What makes Big Data, Big Data? Exploring the ontological characteristics of 26 datasets
Open accessAbstract
Big Data has been variously defined in the literature. In the main, definitions suggest that Big Data possess a suite of key traits: volume, velocity and variety (the 3Vs), but also exhaustivity, resolution, indexicality, relationality, extensionality and scalability. However, these definitions lack ontological clarity, with the term acting as an amorphous, catch-all label for a wide selection of data. In this paper, we consider the question ‘what makes Big Data, Big Data?’, applying Kitchin’s taxonomy of seven Big Data traits to 26 datasets drawn from seven domains, each of which is considered in the literature to constitute Big Data. The results demonstrate that only a handful of datasets possess all seven traits, and some do not possess either volume and/or variety. Instead, there are multiple forms of Big Data. Our analysis reveals that the key definitional boundary markers are the traits of velocity and exhaustivity. We contend that Big Data as an analytical category needs to be unpacked, with the genus of Big Data further delineated and its various species identified. It is only through such ontological work that we will gain conceptual clarity about what constitutes Big Data, formulate how best to make sense of it, and identify how it might be best used to make sense of the world.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Les données massives utilisées dans l'apprentissage machine, comme celles issues de réseaux sociaux, sont fréquemment contaminées par des biais de confirmation et de stéréotypes.
“les données massives utilisées dans l’apprentissage machine, comme celles issues de réseaux sociaux, sont fréquemment contaminées par des biais de confirmation et de stéréotypes14.”
From Gouvernance algorithmique, intelligence artificielle, enjeux, éthique : esquisse d’une analyse critique (2021) · cites this paper as [14]
Cites
The Data Revolution: Big Data, Open Data, Data Infrastructures & Their Consequences
Kitchin, R. (2014) · doi:10.4135/9781473909472 · Cited by 1,469 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Based on a review of definitions of Big Data, Kitchin (2013, 2014) contends that Big Data are qualitatively different to traditional, small data along seven axes (see Table 1).”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
On big data, artificial intelligence and smart cities
Allam, Z., & Dhunny, Z. A. (2019) · Cities · doi:10.1016/j.cities.2019.01.032 · Cited by 1,178 · see citing works
Debating big data: a literature review on realizing value from big data
Günther, W. A., Rezazade Mehrizi, M. H., Huysman, M., & Feldberg, F. (2017) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2017.07.003 · Cited by 880 · see citing works
Algorithmic governance: Developing a research agenda through the power of collective intelligence
Danaher, J., Hogan, M. J., Noone, C., Kennedy, R., Behan, A., De Paor, A., Felzmann, H., Haklay, M., Khoo, S.-M., Morison, J., et al. (2017) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/2053951717726554 · Cited by 369 · see citing works
Smart Earth: A meta-review and implications for environmental governance
Bakker, K., & Ritts, M. (2018) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.07.011 · Cited by 244 · see citing works
Passi, S., & Jackson, S. J. (2018) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3274405 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
Generative AI in Higher Education: The ChatGPT Effect
Chan, C. K. Y., & Colloton, T. (2024) · Routledge · doi:10.4324/9781003459026 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Do big data-driven HR practices improve HR service quality and innovation competency of SMEs
Verma, S., Singh, V., & Bhattacharyya, S. S. (2021) · International Journal of Organizational Analysis · doi:10.1108/ijoa-04-2020-2128 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Lee, A., Inceoglu, I., Hauser, O., & Greene, M. (2022) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101426 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Poussart, D. (2021) · Éthique publique · doi:10.4000/ethiquepublique.6418 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kitchin, R., & McArdle, G.
- Affiliations
- National University of Ireland, Maynooth (IE)
- University College Dublin (IE)
- Corresponding author
- Kitchin, Rob
- Venue
- Big Data & Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2016-02-17
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2053-9517 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2277932823
- Cited by
- 606
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 30 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 91 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 86 · 2021: 81 · 2020: 69 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 80.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Big Data & Society (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Maynooth University ePrints and eTheses Archive (Maynooth University) (acceptedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Big Data Technologies and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Scientific Research and Philosophical Inquiry
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Keywords
- big data, exhaustivity, velocity, volume, varieties, scalability, relationality, indexicality, conceptual clarity, data classification
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review