Cited by 32Big Data Technologies and ApplicationsComputational and Text Analysis MethodsData Analysis and Archiving

Ethnographic data in the age of big data: How to compare and combine

Open access
Bjerre-Nielsen, Andreas, Glavind, Kristoffer Lind·2022·Big Data & Society

Abstract

Big data enables researchers to closely follow the behavior of large groups of individuals by using high-frequency digital traces. However, these digital traces often lack context, and it is not always clear what is measured. In contrast, data from ethnographic fieldwork follows a limited number of individuals but can provide the context often lacking from big data. Yet, there is an under-explored potential in combining ethnographic data with big data and other digital data sources. This paper presents ways that quantitative research designs can combine big data and ethnographic data and account for the synergies that such combinations can provide. We highlight the differences and similarities between ethnographic data and big data, focusing on the three dimensions: individuals, depth of information, and time. We outline how ethnographic data can validate big data by providing a “ground truth” and complement it by giving a “thick description.” Further, we lay out ways that analysis carried out using big data could benefit from collaboration with ethnographers, and we discuss the potential within the fields of machine learning and causal inference.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/20539517211069893

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Abbott A (1997) Of time and space: The contemporary relevance of the chicago school. Social Forces 75(4): 1149 -1182.
  2. Abramson CM and Dohan D (2015) Beyond text: Using arrays to represent and analyze ethnographic data. Sociological methodology 45(1): 272 -319.
  3. Bernard HR (2017) Research Methods in Anthropology: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, chapter 13, pages 354 -356, 379 -381. Rowman & Little fi eld.
  4. Bjerre-Nielsen A, Kassarnig V, Lassen DD, et al. (2021) Task-speci fi c information outperforms surveillance-style big data in predictive analytics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118(14): 1 -3.
  5. Blok A, Carlsen HB, Jørgensen TB, et al. (2017) Stitching together the heterogeneous party: A complementary social data science experiment. Big Data & Society 4(2): 1 -15. DOI: 2053951717736337.
  6. Blok A and Pedersen MA (2014) Complementary social science? quali-quantitative experiments in a big data world. Big Data & Society 1(2): 1 -6. DOI: 2053951714543908.
  7. Buyalskaya A, Gallo M and Camerer CF (2021) The golden age of social science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118(5).
  8. Charles V and Gherman T (2019) Big Data Analytics and Ethnography: Together for the Greater Good . 19 -33, Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  9. Cury M, Whitworth E, Barfort S et al. (2019) Hybrid methodology: Combining ethnography, cognitive science, and machine learning to inform the development of context-aware personal computing and assistive technology. Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference Proceedings .
  10. Dohan D and Sanchez-Jankowski M (1998) Using computers to analyze ethnographic fi eld data: Theoretical and practical considerations. Annual review of Sociology 24(1): 477 -498.
  11. Driver HE and Kroeber AL (1932) Quantitative expression of cultural relationships. Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology 31(4): 211 -256.
  12. Ferguson CJ (2017) Everything in moderation: Moderate use of screens unassociated with child behavior problems. Psychiatric Quarterly 88(4): 797 -805.
  13. Gandomi A and Haider M (2015) Beyond the hype: Big data concepts, methods, and analytics. International Journal of Information Management 35(2): 137 -144.
  14. Geertz C (1973) Thick description: Towards an interpretive theory of culture. In Geertz, C., editor, The Interpretation of Cultures , volume 3, pages 143 -168. Basic Books.
  15. Glavind KL, Andersen A and Bjerre-Nielsen A (2021) Smartphone use is socially contagious. Unpublished working paper . Available as Chapter 3 at: https://www.econ.ku.dk/ forskning-og-publikationer/Publikationer/ph.d ˙ se.
  16. Hammersley M (2007) Ethnography. In The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology . John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
  17. Marres N (2012) The redistribution of methods: On intervention in digital social research, broadly conceived. The Sociological Review 60: 139 -165.
  18. Marres N and Gerlitz C (2016) Interface methods: Renegotiating relations between digital social research, sts and sociology. The Sociological Review 64(1): 21 -46.
  19. Moats D (2021) Rethinking the ' great divide ' . Science & Technology Studies 34(1): 19 -42.
  20. Murdock GP (1967) Ethnographic atlas: A summary. Ethnology 6(2): 109 -236.
  21. O ' Reilly K (2012) Ethnographic methods, second edition , chapter 8. Routledge.
  22. Pedersen MA (2019) Anthropology of/as repetition. History and Anthropology 30(2): 226 -232.
  23. Rajpurkar P, Zhang J, Lopyrev K, et al. (2016) Squad: 100, 000+ questions for machine comprehension of text. In Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , pages 2383 -2392.
  24. Rogers R (2009) The End of the Virtual: Digital Methods , volume Inaugural Lecture 339. Amsterdam University Press.
  25. Stopczynski A, Sekara V, Sapiezynski P, et al. (2014) Measuring large-scale social networks with high resolution. PloS one 9(4): e95978.
  26. Venturini T, Munk AK and Jacomy M (2019) Actor-network versus network analysis versus digital networks: Are we talking about the same networks? In Digital STS : A Field Guide for Science & Technology Studies , pages 510 -524. Princeton University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bjerre-Nielsen, A., & Glavind, K. L.
Affiliations
University of Copenhagen (DK)
Corresponding author
Glavind, Kristoffer Lind
Venue
Big Data & Society
Published
2022-01
Volume
9
Issue
1
ISSN
2053-9517 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4210909911
Cited by
32
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 2
FWCI
5.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Big Data & Society (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Big Data Technologies and Applications
  • Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Computational and Text Analysis Methods
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Data Analysis and Archiving
Keywords
ethnographic data, big data, digital traces, fieldwork, ground truth, thick description, interdisciplinary collaboration, machine learning, causal inference, research design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review