A systematic review of AI-based food and calorie detection systems in healthcare: Trends, techniques, and applications
Open accessAbstract
Background: Accurate assessment of calorie and nutrient intake is essential for the prevention and management of chronic diseases such as obesity and type 2 diabetes. However, traditional dietary assessment methods, including food diaries and dietary recalls, are often labor-intensive, time-consuming, and prone to reporting errors. Objective: This review aims to systematically examine the current landscape of artificial intelligence (AI)-based food recognition and calorie estimation systems in healthcare, highlighting technological developments, applications, performance trends, and research gaps. Methods: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Literature published between 2015 and 2025 was retrieved from Scopus, PubMed, IEEE Xplore, Web of Science. Google Scholar was additionally searched to identify relevant grey literature and citation records. Studies focusing on AI-driven dietary assessment using computer vision, machine learning, multimodal learning, and large language models (LLMs) were screened according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results: A total of 57 studies met the eligibility criteria. Three major technological trends were identified: (1) convolutional neural network (CNN)-based approaches, achieving 80–97% classification accuracy; (2) transformer-based architectures, including Vision Transformers and Swin Transformers reported accuracies ranging up to 99.83% under specific benchmark settings; and (3) multimodal and LLM-based systems, such as GPT-4V, Gemini, and Claude, demonstrating 89.8% food recognition accuracy and promising portion estimation performance. Commercial applications including MyFitnessPal, CalorieMama, DietCam, and FoodAI were also reviewed. Conclusion: AI-driven food recognition and dietary assessment technologies have significantly advanced nutritional monitoring and personalized healthcare. Nevertheless, challenges remain in portion estimation, clinical validation, and the representation of culturally diverse cuisines, particularly in South Asian contexts. Future research should focus on region-specific datasets, multimodal AI systems, and clinically validated deployment frameworks.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474 · see citing works
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., et al. (2021) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.n71 · Cited by 108,283 · see citing works
Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windows
Liu, Z., Lin, Y., Cao, Y., Hu, H., Wei, Y., Zhang, Z., Lin, S., & Guo, B. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.00986 · Cited by 35,534 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Kumarasamy, G., Nguyen, M. V., Hettiarachchige, P., Ranasinghe, P., Thayasivam, U., & Alahakoon, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Moratuwa (LK)
- La Trobe University (AU)
- University of Colombo (LK)
- Corresponding author
- Alahakoon, Damminda
- Venue
- DIGITAL HEALTH
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2026-02
- Volume
- 12
- ISSN
- 2055-2076 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W7215132410
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Digital Health (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Innovation in Digital Healthcare Systems
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Keywords
- calorie estimation, dietary assessment, computer vision, convolutional neural networks, vision transformer, Swin Transformer, large language models, multimodal learning, nutritional monitoring, obesity, type 2 diabetes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review