The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Artificial intelligence and medical education: A global mixed-methods study of medical students’ perspectives
Open accessAbstract
Objective: Medical students, as clinicians and healthcare leaders of the future, are key stakeholders in the clinical roll-out of artificial intelligence-driven technologies. The authors aim to provide the first report on the state of artificial intelligence in medical education globally by exploring the perspectives of medical students. Methods: The authors carried out a mixed-methods study of focus groups and surveys with 128 medical students from 48 countries. The study explored knowledge around artificial intelligence as well as what students wished to learn about artificial intelligence and how they wished to learn this. A combined qualitative and quantitative analysis was used. Results: Support for incorporating teaching on artificial intelligence into core curricula was ubiquitous across the globe, but few students had received teaching on artificial intelligence. Students showed knowledge on the applications of artificial intelligence in clinical medicine as well as on artificial intelligence ethics. They were interested in learning about clinical applications, algorithm development, coding and algorithm appraisal. Hackathon-style projects and multidisciplinary education involving computer science students were suggested for incorporation into the curriculum. Conclusions: Medical students from all countries should be provided teaching on artificial intelligence as part of their curriculum to develop skills and knowledge around artificial intelligence to ensure a patient-centred digital future in medicine. This teaching should focus on the applications of artificial intelligence in clinical medicine. Students should also be given the opportunity to be involved in algorithm development. Students in low- and middle-income countries require the foundational technology as well as robust teaching on artificial intelligence to ensure that they can drive innovation in their healthcare settings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“A need for integration of AI knowledge into core curricula has also been widely expressed among medical students78.”
From Orchestrating explainable artificial intelligence for multimodal and longitudinal data in medical imaging (2024) · cites this paper as [78]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In contrast, a few of them employed either qualitative methods [38–40] or a mixed-methods approach [41–45].”
From Artificial intelligence in undergraduate medical education: an updated scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as [41]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The disparity in AI exposure between students in HICs and LMICs—where formal AI education remains limited or absent [24, 41]—underscores persistent global inequities in access to AI-related educational resources”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gale, N. K., Heath, G., Cameron, E., Rashid, S., & Redwood, S. (2013) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-13-117 · Cited by 10,865
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
Topol, E. J. (2019) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0300-7 · Cited by 10,450
Gulshan, V., Peng, L., Coram, M., Stumpe, M. C., Wu, D., Narayanaswamy, A., Venugopalan, S., Widner, K., Madams, T., Cuadros, J., et al. (2016) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2016.17216 · Cited by 7,697
Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations
Obermeyer, Z., Powers, B., Vogeli, C., & Mullainathan, S. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aax2342 · Cited by 7,137 · cited 1×
“15,16 19 This raises the possibility that clinicians in LMICs will be ill-equipped to utilise AI-based technology to meet the needs of their health systems.”
BackgroundEhteshami Bejnordi, B., Veta, M., Johannes van Diest, P., van Ginneken, B., Karssemeijer, N., Litjens, G., van der Laak, J. A. W. M., and the CAMELYON16 Consortium, Hermsen, M., Manson, Q. F., et al. (2017) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2017.14585 · Cited by 3,293
Key challenges for delivering clinical impact with artificial intelligence
Kelly, C. J., Karthikesalingam, A., Suleyman, M., Corrado, G., & King, D. (2019) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-019-1426-2 · Cited by 3,136
Ardila, D., Kiraly, A. P., Bharadwaj, S., Choi, B., Reicher, J. J., Peng, L., Tse, D., Etemadi, M., Ye, W., Corrado, G., et al. (2019) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-019-0447-x · Cited by 2,167
Artificial intelligence in cancer imaging: Clinical challenges and applications
Bi, W. L., Hosny, A., Schabath, M. B., Giger, M. L., Birkbak, N. J., Mehrtash, A., Allison, T., Arnaout, O., Abbosh, C., Dunn, I. F., et al. (2019) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21552 · Cited by 1,846
Potential Biases in Machine Learning Algorithms Using Electronic Health Record Data
Gianfrancesco, M. A., Tamang, S., Yazdany, J., & Schmajuk, G. (2018) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.3763 · Cited by 1,395 · cited 2×
“15,16 19 This raises the possibility that clinicians in LMICs will be ill-equipped to utilise AI-based technology to meet the needs of their health systems.”
BackgroundArtificial intelligence and the future of global health
Schwalbe, N., & Wahl, B. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30226-9 · Cited by 956
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Bi WL, 2019, CA: A Cancer J Clin, 69, 127
- Oakden-Rayner L, 2019, Radiol: Artif Intel, 1
- Wong BLH, 2021, Hum Resour Health, 19
- van Kessel R, 2022, Internet Intervention, 27
- Khurana MP, 2022, BMC Med Educ, 22
- Likert R, 1932, Arch of Psychol, 140, 5
- 10.2196/33819 · DOI
- Boutayeb A, 2010, In: Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg, 100, 532
- Topol E. The topol review. Preparing the Healthcare Workforce to Deliver the Digital Future. Report on behalf of the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, February 2019.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A scoping review of artificial intelligence in medical education: BEME Guide No. 84
Gordon, M., Daniel, M., Ajiboye, A., Uraiby, H., Xu, N. Y., Bartlett, R., Hanson, J., Haas, M., Spadafore, M., Grafton-Clarke, C., et al. (2024) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/0142159x.2024.2314198 · Cited by 679
Bekbolatova, M., Mayer, J., Ong, C. W., & Toma, M. (2024) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare12020125 · Cited by 450
Mousavi Baigi, S. F., Sarbaz, M., Ghaddaripouri, K., Ghaddaripouri, M., Mousavi, A. S., & Kimiafar, K. (2023) · Health Science Reports · doi:10.1002/hsr2.1138 · Cited by 255
The Advent of Generative Language Models in Medical Education
Karabacak, M., Ozkara, B. B., Margetis, K., Wintermark, M., & Bisdas, S. (2023) · JMIR Medical Education · doi:10.2196/48163 · Cited by 208
Tolentino, R., Baradaran, A., Gore, G., Pluye, P., & Abbasgholizadeh-Rahimi, S. (2024) · JMIR Medical Education · doi:10.2196/54793 · Cited by 165
Metadata
- Authors
- Ejaz, H., McGrath, H., Wong, B. L., Guise, A., Vercauteren, T., & Shapey, J.
- Affiliations
- University of East Anglia (GB)
- King's College London (GB)
- Department of International Health, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
- School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King’s College London, UK
- Corresponding author
- Ejaz, Hamza
- McGrath, Hari
- Venue
- DIGITAL HEALTH
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2022-01
- Volume
- 8
- Pages
- 205520762210890
- ISSN
- 2055-2076 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9067043
- OpenAlex
- W4229033576
- Cited by
- 105
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 14
- FWCI
- 6.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Digital Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (acceptedVersion)
- London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Medical Engineering ([WT203148/Z/16/Z])
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence in medical education, medical students' perceptions, AI curriculum, AI ethics education, algorithm development, multidisciplinary education, hackathons, low- and middle-income countries
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
