CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 15Health Literacy and Information AccessibilityDigital literacy in educationLibrary Science and Information Literacy

Digital natives: A systematic review of the digital health literacy and influencing factors among Chinese college students

Open access
Jiang, Jiajun, Zhou, Mei, Yin, Zhihua, Cui, Yuqing, Liu, Sishuai·2025·DIGITAL HEALTH
DOI 10.1177/20552076251346006PMC PMC12107012
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to explore the current status of digital health literacy (DHL) among Chinese college students, and to summarize and analyze the related influencing factors. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in Web of Science, PubMed, EBSCO, Scopus, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data, and VIP databases for relevant literature published between 1 January 2006 and 30 May 2024. Results: A total of 32 articles, with sample sizes ranging from 224 to 16,497 participants, were included in this review. The e-Health Literacy Scale was the most commonly used measurement for DHL among China college students. The level of DHL among Chinese college students was not high, which was associated with a variable of factors. Based on the social ecological model, the influencing factors at the individual level included age, gender, depression and anxiety status, self-rated health status, frequency of physical exercise, participation in health club activities, taking health courses, and attitude toward health; at the interpersonal level, the influencing factors included family income, parents’ education level, family structure, and only child status; at the organizational level, influencing factors included major, grade, and interpersonal relationships; at the community level, influencing factors included hukou and place of origin. Conclusions: The findings of this review provide valuable insights for the development of targeted health education interventions and policies to enhance DHL among Chinese college students. Future research should prioritize nationwide studies to further investigate the factors influencing DHL among Chinese college students and to develop more scientifically rigorous and effective measurement tools for DHL.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/20552076251346006

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 77

  1. [2]Norman CD Skinner HA. Ehealth literacy: essential skills for consumer health in a networked world. J Med Internet Res 2006; 8: e9. PMC1550701 16867972
  2. [3]Chen SC Hong Nguyen NT Lin CY, et al. Digital health literacy and well-being among university students: mediating roles of fear of COVID-19, information satisfaction, and internet information search. Digit Health 2023; 9: 20552076231165970. 37009305 PMC10052480
  3. [5]Evanthia S Okan O Dadaczynski K, et al. Digital health literacy and information seeking on the internet in relation to COVID-19 among university students in Greece. Comput Methods Programs Biomed Update 2024; 5: 100139.
  4. [6]Jiang L Guo X Lu B, et al. The correlation between eHealth literacy and physical health of college students. Chin J Sch Health 2022; 7: 990– 994.
  5. [7]Almeida S Pinto E Correia M, et al. Evaluating E-health literacy, knowledge, attitude, and health online information in Portuguese university students: a cross-sectional study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2024; 21: 271. 38541272 PMC10970587
  6. [8]Chong YY Cheng HY Chan HYL, et al. COVID-19 pandemic, infodemic and the role of eHealth literacy. Int J Nurs Stud 2020; 108: 103644. 32447127 PMC7255119
  7. [9]Tumer A Sumen A. E-health literacy levels of high school students in Turkey: results of a cross-sectional study. Health Promot Int 2022; 37: 74. 34718540
  8. [10]Holt KA Overgaard D Engel LV, et al. Health literacy, digital literacy and eHealth literacy in danish nursing students at entry and graduate level: a cross-sectional study. BMC Nurs 2020; 19: 22. 32308559 PMC7149891
  9. [11]Britt RK Collins WB Wilson K, et al. Ehealth literacy and health behaviors affecting modern college students: a pilot study of issues identified by the American college health association. J Med Internet Res 2017; 19: e392. PMC5750421 29258979
  10. [12]National Bureau of Statistics of China. China statistical yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2020.
  11. [14]Ma L Tang Y Hu XQ, et al. Systematic review of the effects of physical activity on young children's cognitive development and academic performance. China Sport Sci Technol 2022; 58: 18– 27.
  12. [15]Zhang DQ Lu YL Liu Y. Determinants and correlates of physical activity and sedentary behavior in Chinese children and adolescents: a systematic review. China Sport Sci 2019; 39: 62– 75.
  13. [17]Moola SMZ Tufanaru C Aromataris E, et al. Chapter 7: systematic reviews of etiology and risk. JBI Manual Evid Synth 2020; 2: 8– 20.
  14. [18]Liberali R Del Castanhel F Kupek E, et al. Latent class analysis of lifestyle risk factors and association with overweight and/or obesity in children and adolescents: systematic review. Child Obes 2021; 17: 2– 15. 33306451
  15. [19]Sallis JF Prochaska JJ Taylor WC. A review of correlates of physical activity of children and adolescents. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000; 32: 963– 975. 10795788
  16. [20]Qian Y Liang Z Yu Y. Analysis of influencing factors of eHealth literacy among college students based on anderson model. Chin J Occup Med 2023; 6: 677– 682.
  17. [21]Li S Cui G Kaminga AC, et al. Associations between health literacy, eHealth literacy, and COVID-19-related health behaviors among Chinese college students: cross-sectional online study. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23: e25600. PMC8104003 33822734
  18. [22]Ma Y Zhou M Yu W, et al. Using the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) and e-health literacy (e-HL) to investigate the tobacco control intentions and behaviors of non-smoking college students in China: a cross-sectional investigation. BMC Public Health 2023; 23: 765. 37098499 PMC10127360
  19. [23]Guo S Yu X Sun Y, et al. The Chinese translation and validation of the eHEALS. Chin J Health Educ 2013; 2: 106– 108.
  20. [24]Tang Z Wang F Fu H. Development and evaluation of e-media health literacy scale for college students. Chin J Health Educ 2014; 1: 35– 38.
  21. [25]Ning L Zheng Z Liu M, et al. Profiles of digital health literacy among university students and its association with mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: a latent profile analysis. Digit Health 2024; 10: 20552076231224596. 38205038 PMC10777787
  22. [26]Ha L Chang Q Chen X. The effect of eHealth literacy on well-being among medical students: the chain mediating role of basic psychological needs and negative emotions. Chin J Health Psychol 2023; 31: 1381– 1388.
  23. [27]Sun C Yin Y Yu P, et al. Analysis of eHealth literacy and its influencing factors among freshmen in a medical university in Shandong province. Pract Prev Med 2019; 26: 1101– 1103.
  24. [28]Chen J Tian H. Associations and gender differences between OHI-seeking behaviors and eHealth literacy among Chinese university students. Rev Esc Enferm USP 2024; 58: e20230340. PMC11021020 38602487
  25. [30]Estrela M Semedo G Roque F, et al. Sociodemographic determinants of digital health literacy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Med Inform 2023; 177: 105124. 37329766
  26. [31]Stellefson M Hanik B Chaney B, et al. Ehealth literacy among college students: a systematic review with implications for eHealth education. J Med Internet Res 2011; 13: e102. PMC3278088 22155629
  27. [32]Hao S Tu X Liang S, et al. Current status and correlation analysis of health self-management ability and eHealth literacy among medical students. Occup Health 2023; 39: 389– 394.
  28. [33]Tu X Hao S Liang S, et al. Study on eHealth literacy and its relationship with self-rated health among lower grade medical undergraduates. Health Vocat Educ 2022; 40: 131– 135.
  29. [34]Wang Y Wang Y Nie J, et al. Family socioeconomic status and internet altruistic behavior among Chinese adolescents: the mediating effect of personal belief in a just world and emotional intelligence. Child Youth Serv Rev 2023; 121: 105841.
  30. [35]Wang X Zhang X Zhao R, et al. E-health literacy levels and influencing factors among 1002 undergraduates. Chin J Sch Doctors 2023; 37: 959– 960.
  31. [36]Tian X. Current status and influencing factors of eHealth literacy among undergraduate nursing freshmen in a medical college in Shandong province. Occup Health 2019; 35: 1693– 1696.
  32. [37]Niu Z Li X. Current status and influencing factors of eHealth literacy among college students in Xinjiang. Med Inform 2022; 35: 10– 13.
  33. [38]Wang H Jiang W Pan Y. A study on the current situation and influencing factors of eHealth literacy among medical undergraduates. J Nanjing Med Univ (Soc Sci Ed) 2024; 24: 282– 288.
  34. [39]Mai J Zhou L Lin L. A cross-sectional study on eHealth literacy of college students in Guangzhou. Health Vocat Educ 2021; 39: 56– 57.
  35. [40]Kim SY Park S. The effects of socioeconomic status on digital health literacy among adolescents. J Korean Med Sci 2018; 33: e290.
  36. [41]Çetin M Gümüş R. Research into the relationship between digital health literacy and healthy lifestyle behaviors: an intergenerational comparison. Front Public Health 2023; 11: 1259412. 38074767 PMC10699138
  37. [42]Broer M Bai Y Fonseca F. A review of the literature on socioeconomic Status and educational achievement. IEA Res Educ 2019; 5: 5– 7.
  38. [43]Xie C Li S Hu J. The relationship between social support, eHealth literacy and depressive symptoms in female nursing students. Chin J Sch Health 2020; 41: 716– 719.
  39. [44]Meng S Shen C. Survey on eHealth literacy and behavior status of college students in a university in Nanjing. Chin J Health Educ 2018; 34: 254– 257.
  40. [45]Xu H Li S Cui G. Path analysis of online social support, eHealth literacy and health-related behaviors among college students in Jinan. Chin Health Stat 2022; 39: 118– 121.
  41. [46]Wu Q Zhao G Gong J, et al. Current status and correlation analysis of eHealth literacy and healthy lifestyle among college students in Wuhan. Med Soc 2022; 35: 78– 83.
  42. [47]Zhang J Zhong M Chen Z. Study on the association between eHealth literacy and health behavior among college students in Guangzhou. Chin J Public Health Manag 2023; 39: 497– 501.
  43. [48]Cui G Li S Yin Y, et al. Medical students’ eHealth literacy status and influencing factors. Mod Prev Med 2020; 47: 1148– 1152.
  44. [49]Zou X. Survey on eHealth literacy status of college students in Guangzhou. Health Educ Health Promot 2022; 17: 577– 580.
  45. [50]Luo L Song N Yuan J, et al. The relationship between eHealth literacy and dysmenorrhea management behavior among female college students in Guizhou province. Mod Prev Med 2021; 48: 4317– 4321.
  46. [51]Ruan T Tang F. Survey on the current situation of eHealth literacy and health risk behaviors of college students majoring in elderly services in Hunan province. Chin High Med Educ 2024; 1: 52– 54.
  47. [52]Liu J Yin Y Fan Y. The relationship between eHealth literacy and illness behavior among college students in Jinan. Chin J Sch Health 2020; 10: 1502– 1505.
  48. [53]Pan C Zhu L Feng K, et al. E-health literacy status and influencing factors among college students in Guangdong province during the COVID-19 epidemic. South China Prev Med 2021; 47: 852– 856.
  49. [56]Chen P Li F Harmer P. Healthy China 2030: moving from blueprint to action with a new focus on public health. Lancet Public Health 2019; 4: e447. 31493840
  50. [57]Li X Li XH. A survey and countermeasure suggestions on college students’ online health information search behavior for eHealth literacy. Library Theory Pract 2017; 4: 44– 50.
  51. [58]Fang Y Wang ZY Yu L, et al. The influence of college students’ eHealth literacy and health anxiety metacognition on their expectations for participation in medical decision-making. Psychol Monthly 2024; 19: 60– 64.
  52. [59]Schueller SM Neary M. Discovery of and interest in health apps among those with mental health needs: survey and focus group study. J Med Internet Res 2018; 20: e10141. PMC6018235 29891468
  53. [60]Mitsutake S Shibata A Ishii K, et al. Associations of eHealth literacy with health behavior among adult internet users. J Med Internet Res 2016; 18: e192. PMC4969548 27432783
  54. [61]Paige SR Stellefson M Krieger JL, et al. Transactional eHealth literacy: developing and testing a multi-dimensional instrument. J Health Commun 2019; 24: 737– 748. 31583963 PMC7366705
  55. [62]Dadaczynski K Okan O Messer M, et al. Digital health literacy and web-based information-seeking behaviors of university students in Germany during the COVID-19 pandemic: cross-sectional survey study. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23: e24097. PMC7813561 33395396
  56. [63]Norman C. Ehealth literacy 2.0: problems and opportunities with an evolving concept. J Med Internet Res 2011; 13: e125. PMC3278111 22193243
  57. [64]Hagan JE Quansah F Frimpong JB, et al. Gender digital health literacy gap across age: a moderated moderation effect on depression among in-school adolescents in Ghana during COVID-19. Psychol Sch 2023; 60: 3452– 3468.
  58. [65]Kemp E Trigg J Beatty L, et al. Health literacy, digital health literacy and the implementation of digital health technologies in cancer care: the need for a strategic approach. Health Promot J Austr 2021; 32: 104– 114. 32681656
  59. [66]Telama R. Tracking of physical activity from childhood to adulthood: a review. Obes Facts 2009; 2: 187– 195. 20054224 PMC6516203
  60. [67]Shi Y Ma D Zhang J, et al. In the digital age: a systematic literature review of the e-health literacy and influencing factors among Chinese older adults. Z Gesundh Wiss 2023; 31: 679– 687. 34104627 PMC8175232
  61. [68]Liu R Xu S. The effect of perceived stress on eHealth literacy among college students: the mediating role of psychological resilience. J Jining Med Univ 2023; 46: 174– 178.
  62. [69]Ausserhofer D Piccoliori G Engl A, et al. Community-dwelling older adults’ readiness for adopting digital health technologies: cross-sectional survey study. JMIR Form Res 2024; 8: e54120. PMC11094597 38687989
  63. [70]Prensky M. Digital natives, digital immigrants. On Horiz 2001; 9: 1– 6.
  64. [72]Wrzus C Hanel M Wagner J, et al. Social network changes and life events across the lifespan: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 2013; 139: 53– 80. 22642230
  65. [73]Dammeyer J. College students’ health and health behaviors: a review of the literature. J Am Coll Health 2019; 67: 709– 722.
  66. [74]McEwen BS Sapolsky RM. Stress and cognitive function. Curr Opin Neurobiol 1995; 5: 205– 216. 7620309
  67. [75]Bandura A. Health promotion from the perspective of social cognitive theory. Psychol Health 1998; 13: 623– 649.
  68. [76]Coşkun AB Kenner C Elmaoğlu E. Neonatal intensive care nurses’ perceptions of artificial intelligence: a qualitative study on discharge education and family counseling. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs 2024. DOI: 10.1097/JPN.0000000000000904 39740134 · DOI
  69. [77]Park H Lee E. Self-reported eHealth literacy among undergraduate nursing students in South Korea: a pilot study. Nurse Educ Today 2015; 35: 408– 413. 25466791
  70. [78]Rathnayake S Senevirathna A. Self-reported eHealth literacy skills among nursing students in Sri Lanka: a cross-sectional study. Nurse Educ Today 2019; 78: 50– 56. 31082746
  71. [79]Elmaoğlu E Coşkun AB Yüzer Alsaç S. Digital transformation: the role, potential, and limitations of ChatGPT in child health education. Am J Health Educ 2023; 55: 69– 72.
  72. [80]Cramer A Keinki C Saur F, et al. Ehealth literacy, internet and eHealth service usage: a survey among a German municipality. J Public Health (Berl) 2023; 2: 616– 620.
  73. [81]Dong Y Qin W Xu L, et al. E-health literacy and its influencing factors among residents aged 15 years and above in Tai′an city. Chin J Public Health 2021; 37: 19– 22.
  74. [82]Xie T Zhang N Mao Y, et al. How to predict the electronic health literacy of Chinese primary and secondary school students? Establishment of a model and web nomograms. BMC Public Health 2022; 22: 1048. 35614408 PMC9132355
  75. [83]Khan RK Misra R Shawley-Brzoska S, et al. Predictors of diabetes risk perception among college students. J Am Coll Health 2022; 70: 1803– 1809. 33048650 PMC8041907
  76. [84]Patel S Sreelal BS Kalyani S, et al. Digital health literacy among the ageing population: a comparative cross-sectional study between rural and urban Telangana, India. Med J Armed Forces India 2024; 80: 313– 319. 38799990 PMC11117001
  77. [85]Coşkun AB Elmaoğlu E Buran C, et al. Integration of ChatGPT and E-health literacy: opportunities, challenges, and a Look towards the future. J Health Rep Technol 2024; 10: e139748.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jiang, J., Zhou, M., Yin, Z., Cui, Y., & Liu, S.
Affiliations
  • East China Normal University (CN)
  • Shanghai Urban Construction Vocational College (CN)
  • Shanxi University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Zhou, Mei
  • Yin, Zhihua
ORCID
Venue
DIGITAL HEALTH
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2025-05
Volume
11
Pages
20552076251346006-20552076251346006
ISSN
2055-2076 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1177/20552076251346006
PMC
PMC12107012
OpenAlex
W4410743168
Cited by
15
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 1
FWCI
2.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Digital Health (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Digital literacy in education
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
Keywords
digital health literacy, university students, influencing factors, socio-ecological model, anxiety and depression, physical activity, family socioeconomic factors, household registration, health education intervention, Chinese students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review