Cited by 85Digitalization, Law, and RegulationEthics and Social Impacts of AIPrivacy, Security, and Data Protection

Predictive privacy: Collective data protection in the context of artificial intelligence and big data

Open access
Mühlhoff, Rainer·2023·Big Data & Society

Abstract

Big data and artificial intelligence pose a new challenge for data protection as these techniques allow predictions to be made about third parties based on the anonymous data of many people. Examples of predicted information include purchasing power, gender, age, health, sexual orientation, ethnicity, etc. The basis for such applications of “predictive analytics” is the comparison between behavioral data (e.g. usage, tracking, or activity data) of the individual in question and the potentially anonymously processed data of many others using machine learning models or simpler statistical methods. The article starts by noting that predictive analytics has a significant potential to be abused, which manifests itself in the form of social inequality, discrimination, and exclusion. These potentials are not regulated by current data protection law in the EU; indeed, the use of anonymized mass data takes place in a largely unregulated space. Under the term “predictive privacy,” a data protection approach is presented that counters the risks of abuse of predictive analytics. A person's predictive privacy is violated when personal information about them is predicted without their knowledge and against their will based on the data of many other people. Predictive privacy is then formulated as a protected good and improvements to data protection with regard to the regulation of predictive analytics are proposed. Finally, the article points out that the goal of data protection in the context of predictive analytics is the regulation of “prediction power,” which is a new manifestation of informational power asymmetry between platform companies and society.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/20539517231166886

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • GAI may inadvertently expose users' private and personal information to third parties through two primary pathways.

    “In general, GAI may inadvertently expose users' private and personal information to third parties through two primary pathways (Mühlhoff 2023; Wu et al. 2024).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 37 · Cited by 85

Authors
Mühlhoff, R.
Affiliations
Osnabrück University (DE)
Corresponding author
Mühlhoff, Rainer
Venue
Big Data & Society
Published
2023-01
Volume
10
Issue
1
ISSN
2053-9517 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4366122041
Cited by
85
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 7
FWCI
152.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Big Data & Society (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Keywords
predictive analytics, data protection, big data, artificial intelligence, anonymized data, predictive power, discrimination, social inequality, exclusion, EU data protection law, platform companies, behavioral data

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review