The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The curious case of blockchain in rural China: Unravelling power, profit, and surveillance
Open accessAbstract
Blockchain originated from the aspiration for decentralization, and in Western countries, its association with freedom from governmental and corporate dominance remains unwavering. However, in China–where blockchain has taken an intriguing foothold–the socio-technical imaginaries of blockchain diverge significantly. As China rises in blockchain development, critical literature examining its ventures is notably lacking. This article analyses state-led initiatives and corporate endeavours related to blockchain deployment in rural China. While blockchain's roots lie in libertarian ideals, within China, it serves as a ‘state techno-solutionist’ tool, empowering authoritarian capitalism for enhanced state control and corporate profit through data exploitation. Although the application of blockchain in agricultural tracing and finance is heralded as a blessing to elevate smallholder farmers from poverty and enhance agricultural practices, the reality contrasts sharply. Instead of empowering farmers, the technology exacerbates power imbalances, embedding them in a system marked by extensive data harvesting and surveillance. Such integration entangles these farmers subsisting on China's economic fringes within broader national and global capitalist financial frameworks, rendering them more susceptible to exploitation and manipulation. Moreover, blockchain in rural China epitomizes authoritarian capitalism, where capitalists aligning closely with state agendas. Blockchain's transparency, traceability, and tamper-resistant features, instead of diminishing government interference, are harnessed by capitalists to amplify the social credit system, strengthening the data dominance of platform companies and supporting state surveillance. Therefore, blockchain emerges as a threat to rural China's ways of life–all driven by the pursuit of corporate profit and the government's quest to reclaim national greatness.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In the Global North, blockchain is celebrated for decentralization and empowerment (Hung, 2024).”
From Decentralizing governance: exploring the dynamics and challenges of digital commons and DAOs (2025) · cites this paper as Hung, 2024
In the citing paper
“Due to the energy-intensive nature of Proof-of-Work (PoW) cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, blockchain projects tend to exploit local resources without offering commensurate bene fi ts to host communities in a process known as ' crypto-parasitism ' . (Hung, 2024)”
From Decentralizing governance: exploring the dynamics and challenges of digital commons and DAOs (2025) · cites this paper as Hung, 2024
Citations
Cites
Crandall, J. (2019) · Design and Culture · doi:10.1080/17547075.2019.1673989 · Cited by 64 · cited 1×
“Although often being portrayed as revolutionary, the socio-technical con fi gurations of blockchain frequently serve to maintain the status quo or concentrate wealth to enhance the ef fi - ciency of existing powers (Crandall, 2019).”
Blockchain financialization, neo-colonialism, and Binance
Jutel, O. (2023) · Frontiers in Blockchain · doi:10.3389/fbloc.2023.1160257 · Cited by 13
Research works printed but not linked: 71
- 10.1111/dech.12027 · DOI
- Andrejevic M, 2014, International Journal of Communication, 8, 1673
- 10.1007/978-3-319-76014-8_8 · DOI
- 10.5539/jas.v12n9p192 · DOI
- Campbell-Verduyn M, 2023, Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 239965442311628
- 10.1093/oso/9780198823940.003.0003 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cjar.2023.100292 · DOI
- 10.1177/0163443718772147 · DOI
- 10.16997/book29.d · DOI
- 10.1016/j.trac.2018.08.011 · DOI
- Gan L, 2020, 当代经济研究 [Contemporary Economic Research], 294, 33
- Gladstein A, 2022, Check Your Financial Privilege.
- Gray B, 2018, Digital Farmer Profiles: Reimagining Smallholder Agriculture
- 10.1177/1024529420965524 · DOI
- 10.1080/13563467.2018.1562437 · DOI
- 10.1080/17579961.2020.1727094 · DOI
- 10.1353/jod.2022.0019 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.marpol.2020.103873 · DOI
- 10.3389/fbloc.2020.00022 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cie.2020.107079 · DOI
- 10.1086/720144 · DOI
- Huang Z, 2012, 开放时代 [Open Times], 3, 88
- 10.1007/s11024-009-9124-4 · DOI
- Jiang G, 2022, 江⻄财经大学学报 [Journal of Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics], 1, 111
- 10.3390/land11111980 · DOI
- 10.1177/2053951720985249 · DOI
- 10.3389/fsufs.2022.903230 · DOI
- 10.1080/08854300.2017.1332262 · DOI
- 10.3389/fcomm.2022.727647 · DOI
- 10.3389/fbloc.2021.720347 · DOI
- 10.3390/su14138044 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev-resource-111220-014147 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-031-33944-8_4 · DOI
- Lan Y, 2020, 链能:区块链与产业变革、治理现代化 [Chain Power: Blockchain and Industrial Transformation, Modernizing Governance]
- Lei M, 2022, Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 11, 2262
- 10.1177/0097700409360745 · DOI
- Liang J, 2015, 宏观经济研究 [Macroeconomics], 3, 58
- Lin LY-H, 2023, The China Quarterly, 1
- 10.2478/popets-2021-0050 · DOI
- 10.1080/0144929X.2022.2068070 · DOI
- 10.1525/as.2021.1428111 · DOI
- Liu H, 2014, 经济导刊 [Economic Herald], 9, 45
- 10.3390/su14073905 · DOI
- 10.1080/02681102.2021.1925619 · DOI
- Patel N, 2021, Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, 4286
- 10.1111/1750-3841.15477 · DOI
- Qingyuan Daily and Wanting, 2020, Information Engineering & Technology, 6, 24
- Quintais JP, 2019, Stanford Journal of Blockchain Law & Policy, 2, 86
- 10.1177/20539517231159629 · DOI
- 10.1177/20539517231205479 · DOI
- 10.3390/s23146290 · DOI
- 10.1080/00472336.2022.2093774 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cie.2020.106895 · DOI
- Swa M, 2015, Blockchain: Blueprint for a New Economy
- 10.1111/j.1471-0366.2012.00377.x · DOI
- 10.1080/13563467.2022.2101633 · DOI
- Tong Z, 2010, 中国合作经济评论 [Chinese Cooperative Economy Review], 4, 60
- 10.1108/17561371011044261 · DOI
- Wang F, 2020, Rural Economy and Science-Technology [农村经济与科技], 31, 71
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121742 · DOI
- Wang X, 2020, Blockchain Chicken Farm: And Other Stories of Tech in China’s Countryside
- Whitehouse-Levine M, 2020, Self-Hosted Wallets and the Future of Free Societies: A Guide for Policymakers
- 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199654925.013.006 · DOI
- Xi J (2022) 坚持把解决好“三农”问题作为全党工作重中之重 举全党全社会之力推动乡村振兴 [Upholding the resolution of the ‘three rural’ issues as the central focus of party work: mobilizing the entire party and society for rural revitalization]. 求是 [Qiushi] 7(1): 4–17.
- 10.3389/fbloc.2020.00007 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.aiia.2020.08.002 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-031-13276-6_13 · DOI
- Zhang R, 2018, 中国农村经济 [Chinese Rural Economy], 5, 84
- Zhen L, 2021, International Journal of Communication, 15, 886
- 10.4000/chinaperspectives.15869 · DOI
- Zhong D, 2008, 清华大学学报:哲学社会科学版 [Journal of Tsinghua University, Philosophy and Social Sciences], 8, 146
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Decentralizing governance: exploring the dynamics and challenges of digital commons and DAOs
Esposito, M., Tse, T., & Goh, D. (2025) · Frontiers in Blockchain · doi:10.3389/fbloc.2025.1538227 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Hung, A. H.-C.
- Affiliations
- Australian National University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Hung, Alvin Hoi-Chun
- ORCID
- Hung, Alvin Hoi-Chun
- Venue
- Big Data & Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2024-06
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 2053-9517 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4399293905
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 4.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Big Data & Society (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › COVID-19 Digital Contact Tracing
- Keywords
- blockchain, rural China, authoritarian capitalism, government surveillance, data exploitation, smallholder farmers, social credit system, platform companies, power imbalance, data sovereignty, decentralization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review