Cited by 28Ethics and Social Impacts of AIInformation Systems Theories and ImplementationCybernetics and Technology in Society

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Occluded algorithms

Open access
Burke, Adam·2019·Big Data & Society

Abstract

Two definitions of algorithm, their uses, and their implied models of computing in society, are reviewed. The first, termed the structural programming definition, aligns more with usage in computer science, and as the name suggests, the intellectual project of structured programming. The second, termed the systemic definition, is more informal and emerges from ethnographic observations of discussions of software in both professional and everyday settings. Specific examples of locating algorithms within modern codebases are shared, as well as code directly impacting social and ethical concerns. The structural distinction between algorithms and social concerns is explained as mirroring the engineering construct of algorithms and data structures. It is proposed that, rather than this separation being an attempt to enforce a professional boundary and evade social responsibility, it is a crucial technical distinction within code which makes it clearer and more transparent. The power structures reinforced by the broader, cultural interpretations of algorithm are reconsidered, along with what it would mean for software to have an inclusive design culture.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2053951719858743

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Abadi M, 2016, OSDI, 16, 265
  2. 10.1145/355592.365646 · DOI
  3. Citron DK, 2014, Washington Law Review, 89, 1
  4. Cockburn A, 2002, Agile Software Development. (Vol. 177)
  5. 10.1177/2053951716665128 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1109/JRPROC.1953.274276 · DOI
  7. 10.1145/1008328.1008329 · DOI
  8. 10.1007/s10676-010-9233-7 · DOI
  9. 10.2307/j.ctt1pwt9w5 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Seaver N, 2017, Big Data & Society, 4, 1, 10.1177/2053951717738104 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.14506/ca33.3.04 · DOI
  12. 10.2307/j.ctvc77mp9.30 · DOI
  13. Yourdon EN, 1979, Classics in Software Engineering

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 28

Metadata

Authors
Burke, A.
Affiliations
New Centre of Research and Practice, Grand Rapids, USA
Corresponding author
Burke, Adam
Venue
Big Data & Society
Published
2019-07
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
205395171985874
ISSN
2053-9517 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4243767038
Cited by
28
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9
FWCI
5.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Big Data & Society (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Cybernetics and Technology in Society
Keywords
algorithms, structured programming, power structures, inclusive design, data structures, software ethics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Occluded algorithms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/2053951719858743
The paper
Burke, A. (2019). Occluded algorithms. Big Data & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951719858743