big Data era. IEEE Network July/August: 46–50. · DOI · Paper page
  33. Mowery K and Shacham H (2012) Pixel perfect: Fingerprinting canvas in HTML5. In: Proceedings of W2SP 2012 . San Francisco, USA: IEEE Computer Society, May 2012. Available at: http://w2spconf.com/2012/papers/w2sp12-final4.pdf (accessed November 2014).
  34. 10.1504/IJEB.2012.051116 · DOI
  35. Murray KB, 2007, Critical Policy Studies, 161, 10.59962/9780774855372-010 · DOI
  36. Numan D, 2012, International Journal of Market Research, 55, 2
  37. O’Harrow R, 2005, No Place to Hide
  38. 10.2139/ssrn.2267381 · DOI
  39. 10.1007/s10433-007-0067-z · DOI
  40. 10.1145/1284621.1284627 · DOI
  41. 10.1177/0896920513501350 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1093/oso/9780199646715.001.0001 · DOI
  43. Soltani A, Canty S, Mayo Q, et al. (2009) Flash cookies and privacy. SSRN manuscript. Published 10 August 2009. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1446862 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1446862 (accessed September 2013). · DOI
  44. Turow J, 2012, Journal of Law, 2, 479
  45. 10.1108/14636691211256304 · DOI
  46. 10.2307/4135723 · DOI
  47. Wondracek G, Holz T, Platzer C, et al. (2010) Is the Internet for porn? An insight into the adult online industry. In: 9th workshop on the economics of information security (WEIS) , USA, June 2010. Available at: https://www.cs.ucsb.edu/∼chris/research/doc/weis10_pron.pdf (accessed September 2014).
  48. Yen TF, Xie Y, Yu F, et al. (2012) Host fingerprinting and tracking on the web: privacy and security implications. Internet Society Report. In: NDSS Symposium 2012 , San Diego, USA. Available at: http://www.internetsociety.org/sites/default/files/11_3.pdf (accessed September 2014).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Peacock, S. E.
Affiliations
York University (CA)
Corresponding author
Peacock, Sylvia E
ORCID
Peacock, Sylvia E
Venue
Big Data & Society
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2014-07-01
Volume
1
Issue
2
ISSN
2053-9517 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1177/2053951714564228
OpenAlex
W2111205063
Cited by
93
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 57 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1
FWCI
10.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Big Data & Society (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Keywords
online tracking, user agency, big data, cookies, HTTP cookies, political economy of information, online self-regulation, privacy, social media data

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review