The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Challenges in administrative data linkage for research
Open accessAbstract
Linkage of population-based administrative data is a valuable tool for combining detailed individual-level information from different sources for research. While not a substitute for classical studies based on primary data collection, analyses of linked administrative data can answer questions that require large sample sizes or detailed data on hard-to-reach populations, and generate evidence with a high level of external validity and applicability for policy making. There are unique challenges in the appropriate research use of linked administrative data, for example with respect to bias from linkage errors where records cannot be linked or are linked together incorrectly. For confidentiality and other reasons, the separation of data linkage processes and analysis of linked data is generally regarded as best practice. However, the 'black box' of data linkage can make it difficult for researchers to judge the reliability of the resulting linked data for their required purposes. This article aims to provide an overview of challenges in linking administrative data for research. We aim to increase understanding of the implications of (i) the data linkage environment and privacy preservation; (ii) the linkage process itself (including data preparation, and deterministic and probabilistic linkage methods) and (iii) linkage quality and potential bias in linked data. We draw on examples from a number of countries to illustrate a range of approaches for data linkage in different contexts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Journal of The American Statistical Association
Fienberg, S. E. (2005) · Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences · doi:10.1002/0471667196.ess1317 · Cited by 6,125
Benchimol, E. I., Smeeth, L., Guttmann, A., Harron, K., Moher, D., Petersen, I., Sørensen, H. T., von Elm, E., Langan, S. M., & RECORD Working Committee (2015) · PLOS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001885 · Cited by 5,749
Self-citationFellegi, I. P., & Sunter, A. B. (1969) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1969.10501049 · Cited by 2,475
The Swedish personal identity number: possibilities and pitfalls in healthcare and medical research
Ludvigsson, J. F., Otterblad-Olausson, P., Pettersson, B. U., & Ekbom, A. (2009) · European Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s10654-009-9350-y · Cited by 2,403
Newcombe, H. B., Kennedy, J. M., Axford, S. J., & James, A. P. (1959) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.130.3381.954 · Cited by 770
Rasella, D., Aquino, R., Santos, C. A., Paes-Sousa, R., & Barreto, M. L. (2013) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)60715-1 · Cited by 604
Self-citationUnique in the shopping mall: On the reidentifiability of credit card metadata
de Montjoye, Y.-A., Radaelli, L., Singh, V. K., & Pentland, A. “. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1256297 · Cited by 570
Holman, C. D. J., Bass, J. A., Rosman, D. L., Smith, M. B., Semmens, J. B., Glasson, E. J., Brook, E. L., Trutwein, B., Rouse, I. L., Watson, C. R., et al. (2008) · Australian Health Review · doi:10.1071/ah080766 · Cited by 507
Research use of linked health data - a best practice protocol
Kelman, C. W., Bass, A. J., & Holman, C. D. J. (2002) · Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1111/j.1467-842x.2002.tb00161.x · Cited by 437
Privacy-preserving record linkage using Bloom filters
Schnell, R., Bachteler, T., & Reiher, J. (2009) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/1472-6947-9-41 · Cited by 342
Cited by
CounterFAccTual: How FAccT Undermines Its Organizing Principles
Gansky, B., & McDonald, S. (2022) · 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3531146.3533241 · Cited by 34
Lageson, S., & Stewart, R. (2024) · Criminology · doi:10.1111/1745-9125.12359 · Cited by 20
Ayles, J., Lima, M., & Gupta, N. (2024) · International Journal of Population Data Science · doi:10.23889/ijpds.v9i1.2370 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Harron, K., Dibben, C., Boyd, J., Hjern, A., Azimaee, M., Barreto, M. L., & Goldstein, H.
- Venue
- Big Data & Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2017-12
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 205395171774567
- ISSN
- 2053-9517 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2775078427
- Cited by
- 357
- References
- 52
- FWCI
- 18.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Challenges in administrative data linkage for research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/2053951717745678
- The paper
- Harron, K., Dibben, C., Boyd, J., Hjern, A., Azimaee, M., Barreto, M. L., & Goldstein, H. (2017). Challenges in administrative data linkage for research. Big Data & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717745678
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
