Cited by 606Big Data Technologies and ApplicationsScientific Research and Philosophical InquiryEthics and Social Impacts of AI

What makes Big Data, Big Data? Exploring the ontological characteristics of 26 datasets

Open access
Kitchin, Rob, McArdle, Gavin·2016·Big Data & Society

Abstract

Big Data has been variously defined in the literature. In the main, definitions suggest that Big Data possess a suite of key traits: volume, velocity and variety (the 3Vs), but also exhaustivity, resolution, indexicality, relationality, extensionality and scalability. However, these definitions lack ontological clarity, with the term acting as an amorphous, catch-all label for a wide selection of data. In this paper, we consider the question ‘what makes Big Data, Big Data?’, applying Kitchin’s taxonomy of seven Big Data traits to 26 datasets drawn from seven domains, each of which is considered in the literature to constitute Big Data. The results demonstrate that only a handful of datasets possess all seven traits, and some do not possess either volume and/or variety. Instead, there are multiple forms of Big Data. Our analysis reveals that the key definitional boundary markers are the traits of velocity and exhaustivity. We contend that Big Data as an analytical category needs to be unpacked, with the genus of Big Data further delineated and its various species identified. It is only through such ontological work that we will gain conceptual clarity about what constitutes Big Data, formulate how best to make sense of it, and identify how it might be best used to make sense of the world.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2053951716631130

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Les données massives utilisées dans l'apprentissage machine, comme celles issues de réseaux sociaux, sont fréquemment contaminées par des biais de confirmation et de stéréotypes.

    “les données massives utilisées dans l’apprentissage machine, comme celles issues de réseaux sociaux, sont fréquemment contaminées par des biais de confirmation et de stéréotypes14.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kitchin, R., & McArdle, G.
Affiliations
  • National University of Ireland, Maynooth (IE)
  • University College Dublin (IE)
Corresponding author
Kitchin, Rob
Venue
Big Data & Society
Published
2016-02-17
Volume
3
Issue
1
ISSN
2053-9517 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2277932823
Cited by
606
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 91 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 86 · 2021: 81 · 2020: 69 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 1
FWCI
80.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Big Data & Society (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Maynooth University ePrints and eTheses Archive (Maynooth University) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Big Data Technologies and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Scientific Research and Philosophical Inquiry
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Keywords
big data, exhaustivity, velocity, volume, varieties, scalability, relationality, indexicality, conceptual clarity, data classification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review