Cited by 156Qualitative Research Methods and EthicsFocus Groups and Qualitative MethodsPopulism, Right-Wing Movements

Rethinking Research Ethics, Power, and the Risk of Visibility in the Era of the “Alt-Right” Gaze

Open access
Massanari, Adrienne L.·2018·Social Media + Society

Abstract

This essay explores what the “alt-right” (White ethnonationalist, fascist, misogynistic, and anti-intellectual communities) means for social media researchers in terms of research ethics, risk, and visibility. First, it outlines how #Gamergate and #OperationDiggingDiGRA indicated that academic researchers could be targets of their hostility. This essay then draws on the work of Foucault and Mulvey to theorize how far-right groups have a kind of “gaze.” Then, it discusses how far-right extremism requires rethinking ethical questions around researchers and participants. Finally, some thoughts are offered as to what this means for how individuals, organizations, disciplines, and institutions can support research into these spaces.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2056305118768302

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Creating fictional personas, aliases or pseudonyms for public-facing activities is now considered best practice by a growing number of researchers.

    “Indeed, this is now considered 'best practice' by a growing number of researchers (Marwick etal., 2016; Massanari, 2018).”

    From Information security for criminological ethnographers (2024) · cites this paper as Massanari, 2018

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Massanari, A. L.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Massanari, Adrienne L.
Venue
Social Media + Society
Published
2018-04
Volume
4
Issue
2
ISSN
2056-3051 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2802620746
Cited by
156
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 4
FWCI
27.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Media + Society (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Populism, Right-Wing Movements
Keywords
alt-right, research ethics, researcher visibility, Gamergate, far-right extremism, gaze, Michel Foucault, misogyny, anti-intellectualism, social media research, researcher support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review