Rethinking Research Ethics, Power, and the Risk of Visibility in the Era of the “Alt-Right” Gaze
Open accessAbstract
This essay explores what the “alt-right” (White ethnonationalist, fascist, misogynistic, and anti-intellectual communities) means for social media researchers in terms of research ethics, risk, and visibility. First, it outlines how #Gamergate and #OperationDiggingDiGRA indicated that academic researchers could be targets of their hostility. This essay then draws on the work of Foucault and Mulvey to theorize how far-right groups have a kind of “gaze.” Then, it discusses how far-right extremism requires rethinking ethical questions around researchers and participants. Finally, some thoughts are offered as to what this means for how individuals, organizations, disciplines, and institutions can support research into these spaces.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Creating fictional personas, aliases or pseudonyms for public-facing activities is now considered best practice by a growing number of researchers.
“Indeed, this is now considered 'best practice' by a growing number of researchers (Marwick etal., 2016; Massanari, 2018).”
From Information security for criminological ethnographers (2024) · cites this paper as Massanari, 2018
Cites
Gillespie, T. (2010) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444809342738 · Cited by 2,522 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Platforms and their attendant algorithms are not neutral in their design (Bucher, 2012; Gillespie, 2010).”
BackgroundMassanari, A. (2017) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444815608807 · Cited by 1,264 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Information security for criminological ethnographers
Kindynis, T., & Fleetwood, J. (2024) · Crime, Media, Culture: An International Journal · doi:10.1177/17416590231219746 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“Indeed, this is now considered ‘best practice’ by a growing number of researchers (Marwick et al., 2016; Massanari, 2018).”
- Authors
- Massanari, A. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Chicago (US)
- Corresponding author
- Massanari, Adrienne L.
- Venue
- Social Media + Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2018-04
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 2056-3051 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2802620746
- Cited by
- 156
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 4
- FWCI
- 27.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Social Media + Society (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Populism, Right-Wing Movements
- Keywords
- alt-right, research ethics, researcher visibility, Gamergate, far-right extremism, gaze, Michel Foucault, misogyny, anti-intellectualism, social media research, researcher support
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review